Non-human identities authenticate machine-to-machine communication. The big challenge now is to secure their elements and processes — before attackers can intercept.

Source: Poptika via Shutterstock

When industrial automation giant Schneider Electric revealed last month that ransomware gang Hellcat stole 40GB of sensitive data, the attackers acknowledged using exposed credentials to breach Schneider's Jira server. 

Once inside the company's project management system, attackers used the miniOrange REST API, a widely used authentication plug-in, to exfiltrate 400,000 rows of data, including 75,000 email addresses, employee names, and customer records. 

What this and dozens of other incidents have in common is that the attackers exploited vulnerabilities in non-human identities (NHIs). Unlike human identities used for authentication by individuals via identity and access management (IAM) credentials, NHIs, also known as machine identities or service accounts, are used by applications, services, and Internet of Things (IoT) installations for authenticating machine-to-machine communications. 

Predictably, investors are funding startups with products that govern and mitigate NHI risk, while more established companies are adding such capabilities, either internally or via acquisition. 

Astrix Security, a prominent startup that says it created the term NHI, earlier this month raised $45 million in Series B funding led by Menlo Ventures and artificial intelligence (AI) platform provider Anthropic, bringing its total funding to $85 million since its founding in 2021.

"A year ago, the term NHI did not exist, and now everyone is talking about them," says Astrix co-founder and CEO Alon Jackson.

Astrix describes its platform as a suite of identity security posture management (ISPM) tools, including non-human identity threat detection and response, NHI life cycle management, auto-remediation, and secrets scanning. 

**Where NHIs Are Vulnerable**

Typical NHIs include API keys, bots, OAuth tokens, database credentials, certificates, and secrets. As organizations have accelerated use of cloud-native applications, IoT infrastructure, and, most notably, AI-based automation during the past two years, NHIs have become a more alarming threat.

Unlike IAM and privilege access management (PAM), few organizations centrally manage NHIs, and there's greater likelihood that they have excessive permissions without expiration dates.

"There are numerous issues with NHIs, including unencrypted credentials, having a full inventory of NHI accounts, inactive accounts, and lack of account ownership," explained Omdia senior analyst Don Tait in a November report.  

Many CISOs are just learning the implications of NHIs. A recent Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) survey of over 800 security and IT professionals found that 24% plan to invest in NHI security during the next six months, and 36% will do so within a year.

More than half of those surveyed believe they may have experienced an incident related to NHIs. 

Astrix is not the only company with NHI discovery and remediation tools attracting investors. Among those that raised Series A funding in 2024 include Aembit ($25 million), Entro Security ($18 million), and Oasis Security ($35 million), which recently discovered the MFA bypass flaw Microsoft Azure. 

The most prominent bet on protecting NHIs was placed in May when CyberArk paid $1.54 billion to acquire machine identity management provider Venafi.

"As NHI continues to evolve, so are the notable vendors in this space," says Christopher Steffen, VP of research at Enterprise Management Associates (EMA). 

Meanwhile, AppSec providers are adding NHI protection capabilities to their offerings. GitGuardian, known for detecting and remediating leaked secrets in GitHub and other source code repositories, recently launched GitGuardian NHI Governance. GitGuardian officials describe it as an addition to its existing platform that will provide visibility and control of NHI life cycles and their associated secrets. 

GitGuardian's initial release will integrate with five key secrets management platforms: HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Conjur, AWS Secrets Manager, Google Cloud Secrets Manager, and Azure Key Vault.

**Role of NHI Security **

Failure to adequately rotate credentials, overprivileged accounts or identities, and insufficient monitoring and logging are among the common causes of incidents involving compromised NHIs, the CSA report indicates.

"To claim their identity, machines authenticate via secrets like API keys, OAuth tokens, database credentials, usernames and passwords, and certificates," noted GitGuardian product manager Soudanya Ain in a blog post. "They've become the number one vector for a successful attack, frequently overlooked."

Besides the Schneider incident, the NHI Management Group counts over 40 breaches tied to compromised non-human identity credentials during the past two years, including:

*   Microsoft's Midnight Blizzard, which enabled the attackers to access and breach a legacy test OAuth application with elevated privileges.
    
*   The Snowflake breach, which compromised its various customers, including Santander Bank and Ticketmaster.
    
*   Last summer's GitHub extortion attacks by threat actors who used malicious OAuth apps to breach trusted third-party integrations.
    
*   A breach by an attacker who stole secrets, including authentication tokens from the popular Hugging Face open source repository of APIs and other resources for developers who build AI models. 
    

Next year, the risk from compromised NHIs is expected to grow, as is their proportion to human identities, as AI automates more business processes. Omdia's Tait noted industry estimates of the current ratio of NHIs to human identities is 50:1.

"That figure is only likely to increase going forward," he wrote. 

"We do expect NHI growth is going to accelerate further," added Maxine Holt, senior director of Omdia's cybersecurity practice, speaking during a December webinar presented by Dark Reading.

Holt warned that ungoverned NHIs will further raise the threat landscape.

