A decade and a half after Gh0st RAT first appeared, the "SugarGh0st RAT" variant aims to make life sweeter for cybercriminals.

Source: Niday Picture Library via Alamy Stock Photo

A new variant of the infamous "Gh0st RAT" malware has been identified in recent attacks targeting South Koreans and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Uzbekistan.

The Chinese group "C.Rufus Security Team" first released Gh0st RAT on the open Web in March 2008. Remarkably, it's still in use today, particularly in and around China, albeit in modified forms.

Since late August, for instance, a group with strong Chinese links has been distributing a modified Gh0st RAT deemed "SugarGh0st RAT." According to research from Cisco Talos, this threat actor drops the variant via JavaScript-laced Windows shortcuts, while distracting targets with customized decoy documents.

The malware itself is still largely the same, effective tool it's ever been, though it now sports some new decals to help sneak past antivirus software.

**SugarGh0st RAT's Traps**

The four samples of SugarGh0st, likely delivered via phishing, arrive on targeted machines as archives embedded with Windows LNK shortcut files. The LNKs hide malicious JavaScript which, upon opening, drops a decoy document — targeted for Korean or Uzbek government audiences — and the payload.

Like its progenitor — the Chinese origin remote access Trojan, first released to the public in March 2008 — SugarGh0st is a clean, multitooled espionage machine. A 32-bit dynamic link library (DLL) written in C++, it begins by collecting system data, then opens up the door to full remote access capabilities.

Attackers can use SugarGh0st to retrieve any information they might desire about their compromised machine, or start, terminate, or delete the processes it's running. They can use it to find, exfiltrate, and delete files, and erase any event logs to mask the resulting forensic evidence. The backdoor comes fitted with a keylogger, a screenshotter, a means of accessing the device's camera, and plenty of other useful functions for manipulating the mouse, performing native Windows operation, or simply running arbitrary commands.

"The thing that's most concerning to me is how it's specifically designed to evade previous detection methods," says Nick Biasini, Cisco Talos' head of outreach. With this new variant, specifically, "they took effort to do things that would change the way that core detection would work."

It isn't that SugarGh0st has any particularly novel evasion mechanisms. Rather, minor aesthetic changes make it appear different from prior variants, such as changing the command-and-control (C2) communication protocol such that instead of 5 bytes, the network packet headers reserve the first 8 bytes as magic bytes (a list of file signatures, used to confirm a file's contents). "It's just a very effective way to try and make sure that your existing security tooling isn't going to pick up on this right away," Biasini says.

**Gh0st RAT's Old Haunts**

Back in September 2008, the office of the Dalai Lama approached a security researcher (no, this isn't the beginning of a bad joke).

Its employees were being peppered with phishing emails. Microsoft applications were crashing, without explanation, across the organization. One monk recalled watching his computer open Microsoft Outlook all on its own, attach documents to an email, and send that email to an unrecognized address, all without his input.

A Gh0st RAT beta model's English-language UI. Source: Trend Micro EU via Wayback Machine

The Trojan used in that Chinese military-linked campaign against Tibetan monks has stood the test of time, Biasini says, for a few reasons.

"Open source malware families live long because actors get a fully functional piece of malware that they can manipulate as they see fit. It also allows people who don't know how to write malware to leverage this stuff for free," he explains.

Gh0st RAT, he adds, stands out in particular as "a very functional, very well-built RAT."

**About the Author(s)**

Nate Nelson is a freelance writer based in New York City. Formerly a reporter at Threatpost, he contributes to a number of cybersecurity blogs and podcasts. He writes "Malicious Life" -- an award-winning Top 20 tech podcast on Apple and Spotify -- and hosts every other episode, featuring interviews with leading voices in security. He also co-hosts "The Industrial Security Podcast," the most popular show in its field.

A New, Spookier Gh0st RAT Malware Haunts Global Cyber Targets

Security updates are tedious and difficult, so users continue to use a weak version of a core protocol and remain exposed to major attacks on critical infrastructure.

Source: John Edwards via Alamy Stock Photo

Programmable logic controllers (PLCs) that were vulnerable to the Stuxnet attack are still in use globally and rarely have security controls deployed — meaning they're still at risk.

More than 10 years after Stuxnet, new research shows users rarely switch on security controls such as using passwords, and feel updates are too cumbersome to be applied.

Colin Finck, tech lead of reverse engineering and connectivity at Enlyze, says the Siemens proprietary protocol which is used to read and write data as well as to program the S7 PLC. However, this is only protected by obfuscation, which the researchers were able to bypass.

