Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Headline

GHSA-cwwm-hr97-qfxm: SpiceDB checks involving relations with caveats can result in no permission when permission is expected

Impact

On schemas involving arrows with caveats on the arrow’ed relation, when the path to resolve a CheckPermission request involves the evaluation of multiple caveated branches, requests may return a negative response when a positive response is expected.

For example, given this schema:

definition user {}

definition office {
    relation parent: office
    relation manager: user
    permission read = manager + parent->read
}

definition group {
    relation parent: office
    permission read = parent->read
}

definition document {
    relation owner: group with equals
    permission read = owner->read
}

caveat equals(actual string, required string) {
    actual == required
}

and these relationships:

office:headoffice#manager@user:maria
office:branch1#parent@office:headoffice
group:admins#parent@office:branch1
group:managers#parent@office:headoffice
document:budget#owner@group:admins[equals:{"required":"admin"}]
document:budget#owner@group:managers[equals:{"required":"manager"}]

Permission for 'document:budget#read@user:maria with {"actual" : "admin"}' is returned as NO_PERMISSION when HAS_PERMISSION is the correct answer.

Patches

Upgrade to v1.44.2.

Workarounds

Do not use caveats in your schema over an arrow’ed relation.

ghsa
#git#auth

Impact

On schemas involving arrows with caveats on the arrow’ed relation, when the path to resolve a CheckPermission request involves the evaluation of multiple caveated branches, requests may return a negative response when a positive response is expected.

For example, given this schema:

definition user {}

definition office {
    relation parent: office
    relation manager: user
    permission read = manager + parent->read
}

definition group {
    relation parent: office
    permission read = parent->read
}

definition document {
    relation owner: group with equals
    permission read = owner->read
}

caveat equals(actual string, required string) {
    actual == required
}

and these relationships:

office:headoffice#manager@user:maria
office:branch1#parent@office:headoffice
group:admins#parent@office:branch1
group:managers#parent@office:headoffice
document:budget#owner@group:admins[equals:{"required":"admin"}]
document:budget#owner@group:managers[equals:{"required":"manager"}]

Permission for ‘document:budget#read@user:maria with {"actual" : "admin"}’ is returned as NO_PERMISSION when HAS_PERMISSION is the correct answer.

Patches

Upgrade to v1.44.2.

Workarounds

Do not use caveats in your schema over an arrow’ed relation.

References

  • GHSA-cwwm-hr97-qfxm
  • https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-49011
  • authzed/spicedb@fe8dd9f
  • https://github.com/authzed/spicedb/releases/tag/v1.44.2

ghsa: Latest News

GHSA-wf8f-6423-gfxg: Jackson-core Vulnerable to Memory Disclosure via Source Snippet in JsonLocation