"These identities do require management to ensure secure communication between different services and to prevent unauthorized access and facilitate accountability," she said. "Of course, we need the audit trail there as well. We believe that it's really important to recognize non-human identities as a vital link in the cyber threat chain."

According to the CSA survey, 69% said they are concerned about NHIs as a threat vector, while 38% reported that their organizations have low or no visibility to third parties connected by OAuth apps. Only 20% have a formal process for revoking API keys, and even fewer have procedures for rotating them. 

"There's definitely that trend toward understanding NHI security better and addressing them," said John Yeoh, CSA's global VP of research, at a public meeting in September. "We only expect the NHI field to explode and get out further."

**Blending NHIs and Human Identities **

The current crop of NHI platforms is designed for machine identities, not human credentials, managed by IAM and PAM systems from Microsoft, Okta, Ping Identity, JumpCloud, CyberArk, BeyondTrust, and OneLogin.

Astrix's Jackson says its new round of funding will, in part, go toward expanding integration with human identities.

"Our customers are asking for a 360-degree view of the human and the non-human identities," Jackson says. "But we will be keeping our edge on the NHI space. This is not just posture management and not just anomaly detection, but it's creating the connections in a secure manner."

GitGuardian, which deals with application security and platform engineering teams, has a similar ambition of providing links from its secrets vaults to IAM platforms.

"That's the plan," says Pierre Le Clézio, the company's lead product manager. "But not yet. We are starting with the secret managers and that ecosystem, and then we will have the IAM systems."

**Anticipate M&A Activity **

As NHI security continues to evolve, so will the notable providers, EMA's Steffen says.

"It seems very likely that larger technology players are going to jump into this space," he says. "Many already have complementary offerings, like Wiz and Palo Alto Networks, and are jumping into NHI — either through acquisition or developing their own solution."

Steffen also anticipates that identity providers like Ping and Okta will delve into NHI.

"They already have the infrastructure and the means to enhance NHI for most enterprises, as well as they already lead the market in identity solutions."

Omdia's Holt also anticipates M&A activity.

"The evolving threat landscape really does necessitate a shift toward comprehensive products and solutions that take on both human and non-human identities," she said. "But the market is still developing. A lot of the players are startups. We expect to see more of a move towards platform support and more acquisitions during 2025 for managing non-human identities."

**About the Author**

Contributing Writer

Jeffrey Schwartz is a journalist who has covered information security and all forms of business and enterprise IT, including client computing, data center and cloud infrastructure, and application development for more than 30 years. Jeff is a regular contributor to Channel Futures. Previously, he was editor-in-chief of Redmond magazine and contributed to its sister titles Redmond Channel Partner, Application Development Trends, and Virtualization Review. Earlier, he held editorial roles with CommunicationsWeek, InternetWeek, and VARBusiness. Jeff is based in the New York City suburb of Long Island.

Vendors Chase Potential of Non-Human Identity Management

Seemingly innocent "white pages," including an elaborate Star Wars-themed site, are bypassing Google's malvertising filters, showing up high in search results to lure users to second-stage phishing sites.

Source: Bits And Splits via Shtterstock

Threat actors appear to have found yet another innovative use case for artificial intelligence in malicious campaigns: to create decoy ads for fooling malvertising-detection engines on the Google Ads platform.

The scam involves attackers buying Google Search ads and using AI to create ad pages with unique content and absolutely nothing malicious about them. The goal is to use these decoy ads to then lure visitors to phishing sites for stealing credentials and other sensitive data.

With malvertising, threat actors create malicious ads that are rigged to surface high up in search engine results when people search for a particular product or service. The ads often spoof popular and trusted brands and involve webpages and content that are replicas of the originals but serve instead to redirect users to phishing pages or download an attacker's malware of choice on systems of users who interact with the malicious ads.

While many malvertisement campaigns are targeted at consumers, there have been several recently focused on corporate users as well. One example is a campaign that sought to distribute the Lobshot backdoor on corporate systems, and another that phished employees at Lowe's.

**A Steady, Post-Macro Increase in Malvertising**

"We are seeing more and more cases of fake content produced for deception purposes," researchers at Malwarebytes said in a report on the campaign this week. These so called "white pages," as they are being referred to in the criminal underground, serve as legitimate-looking decoys, or front-end webpages that hide malicious content and activities behind them, according to Malwarebytes.

Related:Manufacturers Lose Azure Creds to HubSpot Phishing Attack

"The content is unique and sometimes funny if you are a real human, but unfortunately a computer analyzing the code would likely give it a green check," Malwarebytes security researcher Jerome Segura wrote. White pages, incidentally, are in contrast to "black pages," which are the actual malicious landing pages containing harmful content or malware.

The use of AI to plant decoy content on Google Ads adds a new wrinkle to malvertising scams, which have seen a remarkable surge in volume recently. Malwarebytes has pinned the increase to Microsoft's decision in 2022 to block macros in Word, Excel, and PowerPoint files downloaded from the Internet — a top malware vector for threat actors. That decision forced attackers to look for other malware distribution vectors, one of which happens to be malvertising, according to Malwarebytes.