Finck and his colleague Tom Dohrmann, software engineer, reverse engineering and connectivity, will present their findings at Black Hat Europe in London next week, in a talk titled "A Decade After Stuxnet: How Siemens S7 Is Still an Attacker's Heaven."

**Still Feeling the Stuxnet Effects**

In the 2010 attack, the Stuxnet attackers exploited several zero-day vulnerabilities in Microsoft Windows to ultimately gain access to Siemens software and the PLCs. This was done to gain access to and effectively damage high-speed centrifuges at the Iranian Bushehr nuclear power plant.

The impact of Stuxnet was huge, as it remotely damaged around a thousand centrifuges, and the worm's controllers were also able to analyze communication protocols between the PLCs to exploit further technological weaknesses. It also paved the way for things to come: After Stuxnet, a number of industrial control-related attacks were detected over the years, including BlackEnergy and Colonial Pipeline.

Finck tells Dark Reading that after the Stuxnet attacks took place, Siemens developed a revised protocol for the PLCs that added "lots of obfuscation and cryptography layers." However, the researchers in recent probing were able to bypass that obfuscation to give them the ability to read and write instructions for the PLCs, and ultimately stop the controller working in a proof of concept.

A statement from Siemens sent to Dark Reading acknowledged that the levels of obfuscation do not offer enough security, and a Security Bulletin from October 2022 stated that two of the PLCs "use a built-in global private key which cannot be considered anymore as sufficiently protected."

The statement added: "Siemens has deprecated this previous version of the communication protocol and encourages everyone to migrate to V17 or later to enable the new TLS \[Transport Layer Security\]-based communication protocol."

**Improved Firmware**

That most recent Siemens firmware released in 2022 does include TLS, but Finck claims there is no "long-term service for cybersecurity issues" and calls for Siemens to provide better means to update firmware "because right now, it's wide open to anybody who could just access it over the Internet."

In its statement, Siemens said it is aware of the talk scheduled for Black Hat Europe and stated that the talk "will describe the details of the legacy PG/PC and HMI communication protocol as used between TIA Portal/HMIs and SIMATIC S7-1500 SW Controller in versions before V17."

The company stated that no previously unknown security vulnerabilities will be disclosed in this talk and that Siemens is in close coordination with the researchers. Siemens recommended users to apply mitigations, including:

*   Applying client authentication using strong and individual access level passwords.
    
*   Migrating to V17 or later to enable the new TLS-based communication protocol for all SIMATIC S7-1200/1500 PLCs including SW Controller (see Siemens Security Bulletin SSB-898115 \[2\]).
    
*   Implementing the defense-in-depth approach for plant operations and configure the environment according to Siemens operational guidelines for industrial security.
    

Though the researchers praised the response by Siemens, they noted that PLC firmware is rarely updated by users, "and there's not an established update process to quickly roll out \[updates\] to a fleet of machines."

Finck says doing updates is "probably a tedious manual process to walk to every machine, plug something in and update the firmware," and thus, Siemens needs to offer better update processes so customers have an incentive to deploy those updates.

In the meantime, he says, "you better not have a direct connection to all PLCs right now, due to the aforementioned security problems."

**About the Author(s)**

With more than 20 years experience of B2B journalism, including 12 years covering cybersecurity, Dan Raywood brings a wealth of experience and information security knowledge to the table. He has covered everything from the rise of APTs, nation-state hackers, and hacktivists, to data breaches and the increase in government regulation to better protect citizens and hold businesses to account. Dan is based in the U.K., and when not working, he spends his time stopping his cats from walking over his keyboard and worrying about the (Tottenham) Spurs’ next match.

Siemens PLCs Still Vulnerable to Stuxnet-like Cyberattacks

The prolific threat actor has laundered hundreds of millions of dollars in stolen virtual currency through the service.

Source: Yogesh More via Alamy Stock Photo

In its continued efforts to crack down on North Korea's most formidable state-sponsored threat group, the US government has seized a virtual currency mixer that has been serving as the principal way the group launders money stolen from its cybercriminal activity.

The US Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned Sinbad.io, or just Sinbad, a crypto-mixing service that the feds said has processed millions of dollars worth of virtual currency from crypto heists by the Lazarus Group, according to a press release from OFAC.

As a result of the action, all Sinbad property and interests in property in the US or controlled by anyone in the US must be blocked and reported to OFAC, and people in the US are prohibited from having any involvement with the service. Further, anyone who engages in transactions with the service also may be exposed to sanctions.  

Crypto mixing — a technique that uses pools of cryptocurrency to complicate the tracking of electronic transactions — is a popular service tapped by cybercriminals to obscure their illegal transactions. In the case of Lazarus, the group used Sinbad to launder crypto from various malicious incidents, including the Horizon Bridge and Axie Infinity heist, the government said.

The prolific threat actor is well known for conducting cyberattacks on behalf of the regime of North Korea's leader, Kim Jong Un, engaging in widespread crypto theft through various cyberattacks — including targeting crypto engineers or using compromised systems to mine crypto — to fund government activities, among other endeavors. The US government officially sanctioned Lazarus in 2019, effectively making it a crime to do any kind of business with the group or its associates.

**Crackdown on Crypto Mixing**

Other cybercriminal groups also use Sinbad to keep various illegal financial activities such as drug trafficking, buying child pornography, and other Dark Web transactions away from the prying eyes of law enforcement. However, global authorities have caught on to the use of crypto mixers and are now starting to monitor and block the activity.

In March, an international law enforcement effort led by the US Department of Justice (DoJ) led to the shuttering another known crypto-mixing service, ChipMixer. Then in May and earlier this month, respectively, the feds also seized one crypto mixer, Blender.io (Blender), and redesignated another, Tornado Cash — both known to be used by Lazarus, they said.

OFAC in April also sanctioned two over-the-counter virtual currency traders who facilitated the conversion of stolen virtual currency to fiat currency for North Korean actors associated with Lazarus.

“While we encourage responsible innovation in the digital asset ecosystem, we will not hesitate to take action against illicit actors," said Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Wally Adeyemo, in a statement. "Mixing services that enable criminal actors, such as the Lazarus Group, to launder stolen assets will face serious consequences.”

**Crypto Mixer of Choice**

All told, Lazarus, which has been active for more than 10 years, is believed to have stolen more than $2 billion worth of digital assets across multiple cryptocurrency heists, according to the US government.

Sinbad, which operates on the Bitcoin blockchain, has been one of the primary facilitators of the trafficking of these funds as the group's preferred mixing service. The service, which some security experts believe is the successor to Blender, aids cybercriminal transactions by obfuscating their origin, destination, and counterparties, so they are difficult to track.

Some of the larger sums that Lazarus has laundered through the crypto mixer include "a significant portion" of the following crypto heists: $100 million stolen in June from customers of Atomic Wallet; $620 million stolen from Axie Infinity in March 2022; and $100 million nabbed from Horizon Bridge in June 2022. 

Despite being sanctioned and constantly monitored by security researchers and global authorities alike, Lazarus remains undaunted and shows little sign of slowing down. Some of the group's most recent activity includes posing as Meta to deploy a complex backdoor at an aerospace organization, and aiming to lure crypto pros with fake job postings — the latter a common tactic of the group.

There are signs that the mounting pressure on the group has affected them, though. Lazarus recently aligned with other North Korean state-sponsored threat actors to make them collectively harder to track. However, this collaboration also sets the stage for more aggressive and complex cyberattacks that will demand strategic defense and response on the part of targets.

**About the Author(s)**

Elizabeth Montalbano is a freelance writer, journalist, and therapeutic writing mentor with more than 25 years of professional experience. Her areas of expertise include technology, business, and culture. Elizabeth previously lived and worked as a full-time journalist in Phoenix, San Francisco, and New York City; she currently resides in a village on the southwest coast of Portugal. In her free time, she enjoys surfing, hiking with her dogs, traveling, playing music, yoga, and cooking.

Feds Seize 'Sinbad' Crypto Mixer Used by North Korea's Lazarus

No Iranian bank customers are safe from financially motivated cybercriminals wielding convincing but fake mobile apps.

Source: Stephen Barnes/Finance via Alamy Stock Photo

A mammoth campaign targeting Iran's banking sector has grown in magnitude in recent months, with nearly 300 malicious Android apps targeting users for their account credentials, credit cards, and crypto wallets.

Four months ago, researchers from Sophos detailed a lengthy campaign involving 40 malicious banking apps designed to harvest credentials belonging to unwitting customers. By imitating four of the Islamic Republic's most significant financial institutions — Bank Mellat, Bank Saderat, Resalat Bank, and the Central Bank of Iran — hackers were able to install and hide their copycat apps on victims' phones, harvesting logins, intercepting SMS messages with one-time passcodes, and stealing sensitive financial information, including credit cards.

Apparently, that was just the opening salvo. A new blog post from Zimperium has revealed 245 more apps associated with the same, clearly ongoing campaign, 28 of which had not previously been recorded on VirusTotal.