Though Google and operators of other major online ad distribution networks have been battling against the scourge — and have gotten better at quickly identifying and removing malvertising content — bad actors have consistently managed to remain a step ahead. A Malwarebytes study found Amazon to be the most spoofed brand in malvertising campaigns, followed by Rufus, Weebly, NotePad++, and TradingView.

Related:CISA Directs Federal Agencies to Secure Cloud Environments

**Spoofing Brands With AI-Generated Content**

In its report, Malwarebytes provided two examples of AI-generated decoy ads it spotted recently on Google Ads. One of the decoy ads targeted users searching the Internet for the Securitas OneID mobile app, and the other targeted users of the Parsec remote desktop app, which is popular among gamers.

The Securitas OneID scam involved an entirely AI-generated website, complete with AI-generated images of supposed executives of the company.

"When Google tries to validate the ad, they will see this cloaked page with pretty unique content and there is absolutely nothing malicious within it," Segura wrote.

With the Parsec ad, the threat actors used some creative license of their own to generate a heavily Star Wars\-influenced website, replete with references to the parsec astronomical measurement unit. The artwork for the website even included several AI-generated Star Wars-themed posters, which while impressive, would likely have suggested to users that the site had nothing to do with the legitimate Parsec app.

Related:Azure Data Factory Bugs Expose Cloud Infrastructure

"Ironically, it is quite straightforward for a real human to identify much of the cloaked content as just fake fluff. Sometimes, things just don’t add up and are simply comical," Segura wrote. Even so, as a cloaking mechanism for a malvertising campaign," he added, "the website would have passed Google's validation checks.

**About the Author**

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year career at Computerworld, Jai also covered a variety of other technology topics, including big data, Hadoop, Internet of Things, e-voting, and data analytics. Prior to Computerworld, Jai covered technology issues for The Economic Times in Bangalore, India. Jai has a Master's degree in Statistics and lives in Naperville, Ill.

Malvertisers Fool Google With AI-Generated Decoy Content

Protect yourself from sophisticated phishing attacks that leverage Google Calendar to steal your personal information.

**KEY SUMMARY POINTS**

*   **Google Calendar Targeted:** Hackers are exploiting Google Calendar’s features to send phishing emails disguised as legitimate invites.

*   **Sophisticated Tactics:** Attacks leverage tools like Google Forms and Google Drawings to bypass traditional email security and enhance credibility.

*   **Widespread Impact:** Over 4,000 phishing emails linked to this campaign were detected in a four-week period, affecting around 300 brands.

*   **Social Engineering:** Cybercriminals use urgency, fear, and impersonation to trick victims into clicking malicious links and entering sensitive information.

*   **Preventive Measures:** Advanced email security, monitoring third-party app usage, and behavior analytics are essential to mitigate these evolving threats.

According to the latest research from Check Point, shared with Hackread.com, a widely used scheduling tool called Google Calendar has become the newest target for cybercriminals.

For your information, Google Calendar is part of **Google Workspace** (formerly known as G Suite). It is a popular tool for organizing schedules and managing time used by over 500 million people in 41 languages.

According to CPR’s research, attackers are manipulating Google Calendar and its associated features, like Google Drawings, to launch phishing attacks by sending seemingly legitimate emails with links that bypass traditional email security measures. These links appear to connect to Google Forms or Google Drawings, further enhancing the attack’s credibility.

The malicious email and Google Calendar setup (Via CPR)

Initially, they exploited the user-friendly features inherent in Google Calendar, offering links connecting to Google Forms. However, after observing that security products could flag malicious Calendar invites, they evolved the attack to align with Google Drawings capabilities.

“Cyber criminals are modifying “sender” headers, making emails look as though they were sent via Google Calendar on behalf of a known and legitimate individual. Roughly 300 brands have been affected by this campaign thus far, with cyber researchers observing over 4,000 of these phishing emails in a four-week period,” revealed Check Point’s **blog post**.

The attackers leverage the trust and familiarity associated with Google Calendar to lure victims into clicking malicious links. They create a seemingly legitimate calendar invite, often from a known contact or a familiar organization. This initial invite may contain a link to a Google Form Google Drawing or ICS file attachment, which appears to be a simple request for information or a survey, often displaying a **CAPTCHA** or support button.

However, once the victim clicks on the link, they are redirected to a malicious website designed to steal personal information or corporate data through a fake authentication process, potentially leading to financial scams. This website might mimic a legitimate login page, a cryptocurrency exchange, or a tech support page.

The goal is to trick the victim into entering sensitive information like passwords, credit card details, or personal identification numbers. Stolen information can be used for credit card fraud or unauthorized transactions, posing significant risks to both parties.

It is worth noting that the attackers often use social engineering tactics to increase the credibility of the attack. They might create a sense of urgency, fear, or curiosity to entice victims to click on the malicious link. They may also impersonate trusted individuals or organizations to gain the victim’s trust.