And this new trove isn't just bigger — it's more diverse, and more sophisticated than the first 40 were, featuring new kinds of targets, and tactics for stealth and persistence.

**285 Fake Banking Apps**

The 245 new apps discovered since the summer extend beyond the bounds of the original 40 by actively targeting four new Iranian banks, with some evidence that they have another four more in their sights.

Besides banks, the attackers have also started probing for data relating to sixteen cryptocurrency platforms, including such popular ones as Metamask, KuCoin, and Coinbase.

To facilitate the targeting of a dozen banks and 16 crypto hubs, the attackers have also added some new tools to their arsenal. For example, one little trick they use to avoid infrastructure takedowns involves a command-and-control server with the lone purpose of distributing phishing links. As the researchers explained, this "allows for the server URL to be hardcoded on the application without the risk of being taken down."

The group's most notable new tactic, however, is how its apps abuse accessibility services. 

"While using the accessibility API, they get a way to programmatically access the UI's elements," explains Nico Chiaraviglio, chief scientist of Zimperium. He explains that attackers can invisibly interact with the device in some of the same ways a user can, to malicious effect. For example, "they can request for dangerous permissions (such as reading SMS) and when the user is prompted to accept the permission, they click on 'Accept' before the user even sees the notification. Or they prevent uninstallation by clicking on 'Cancel' when the user tries to uninstall the app."

Thus far the fake apps have been limited to Android devices. But among the attackers' belongings, the researchers did uncover phishing websites mimicking banking apps' Apple App Store pages, indicating that the campaign may expand to iPhones in the near future.

Long before that happens, the campaign will have touched thousands. "Based on the information obtained from one of their Telegram channels, we know that there are thousands of victims. But we could only access one of the channels used (since one of them is private) and there is no guarantee that they didn't use other channels in the past." 

**About the Author(s)**

Nate Nelson is a freelance writer based in New York City. Formerly a reporter at Threatpost, he contributes to a number of cybersecurity blogs and podcasts. He writes "Malicious Life" -- an award-winning Top 20 tech podcast on Apple and Spotify -- and hosts every other episode, featuring interviews with leading voices in security. He also co-hosts "The Industrial Security Podcast," the most popular show in its field.

Deluge of Nearly 300 Fake Apps Floods Iranian Banking Sector

AI tools can deliver quick and easy results and offer huge business benefits — but they also bring hidden risks.

Source: marcos alvarado via Alamy Stock Photo

COMMENTARY

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies continue to receive significant news coverage for the potential benefits and troubling dangers they could unleash. Forecasts like the Nielsen Norman Group estimating that AI tools may improve an employee's productivity by 66% have companies everywhere wanting to leverage these tools immediately. Other experts warn that AI usage could have several negative consequences, including generating inaccurate results, data leaks, and theft. So, how can companies employ these powerful AI/ML tools without compromising their security? Below, we'll touch on the risks AI tools can present and offer eight tips that will help your company leverage these tools as securely as possible.

**The Risks of AI Tools**

In general, AI/ML is simply statistics at scale. All AI models rely on data to statistically generate results for their focus area. Therefore, most risks revolve around said data, especially confidential or sensitive data. Companies using external AI/ML tools risk that the product vendor might use your data to train their algorithms and accidentally leak or steal your intellectual property. Additionally, an AI tool that uses bad data will generate inaccurate results. Fortunately, many AI tools are quite powerful and can be used securely, with a few precautions.

**Tip 1: Remember, if it's free, you are the product.**

If you use a free AI tool or service, you should suspect it may leverage the data you provide. Many early AI services and tools, including ChatGPT, employ a usage model that's similar to social media services like Facebook and TikTok. While you don't pay money to use those sites, you are sharing your private data, which those companies use to target ads and monetize. Similarly, a free AI service can gather data from your devices and keep your prompts, which it uses to train its model. While not seemingly malicious, you never know how an AI service will monetize your data. If that company gets breached, threat actors may obtain access to your data.

**Tip 2: Have legal review agreements.**

To learn how an AI tool or service will handle your data, read the vendor's end-user license agreement, master service agreement, terms and conditions, and privacy policies. These lengthy, complex documents often use tricky language to obscure how the vendor might use your data, so company lawyers should review them. Your legal department knows the regulatory requirements for safeguarding your sensitive data, including personally identifiable information. They can interpret these documents capably and alert you if any terms put your data at risk. A data privacy officer who specializes in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), or any other privacy compliance can also help review these agreements.