To stay protected from phishing threats, organizations should implement advanced email security solutions, **monitor third-party Google App usage**, implement strong authentication mechanisms, and use behavior analytics tools to detect unusual login attempts or suspicious activities to ensure a secure and secure online environment for all users.

1.  **Google Workspace Vulnerable to Takeover**
2.  **Misconfigured Google Groups Settings Leak Sensitive Data**
3.  **Google Chrome mobile phishing scam can steal private data**
4.  **Scammers Weaponize Google Forms in New BazarCall Attack**
5.  **Threat actors using Google Docs exploit to spread phishing links**

Google Calendar Phishing Scam Targets Users with Malicious Invites

Cybercriminals are using advanced techniques to target executives with mobile-specific phishing attacks.

****KEY SUMMARY POINTS****

*   **Targeted Attacks:** Sophisticated spear phishing campaigns are increasingly targeting corporate executives via mobile devices, using social engineering tactics.

*   **Exploitation of Trust:** Attackers mimic legitimate services like DocuSign and Google, leveraging urgency and credibility to deceive victims.

*   **Advanced Techniques:** Campaigns use CAPTCHAs, mobile-specific fake login pages, and compromised domains to bypass detection mechanisms.

*   **Infrastructure Abuse:** Attackers utilize platforms like Cloudflare for SSL encryption and DDoS protection, complicating detection efforts.

*   **Proactive Defense:** Regular employee training, advanced mobile device management (MDM) solutions, and automated incident response platforms are critical to mitigating these threats.

Mobile devices have become a prime target for sophisticated phishing attacks, particularly those aimed at corporate executives. These targeted attacks, known as spear phishing, leverage social engineering tactics to steal valuable credentials and gain access to sensitive information.

The Phishing and Data Analytics Team at Zimperium uncovered a recent spear phishing campaign targeting executives. The attack involves using a mimicked legitimate DocuSign document requiring immediate review, a common tactic that exploits urgency and authority.

Spear phishing is a popular attack vector against corporate executives, compromising high-value credentials that grant access to sensitive data and systems. The attack begins with a seemingly innocent link disguised as a DocuSign document. The link used a legitimate domain (clickmethryvcom) to mask its origin, and once clicked initiates a series of redirects. First, it redirects to a compromised university website, leveraging its credibility to bypass detection. 

Screenshot of the DocuSign phishing email and the university’s landing page (Via Zimperium)

Researchers noted that attackers have used CAPTCHAs to prevent automated detection and implemented mobile-specific targeting. Moreover, if the link is accessed via a mobile device, the attack presents a fake Google sign-in page to steal credentials whereas desktops are redirected to legitimate Google sites. Another observation is that the phishing site (diitalwaveru) and its SSL certificate were created just days before the attack, highlighting the attackers’ focus on rapid deployment.

Further probing as per Zimperium’s blog post, revealed that the attackers had utilized Cloudflare’s infrastructure for DDoS protection, SSL encryption, and fast content delivery, making it harder to detect. And, in addition to email-based attacks, the campaign also used PDF documents containing embedded phishing URLs. These PDFs mimicked legitimate DocuSign workflows, bypassing traditional URL scanning and exploiting trust in business documents.

The incident highlights the evolving nature of mobile phishing attacks, with attackers investing heavily in infrastructure to bypass security controls, targeting mobile devices often overlooked in security strategies, and exploiting compromised domains for credibility. 

Therefore, it has become essential to conduct regular security awareness training programs to educate employees about the latest phishing tactics and best practices for identifying and avoiding such attacks. Organizations must also deploy advanced Mobile Device Management (MDM) solutions to enforce security policies, such as password complexity, screen lock timeouts, and remote wipe capabilities.

Mika Aalto, Co-Founder and CEO at Hoxhunt weighed in on the situation emphasizing the importance of proactive training for employees and management to identify and report phishing attacks, as technical tools alone may not catch all threats.

_“_The most important thing that companies can do is to shift left and equip senior management and employees with the skills and tools to recognize and safely report a mobile phishing (mishing) attack. We can hope that technical filters and endpoint detection and response technologies quickly develop to be able to pick up these highly obfuscated, native code-based Malware attacks and pinpoint irregular signals and traffic,_“_ said Mika.

_“_Ultimately, it comes down to people. Attackers will launch a complex attack with what might just be a simple phishing message. It’s up to people to be able to listen to that little voice in their head that is telling them that something is wrong and report suspicious messages as a matter of habit. From there, you want to have a platform that will automatically categorize and escalate their reports to the SOC for accelerated response,_“_ he explained.

1.  99% of UAE’s .ae Domains Exposed to Phishing and Spoofing
2.  Scammers Exploit Fake Domains in Dubai Police Phishing Scams
3.  Ongoing Phishing Attack Targets Employees Across 12 Industries
4.  Rockstar 2FA Phishing-as-a-Service Kit Hits Microsoft 365 Accounts
5.  Xiū gǒu Phishing Kit Hits UK, US, Japan, Australia Across Key Sectors

New Mobile Phishing Targets Executives with Fake DocuSign Links

A free VPN app called Big Mama is selling access to people’s home internet networks. Kids are using it to cheat in a VR game while researchers warn of bigger security risks.

In the hit virtual reality game _Gorilla Tag_, you swing your arms to pull your primate character around—clambering through virtual worlds, climbing up trees and, above all, trying to avoid an infectious mob of other gamers. If you’re caught, you join the horde. However, some kids playing the game claim to have found a way to cheat and easily “tag” opponents.

Over the past year, teenagers have produced video tutorials showing how to side-load a virtual private network (VPN) onto Meta’s virtual reality headsets and use the location-changing technology to get ahead in the game. Using a VPN, according to the tutorials, introduces a delay that makes it easier to sneak up and tag other players.

While the workaround is likely to be an annoying but relatively harmless bit of in-game cheating, there’s a catch. The free VPN app that the video tutorials point to, Big Mama VPN, is also selling access to its users’ home internet connections—with buyers essentially piggybacking on the VR headset’s IP address to hide their own online activity.

This technique of rerouting traffic, which is best known as a residential proxy and more commonly happens through phones, has become increasingly popular with cybercriminals who use proxy networks to conduct cyberattacks and use botnets. While the Big Mama VPN works as it is supposed to, the company’s associated proxy services have been heavily touted on cybercrime forums and publicly linked to at least one cyberattack.

Researchers at cybersecurity company Trend Micro first spotted Meta’s VR headsets appearing in its threat intelligence residential proxy data earlier this year, before tracking down that teenagers were using Big Mama to play _Gorilla Tag_. An unpublished analysis that Trend Micro shared with WIRED says its data shows that the VR headsets were the third most popular devices using the Big Mama VPN app, after devices from Samsung and Xiaomi.

“If you’ve downloaded it, there’s a very high likelihood that your device is for sale in the marketplace for Big Mama,” says Stephen Hilt, a senior threat researcher at Trend Micro. Hilt says that while Big Mama VPN may be being used because it is free, doesn’t require users to create an account, and apparently doesn’t have any data limits, security researchers have long warned that using free VPNs can open people up to privacy and security risks.

These risks may be amplified when that app is linked to a residential proxy. Proxies can “allow people with malicious intent to use your internet connection to potentially use it for their attacks, meaning that your device and your home IP address may be involved in a cyberattack against a corporation or a nation state,” Hilt says.

"Gorilla Tag is a place to have fun with your friends and be playful and creative—anything that disturbs that is not cool with us,” a spokesperson for Gorilla Tag creator Another Axiom says, adding they use “anti-cheat mechanisms” to detect suspicious behavior. Meta did not respond to a request for comment about VPNs being side-loaded onto its headsets.

**Proxies Rising**

Big Mama is made up of two parts: There’s the free VPN app, which is available on the Google Play store for Android devices and has been downloaded more than 1 million times. Then there’s the Big Mama Proxy Network, which allows people (among other options) to buy shared access to “real” 4G and home Wi-Fi IP addresses for as little as 40 cents for 24 hours.

Vincent Hinderer, a cyber threat intelligence team manager who has researched the wider residential proxy market at Orange Cyberdefense, says there are various scenarios where residential proxies are used, both for people who are having traffic routed through their devices and also those buying and selling proxy services. “It’s sometimes a gray zone legally and ethically,” Hinderer says.

For proxy networks, Hinderer says, one end of the spectrum is where networks could be used as a way for companies to scrape pricing details from their competitors' websites. Other uses can include ad verification or people scalping sneakers during sales. They may be considered ethically murky but not necessarily illegal.

At the other end of the scale, according to Orange’s research, residential proxy networks have broadly been used for cyber espionage by Russian hackers, in social engineering efforts, as part of DDoS attacks, phishing, botnets, and more. “We have cybercriminals using them knowingly,” Hinderer says of residential proxy networks generally, with Orange Cyberdefense having frequently seen proxy traffic in logs linked to cyberattacks it has investigated. Orange’s research did not specifically look at uses of Big Mama's services.

Some people can consent to having their devices used in proxy networks and be paid for their connections, Hinderer says, while others may be included because they agreed to it in a service’s terms and conditions—something research has long shown people don’t often read or understand.

Big Mama doesn’t make it a secret that people who use its VPN will have other traffic routed through their networks. Within the app it says it “may transport other customer’s traffic through” the device that’s connected to the VPN, while it is also mentioned in the terms of use and on a FAQ page about how the app is free.

The Big Mama Network page advertises its proxies as being available to be used for ad verification, buying online tickets, price comparison, web scraping, SEO, and a host of other use cases. When a user signs up, they’re shown a list of locations proxy devices are located in, their internet service provider, and how much each connection costs.

This marketplace, at the time of writing, lists 21,000 IP addresses for sale in the United Arab Emirates, 4,000 in the US, and tens to hundreds of other IP addresses in a host of other countries. Payments can only be made in cryptocurrency. Its terms of service say the network is only provided for “legal purposes,” and people using it for fraud or other illicit activities will be banned.