**Tip 3: Guard internal data.**

A simple risk of using external AI tools is that an employee — intentionally or not — could share sensitive or confidential data with the tool, exposing the data to misuse. To mitigate this threat, companies must ensure they apply least privilege principles to who can access confidential or sensitive data. Unfortunately, some organizations don't adequately block employees from accessing corporate data that their role doesn't require. If you limit employees to access only the precise data they need, you minimize the amount of data they might divulge to an external AI tool.

**Tip 4: Review settings and consider paying for privacy.**

Whether AI tools or services are free or paid, they often have settings for added privacy. Some tools can be set to not store your prompt data. Review your AI tool's privacy settings and configure them to your preferences. Also, while free tools likely reserve the right to use your data, you can pay licensing fees to get enterprise versions of AI tools that offer more protection. These tools often include features of not using your data and keeping it segmented. 

**Tip 5: Validate the security of AI tool vendors.**

Vendor and supply chain security validation should be a default practice for any new external tool or service partner you adopt. Digital supply chain breaches prove that vendors can become the weakest link in maintaining security. Therefore, third-party risk management (TPRM) products and processes are crucial to information security. A formal TPRM process is vital when using AI tools and service partners.

**Tip 6: Leverage local open source AI frameworks and tools.**

The accessibility of online, external AI tools that are free and user-friendly brings risk. To assure data privacy, consider avoiding external tools. Alternatively, there are free AI frameworks and tools you can deploy and create yourself. These frameworks require more work as well as AI and data science expertise, so they bring their own cost to use.

**Tip 7: Track your company's AI usage.**

It’s difficult to track every asset, software-as-a-service (SaaS) tool, or data store that your employees use, as the cloud and Web services have empowered everyone to use Web-based tools. The same goes for AI-based SaaS offerings. To monitor which external AI tools your employees utilize, how, and with what data, audit and document AI usage as part of the buying process. In identifying all the internal and external AI tools used, you better understand the risks you face. 

**Tip 8: Create an AI policy and raise risk awareness.**

In security, everything starts with policy. The risks your company faces depend on your specific organization's missions and needs, and the data you use. Companies that traffic in public data may face a low data-sharing risk and allow a permissive AI policy, while those that deal in confidential matters will have stringent rules around data use in external AI tools. Ultimately, you must craft an AI policy that's tailored to your company's needs. Once you have that policy, communicate it and the risks associated with AI tools with your employees regularly.

AI tools can deliver quick and easy results and offer huge business benefits while also bringing hidden risks. Fortunately, you can leverage AI tools securely by adopting a few precautions and be on your way to realizing the benefits these tools promise.

**About the Author(s)**

Chief Security Officer, WatchGuard Technologies

Corey Nachreiner is the chief security officer (CSO) of WatchGuard Technologies. Recognized as a thought leader in IT security, Nachreiner spearheads WatchGuard's technology and security vision and direction. He has operated at the frontline of cybersecurity for 25 years, evaluating and making accurate predictions about information security trends. As an authority on network security and an internationally quoted commentator, Nachreiner's expertise and ability to dissect complex security topics make him a sought-after speaker at forums such as Gartner, Infosec, and RSA. He is also a regular contributor to leading publications including CNET, Dark Reading, Forbes, Help Net Security, and more. Find him on www.secplicity.org.

8 Tips on Leveraging AI Tools Without Compromising Security

These office giving-friendly fidgets, stress balls, brain teasers, and more are perfect to calm the most harried cybersecurity professionals.

Whether it's a CISO feeling the anxiety of potentially being an organizational scapegoat or a SOC analyst drowning in alerts, cybersecurity pros are constantly feeling the wear and tear of daily, existential work pressure. As security teams figure out what to get their Secret Santa recipients or contribute to the White Elephant gift exchange over the holidays this year, maybe stress relief should be the name of the game. The following are some great suggestions for givers seeking a peaceful option to gift stressed-out cyber practitioners.

**About the Author(s)**

Contributing Writer, Dark Reading

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.

You May Also Like

10 Holiday Gifts for Stressed-Out Security Pros

The collaboration focuses on helping security teams detect and address cloud threats more effectively.

Source: BluePlanetStudio via Adobe Stock Photo

For many enterprises, the ability to address security threats and manage assets consistently across both cloud and on-premises environments is an ongoing challenge. A new partnership between Securonix and Wiz offers a unified approach to protect digital assets, identify risks, and proactively address security threats across multiple environments.