Despite this, cybercriminals appear to have taken a keen interest in the service. Trend Micro’s analysis claims Big Mama has been regularly promoted on underground forums where cybercriminals discuss buying tools for malicious purposes. The posts started in 2020. Similarly, Israeli security firm Kela has found more than 1,000 posts relating to the Big Mama proxy network across 40 different forums and Telegram channels.

Kela’s analysis, shared with WIRED, shows accounts called “bigmama\_network” and “bigmama” posted across at least 10 forums, including cybercrime forums such as WWHClub, Exploit, and Carder. The ads list prices, free trials, and the Telegram and other contact details of Big Mama.

It is unclear who made these posts, and Big Mama tells WIRED that it does not advertise.

Posts from these accounts also said, among other things, that “anonymous” bitcoin payments are available. The majority of the posts, Kela’s analysis says, were made by the accounts around 2020 and 2021. Although, an account called “bigmama\_network” has been posting on the clearweb Blackhat World SEO forum until October this year, where it has claimed its Telegram account has been deleted multiple times.

In other posts during the last year, according to the Kela analysis, cybercrime forum users have recommended Big Mama or shared tips about the configurations people should use. In April this year, security company Cisco Talos said it had seen traffic from the Big Mama Proxy, alongside other proxies, being used by attackers trying to brute force their way into a variety of company systems.

**Mixed Messages**

Big Mama has few details about its ownership or leadership on its website. The company’s terms of service say that a business called BigMama SRL is registered in Romania, although a previous version of its website from 2022, and at least one live page now, lists a legal address for BigMama LLC in Wyoming. The US-based business was dissolved in April and is now listed as inactive, according to the Wyoming Secretary of State’s website.

A person using the name Alex A responded to an email from WIRED about how Big Mama operates. In the email, they say that information about free users’ connections being sold to third parties through the Big Mama Network is “duplicated on the app market and in the application itself several times,” and people have to accept the terms of conditions to use the VPN. They say the Big Mama VPN is officially only available from the Google Play Store.

“We do not advertise and have never advertised our services on the forums you have mentioned,” the email says. They say they were not aware of the April findings from Talos about its network being used as part of a cyberattack. “We do block spam, DDOS, SSH as well as local network etc. We log user activity to cooperate with law enforcement agencies,” the email says.

The Alex A persona asked WIRED to send it more details about the adverts on cybercrime forums, details about the Talos findings, and information about teenagers using Big Mama on Oculus devices, saying they would be “happy” to answer further questions. However, they did not respond to any further emails with additional details about the research findings and questions about their security measures, whether they believe someone was impersonating Big Mama to post on cybercrime forums, the identity of Alex A, or who runs the company.

During its analysis, Trend Micro’s Hilt says that the company also found a security vulnerability within the Big Mama VPN, which could have allowed a proxy user to access someone’s local network if exploited. The company says it reported the flaw to Big Mama, which fixed it within a week, a detail Alex A confirmed.

Ultimately, Hilt says, there are potential risks whenever anyone downloads and uses a free VPN. “All free VPNs come with a trade-off of privacy or security concerns,” he says. That applies to people side-loading them onto their VR headsets. “If you’re downloading applications from the internet that aren't from the official stores, there’s always the inherent risk that it isn’t what you think it is. And that comes true even with Oculus devices.”

This VPN Lets Anyone Use Your Internet Connection. What Could Go Wrong?

The National Defense Authorization Act passed today, but lawmakers stripped language that would keep the Trump administration from wielding unprecedented authority to surveil Americans.

The US Senate passed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) on Wednesday after congressional leaders earlier this month stripped the bill of provisions designed to safeguard against excessive government surveillance. The “must-pass” legislation now heads to President Joe Biden for his expected signature.

The Senate’s 85–14 vote cements a major expansion of a controversial US surveillance program, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Biden’s signature will ensure that the Trump administration opens with the newfound power to force a vast range of companies to help US spies wiretap calls between Americans and foreigners abroad.

Despite concerns about unprecedented spy powers falling into the hands of controversial figures such as Kash Patel, who has vowed to investigate Donald Trump’s political enemies if confirmed to lead the FBI, Democrats in the end made little effort to rein in the program.

The Senate Intelligence Committee first approved changes to the 702 program this summer with an amendment aimed at clarifying newly added language that experts had cast as dangerously vague. The vague text was introduced into the law by Congress in April, with Democrats in the Senate promising to correct the issue later this year. Ultimately, those efforts proved to be in vain.

Legal experts began issuing warnings last winter over Congress’s efforts to expand FISA to cover a vast range of new businesses not originally subject to Section 702’s wiretap directives. While reauthorizing the program in April, Congress changed the definition of what the government considers an “electronic communications service provider,” a term applied to companies that can be compelled to install wiretaps on the government’s behalf.

Traditionally, “electronic communications service providers” refers to phone and email providers, such as AT&T and Google. But as a result of Congress redefining the term, the new limits of the government’s wiretap powers are unclear.

It is widely assumed that the changes were intended to help the National Security Agency (NSA) target communications stored on servers at US data centers. Due to the classified nature of the 702 program, however, the updated text purposefully avoids specifying which types of new businesses will be subject to government demands.

Marc Zwillinger, one of the few private attorneys to testify before the nation’s secret surveillance court, wrote in April that the changes to the 702 statute mean that “any US business could have its communications \[wiretapped\] by a landlord with access to office wiring, or the data centers where their computers reside,” thus expanding the 702 program “into a variety of new contexts where there is a particularly high likelihood that the communications of US citizens and other persons in the US will be ‘inadvertently’ acquired by the government.”

Despite such warnings, Senate Democrats rushed to reauthorize the 702 program in April with the nebulous language attached. In a floor speech urging his colleagues to temporarily disregard the concerns, Mark Warner, chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, vowed to amend the law again before the end of year. As of Wednesday it was clear he could no longer keep that pledge.

Text approved in June by Warner’s committee aimed to clarify the scope of the 702 program but was excised from the text of the NDAA earlier this month, reportedly at the urging of Ohio Republican Mike Turner, chair of the House Intelligence Committee, among others. WIRED reported in March that Turner had defended the 702 program during a closed briefing on Capitol Hill, using images of anti-war protesters at US universities to suggest that the spy powers were needed to ferret out potential ties between American students and Hamas. (No such ties have been reported.)

Wiretap orders issued under the 702 program permit the government to secretly eavesdrop on the calls and messages of foreigners, who generally lack any right to privacy under US law. The wiretaps, however, also routinely capture Americans in private conversation, despite constitutional limits that typically forbid such surveillance without a judge’s consent.

Notably, wiretap orders executed under Section 702 are never reviewed by a federal judge. Calls, texts, and emails collected under the program may be stored by the government for up to five years and will be accessed in some cases by the FBI. The bureau maintains its own Section 702 database, which is regularly used to develop leads in cases unrelated to why the wiretaps were originally collected.

An aide to Warner tells WIRED that the senator acknowledges that the changes to Section 702 this year are “overly broad,” adding that he’s aware the language must be “further narrowed.” Warner remains committed to fixing the law, said the aide, “whether it’s in this Congress or the next.”

The botched effort to check the government’s surveillance powers comes as the US national security establishment braces for what’s likely to be one of its most significant shakeups in decades. FBI director Chris Wray announced plans last week to voluntarily step down at the conclusion of Biden’s term, potentially clearing the way for a Republican-controlled Congress to fast-track Patel’s confirmation.

Patel has falsely accused Biden of rigging the 2020 presidential election and has vowed to bring cases “criminally or civilly” against members of the press. Trump has likewise pledged to investigate major news outlets that he has vaguely accused of “threatening treason.” Last week, Senate Republicans kneecapped an attempt by Democratic lawmakers to pass bipartisan legislation that would have shielded US journalists from government spying—likely a reaction to Trump issuing an command on Truth Social to “kill” the bill.

Privacy advocates on both sides of the aisle made failed attempts over the past year to limit the FBI’s access to Americans’ communications without a warrant. The calls for reform followed revelations that the 702 program had been inadvertently abused by FBI employees to conduct searches for the private messages of former and current federal officials, political commentators, and journalists. Other searches unlawfully performed at the FBI targeted a US senator, a state senator, and a state court judge.

According to the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, US intelligence analysts have also abused the program to investigate potential sexual partners and potential tenants.

While the 702 program purportedly exists to exclusively further the government’s counterintelligence goals, surveillance experts say its scope likely extends far beyond terrorism and cyber threats, encompassing activities described as falling under the broad scope of US “foreign affairs.” Foreign journalists, government officials, and citizens of friendly nations never accused of a crime are just as likely to be deemed legitimate targets as foreign criminals and members of known terrorist organizations.

A separate amendment excised by congressional leaders from the NDAA, known as as the “Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act,” was passed by the House of Representatives in April. Introduced initially as a standalone bill, the amendment would have banned the federal government from purchasing Americans’ location data without a warrant.

As WIRED has previously reported, US intelligence agencies have acknowledged purchasing large quantities of commercial data on US citizens, including information for which police normally require a warrant.

In a declassified report published last year, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence confirmed that the ocean of personal data being bought up by the government was highly sensitive, and that, in the wrong hands, it could be used to “facilitate blackmail” and other serious crimes.

Congress Again Fails to Limit Scope of Spy Powers in New Defense Bill

Attackers are using links to the popular Google scheduling app to lead users to pages that steal credentials, with the ultimate goal of committing financial fraud.

Source: Anatolii Babii via Alamy Stock Photo

Attackers are spoofing Google Calendar invites in a fast-spreading phishing campaign that can bypass email protections and aims to steal credentials, ultimately to defraud users for financial gain.

The campaign, discovered by researchers at Check Point Software, relies on modified "sender" headings to make emails appear as if they were sent via Google Calendar on behalf of a legitimate entity, such as a trusted brand or individual, they revealed in a blog post published Dec. 17.