The collaboration brings together Wiz's cloud native application protection platform (CNAPP) with the advanced security analytics and threat detection capabilities in Securonix Unified Defense SIEM. Securonix relies on threat chains to correlate and connect seemingly unrelated security events. Integrated with Wiz's cloud-specific insights provides security teams with context to understand the threat or attack's blast radius and how it is impacting the organization's infrastructure.

The goal is to give enterprise security teams a single prioritized view of risk based on a deep cloud analysis across misconfigurations, network exposure, vulnerabilities, and malware. Mutual customers will be able to detect threats more effectively and improve their understanding of the impact of a threat on their cloud security posture, the companies said.

"Wiz analyzes the complete cloud context, while Securonix analyzes behavior analytics," said Oron Noah, director of product management at Wiz, in a statement.

**About the Author(s)**

Wiz-Securonix Partnership Promises Unified Threat Detection

Amazon Web Services announced enhancements to several of its security tools, including GuardDuty, Inspector, Detective, IAM Access Analyzer, and Secrets Manager, to name a few during its re:Invent event.

Source: Techa Tungateja via Alamy Stock Photo

Amazon Web Services has been unveiling a steady stream of announcements during its AWS re:Invent 2023 event in Las Vegas this week. As expected, the focus over the four days has been on artificial intelligence (AI) as AWS strives to show that its offerings can match – or surpass – those from Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure. But even beyond generative AI, AWS is highlighting enhancements to its threat detection, vulnerability assessment, and security policy tools.

First up: AWS has expanded Amazon GuardDuty with Amazon GuardDuty EC2 Runtime Monitoring and Amazon GuardDuty ECS Runtime Monitoring. GuardDuty EC2 Runtime Monitoring, now in preview, introduces runtime threat detection for Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud workloads to give security teams visibility into on-host, operating system-level activities. It also provides container-level context into threats. Amazon GuardDuty ECS Runtime Monitoring uses a lightweight security agent to extend threat detection for workloads running on EC2 and AWS Fargate.

AWS Secrets Manager now supports a single API call to identify and retrieve a group of secrets associated with the application. The BatchGetSecretValue API simplifies developer workflows. And administrators can now enter their own customer-specific security controls in AWS Security Hub to customize security posture monitoring.

**Generative AI to Security**

AWS is adding generative AI to its security tools Amazon Inspector and Amazon Detective. Amazon Inspector, a code-scanning tool for AWS Lambda functions, offers assisted code remediation using generative AI and automated reasoning and can provide in-context code patches for multiple vulnerability classes. Amazon Detective helps security investigations by using generative AI to analyze multiple activities related to potential security events and find group summaries.

Additionally, Amazon Inspector has agentless vulnerability scanning for Amazon Elastic Cloud Compute instances in preview. Amazon Detective now supports log retrieval from Amazon Security Lake and investigating AWS identity and access management entities for indicators of compromise.

**Identity and Access Announcements**

The AWS Identity and Access Manager (IAM) Access Analyzer continuously analyzes user accounts to identify unused access privileges and permissions to help administrators implement the principle of least privilege. Security teams can review the findings to prioritize which accounts need action. The tool also provides custom policy checks to validate that IAM policies adhere to the organization's security standards before systems are deployed.

Amazon EKS Pod Identity allows administrators to define required IAM permissions for applications in Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service clusters. This allows the applications to connect with AWS services outside of the cluster.

Finally, AWS announced support for mutually authenticating clients presenting X509 certificates to Application Load Balancer. This helps administrators offload client authentication to the load balancer to ensure only trusted clients are able to access the organization's cloud applications.

**About the Author(s)**

Rundown of Security News From AWS re:Invent 2023

Melissa Hathaway, a former White House cybersecurity adviser, says Biden is pushing through more regulatory reforms than previous administrations.

Lack of transparency with third-party suppliers is companies' biggest cyberthreat, says CIGI's Melissa Hathaway.Source: Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Center

Melissa Hathaway hasn't shied away from advising corporate boards and government leaders on cybersecurity policy since leaving the White House a decade ago. Hathaway, a former National Security Council Cybersecurity Chief, served in two administrations, leading the Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative for President George W. Bush, and launching President Barack Obama's Cyberspace Policy Review.

Currently a member of the Centre for International Governance Innovation's board of directors, Hathaway recently spoke about current digital risks at a CIGI conference last month. Hathaway also provides consulting services as president of Hathaway Global Strategies, and most recently, was tapped by data protection vendor Commvault to chair its newly formed Cyber Resilience Council. During a meeting in New York City, Hathaway shared her views on the latest global cybersecurity threats from China and Russia, and the impact of the war in Israel.

Dark Reading: How would you compare today's threat landscape to when you were working for the White House over a decade ago?

Hathaway: Ransomware is on the rise, and it has become very sophisticated. Now you can encrypt 50 terabytes of data in less than five minutes, and all an intruder needs is one path in. A lot of really destructive, malicious software is being developed, and proof pointed over in Ukraine, such as the wiper virus attacks that we saw against Viasat. You're also starting to see the infections of low-level botnets capable of high-volume distributed denial service attacks. I'd say, though, the biggest problem is that companies don't have enough transparency into the dependencies of their third-party suppliers. The path into most of the companies right now, if it's not an unpatched system, is through their third-party suppliers.

DR: Such as software supply chain vulnerabilities?

Hathaway: Yes, but it doesn't have to be just that. It could be the trusted supplier who didn't patch their own infrastructure and they're the pathway in not just the product that was bad, like what we're dealing right now with Cisco IOS.

DR: What's your take on President Biden's approach to cybersecurity?

Hathaway: The new White House strategy is focused a lot on making companies more responsible for not only their product and introducing secure development lifecycle, but also making them more responsible for their governance and enterprise risk management. And that's been needed for more than a decade. I think that this administration is really focused on making corporates responsible.

DR: Would you say this White House is doing more than previous administrations?

Hathaway: They're just taking a different approach. The Biden administration is focused on a regulatory approach which previous administrations never took.

DR: And do you think that's a good thing?

Hathaway: In 2010 I wrote that there was an important moment for the SEC, FCC, and FTC to own their authorities to get to resilience. But I think that there's a challenge when you have all the regulators going in different directions. It puts an undue cost on industry. And so there has to be some harmonization of the regulatory frameworks that the administration is pushing. But that's difficult to do. One, it requires strong leadership and understanding of how the government works. Two, it requires getting those regulators to potentially cooperate and coordinate, and they don't necessarily have it within their remit to do that. And then third, you have to decide which problem you want to solve first, second, and third.

DR: With the current policies that are being laid out and proposed, to what effect do you think the outcome of the next presidential election could change those policies if there is a change in administrations?

Hathaway: You have the new SEC Rule and it took almost 13 years to get that rule in place. If another administration were to come in, regardless of party, and wanted to change direction, it would be very difficult to change the regulations and the laws in this country. A new president could come up with another executive order or policy, but those are very difficult. I mean, it's easy to write, but then it's all about the execution. And there's really no penalties associated with those, even within the government.

DR: What are your concerns about China as a threat?

Hathaway: They are a leading cyber power and probably have more manpower of meeting their overall national objectives than we do in the US or anywhere. Part of that is a percentage of the population, but they have made it a strategic priority as part of their five-year plan, and as part of their overall strategies.

Among their strategies, they are using one industrial espionage \[element\] that was featured on 60 Minutes just two weeks ago, with the Five Eyes. Industrial espionage has been going on for more than a decade, and they're continuing to move that path forward.

Through the Belt and Road Initiative, they are positioning their national champions for the delivery of telecom, data services, and other things. And they are one of the leading providers in the Global South. And that's all part of their economic strategy and changing some of the global, I would say world order of things.

They're also leading in central bank digital currencies. They saw Bitcoin as an opportunity, and they started their policy development and experimentation with it more than about a decade ago. And now they've since rolled out a CBDC \[central bank digital currency\], and they have more than 300 million people using it. If you start to think about that \[as\] a transition in the financial services systems around the world, they've got an interbank digital currency exchange that's outside of the US dollar through the CBDCs. And so, they have a longer-term strategy.

DR: What can policymakers do about that?

Hathaway: We have to look at Russia, China, Iran, \[and\] North Korea in different lenses. They are worthy opponents. And it's not like they're second rate, they're actually all first rate in different categories. And that requires us to think about things differently. Some of the initiatives of the Biden administration are important, like secure development lifecycle, which means your code better be good. We've got too many bad products in the market that are easily exploitable. We need to really be thinking about the next generation standards — we lost on 5G, are we going to lose on 6G too? And that requires us to really think about international standards differently.

I think we also need to be thinking about what are some of the cases that we're going to have to be thinking about — when you move to 5G and you're moving to the cloud, and you've got autonomous everything, you're going to have edge compute — that's going to have a whole very different set of policies on that data movement, from my driverless car to your driverless car, and what's processing them at the edge, so neither of us will have a problem. We're not really addressing that security, the data security, data privacy, the data movement, and this edge processing that's going to go forward. That requires us to really think about a different architecture about resilience, safety, privacy, and security. And that conversation I don't really think has started in our country, and we need to start it now.

DR: Has the war in Israel already changed the equation of the threat landscape?

Hathaway: Absolutely. I think things are unstable. It adds three things: First, you're starting to see new malicious software being developed and I would say swift synthetic media, deep fakes, and other things. It's causing a lot of confusion, but there's a lot of experimentation happening from a lot of groups, not just Hamas or Hezbollah — there's a lot of experimentation happening with, I would say, the malicious activities' disinformation as well as malicious software.

I think second, we're going to see a supply chain disruption of the Israeli IT and cyber industry that I don't think we've thought through what's going to happen. As you mobilize 300,000 reservists, some of which are in that industry, some of these industry providers are going to have a slowdown or a disruption. So, we have to think through that.

Israel is a leading innovator in some of these things; I think that there's going to be a supply chain disruption coming because they are a leader in IT.

Third, I just worry about the overall stability of the region; we've got a lot of geopolitical instability \[and\] too much around the world right now.

DR: Obviously, there are a lot of Israeli cybersecurity companies or even companies like Microsoft, Check Point, Google, and many others.

Hathaway: Well, you have the tech innovation center at Beersheba, but then you have a very large IT tech cyber industry in Israel that serves and works and partners with all Silicon Valley, and Seattle, Boston, and such. So, I think that there's going to be a disruption that we need to anticipate because this war is not going to be done anytime soon.

**About the Author(s)**

Jeffrey Schwartz is a journalist who has covered information security and all forms of business and enterprise IT, including client computing, data center and cloud infrastructure, and application development for more than 30 years. Jeff is a regular contributor to Channel Futures. Previously, he was editor-in-chief of Redmond magazine and contributed to its sister titles Redmond Channel Partner, Application Development Trends, and Virtualization Review. Earlier, he held editorial roles with CommunicationsWeek, InternetWeek, and VARBusiness. Jeff is based in the New York City suburb of Long Island.

Ex-Cybersecurity Adviser to Bush, Obama Weighs in On Current Admin

PRESS RELEASE

TEL AVIV, Israel, Nov. 29, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Piiano, the leading data protection company, today announced Piiano Flows, the industry’s first privacy-centric static code analyzer. The company will offer free scans until the end of 2023.

High-profile data leaks, including Duolingo’s PII leak in late August, underscore the critical importance of data protection for businesses on a global scale. Flows automatically and continuously analyzes source code throughout development processes and tracks when, where and how sensitive data are being used and stored. This enables security teams to shift data security left with a more proactive approach. Piiano’s tool finds potential data leaks inside source code and ensures that sensitive information, such as Personally Identifiable Information (PII), credentials and financial information, are protected before faulty code reaches production.

“Security leaders want to focus more on data security during development, but don’t have the right tools to do so at scale and see what’s happening with data in their code. Data vulnerabilities are even harder to hunt down after faulty code reaches production, which is why our tool nips the problem at the source,” says Gil Dabah, co-founder and CEO of Piiano.

Image shows sensitive data statistics gathered by analyzing a code repository.

Developers are expected to work at a rapid pace and under a great deal of stress. Compounded by a lack of security expertise and orientation, they are prone to making errors through little fault of their own that can expose data at the code level–such as forgetting to remove debugging logs or inadvertently exposing sensitive data through public or third-party APIs.

According to Justinian Fortenberry, CISO at Etsy and a board advisor to Piiano, “Piiano Flows is a very powerful and straightforward solution that, for the first time, enables enterprises to save time identifying potential data leaks during and after the application development process.”

Dabah likens Flows to a “SAST-type tool for proactive DPSM.” The company’s proprietary NLP ML model and taint analysis algorithms – a more accurate approach than more commonly used Large Language Models (LLMs) – maps and highlights any code that touches sensitive data, including incoming, outgoing and stored data, to help find data privacy and security issues and blind spots that can happen in runtime.

Flows, available for free, is designed for quick and easy use with an intuitive interface for security teams. To eliminate third-party risk, it only requires access to code itself without ever accessing production environments or production data stores containing sensitive customer data.

About Piiano

Piiano provides a data protection platform for app-sec and engineering teams to secure sensitive customer data and ensure their privacy – even in the event of a breach. Enterprises can scan their source code to find data leaks and similar data exposure issues and remediate them by securing the sensitive data by using its data protection APIs. With Piiano’s building blocks, engineers and security leaders can save significant time, effort and resources while achieving true security without slowing down.

Source

DARKReading