Initially, messages included malicious Google Calendar .ics files that would lead to a phishing attack, the threat hunters wrote. However, "after observing that security products could flag malicious Calendar invites," attackers began aligning those files with links to Google Drawings and Google Forms to better disguise their activity.

**Mass-Scale Financial Scamming Is the Goal**

Given that Google Calendar is used by more than 500 million people and is available in 41 different languages, the campaign provides a massive attack surface, so "it is no wonder it has become a target for cybercriminals" seeking to compromise online accounts for financial gain, the team noted.

"After an individual unwittingly discloses sensitive data, the details are then applied to financial scams, where cybercriminals may engage in credit card fraud, unauthorized transactions or similar, illicit activities," the researchers wrote in the post. Stolen data also can be used to bypass security measures on other victim accounts to lead to further compromise, they added.

Related:Interpol: Can We Drop the Term 'Pig Butchering'?

Attackers also are moving fast with the campaign, with researchers observing more than 4,000 emails associated it in a four-week period. In those messages, attackers used references to about 300 brands in their fake invites to make them appear authentic, they wrote.

**What a Google Calendar Phish Looks Like**

A message associated with the campaign looks like a typical invite from Google Calendar in which someone known to or trusted by the individual targeted shares a calendar invite with them. The appearances of the messages vary, with some that really look almost identical to typical Google Calendar notifications, "while others use a custom format," the team wrote.

As noted previously, the emails include a calendar link or file (.ics) that includes a link to Google Forms or Google Drawings in an attempt to bypass email-scanning tools. Once a user takes the bait, they are then asked to click on another link, "which is often disguised as a fake reCAPTCHA or support button," that forwards them to a page "that looks like a cryptocurrency mining landing page or bitcoin support page," according to the post.

Related:Wallarm Releases API Honeypot Report Highlighting API Attack Trends

"These pages are actually intended to perpetrate financial scams," the team wrote. "Once users reach said page, they are asked to complete a fake authentication process, enter personal information, and eventually provide payment details."

**How to Avoid Becoming a "Google" Phishing Cyber Victim**

Check Point contacted Google about the campaign, which recommended that Google Calendar users enable the "known senders" setting in the app to help defend against this type of phishing. This setting will alert a user when they receive an invitation from someone not in their contact list or someone with whom they have not interacted with from their email address in the past, the company said.

Corporate defenders can used advanced email security solutions that can identify and block phishing attacks that manipulate trusted platforms with the inclusion of attachment scanning, URL reputation checks, and AI-driven anomaly detection, the Check Point team wrote.

Organizations also should monitor the use of third-party Google Apps and use cybersecurity tools that can specifically detect and warn its security teams about suspicious activity on third-party apps.

Related:Texas Tech Fumbles Medical Data in Massive Breach

Finally, two often-cited pieces advice for organizations when recommending phishing defense — the use of multifactor authentication (MFA) across business accounts and employee training on sophisticated phishing tactics — also can work in cases like this to shore up security.

**About the Author**

Elizabeth Montalbano is a freelance writer, journalist, and therapeutic writing mentor with more than 25 years of professional experience. Her areas of expertise include technology, business, and culture. Elizabeth previously lived and worked as a full-time journalist in Phoenix, San Francisco, and New York City; she currently resides in a village on the southwest coast of Portugal. In her free time, she enjoys surfing, hiking with her dogs, traveling, playing music, yoga, and cooking.

Phishers Spoof Google Calendar Invites in Fast-Spreading, Global Campaign

PRESS RELEASE

SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Wallarm, the leader in real-time blocking of API attacks, on Dec. 17 unveiled a comprehensive security research report based on data collected from the world's first globally distributed API honeypot network. The findings reveal critical insights into the growing threat landscape for APIs, showcasing their increasing vulnerability to rapid discovery and exploitation.

APIs have surpassed web applications as the primary targets of attackers, underscoring the urgency for businesses to implement robust API security measures. Organizations are plagued by uncontrolled API sprawl and lack of API governance, leading to significant breaches from exposed APIs. Wallarm’s study highlights several alarming trends that demand immediate attention from organizations deploying APIs.

Key Findings from the Report:

*   APIs Are the Prime Target: APIs now attract more attacks than traditional web applications.
    
*   Rapid Discovery: Newly deployed APIs are discovered by attackers in as little as 29 seconds.
    
*   Immediate Exploitation: Unprotected APIs are exploited within one minute of discovery.
    
*   High Velocity Data Theft: Attackers using batched API requests can exfiltrate millions of user records in seconds.
    
*   Targeting Well-Known Products: Recognizable and widely used API products face heightened targeting by attackers.
    

Related:Interpol: Can We Drop the Term 'Pig Butchering'?

Wallarm’s globally distributed honeypot, spanning 14 locations, captures data from diverse geographies and providers, revealing critical trends. The honeypot provides targeted responses to API requests across multiple protocols, including REST, XML-RPC, GraphQL, and others. Over half (54%) of observed request types were API-specific, demonstrating that APIs are the preferred vector for attackers. Among these, 40% of requests targeted known vulnerabilities (CVEs). While port 80 emerged as the most commonly discovered entry point, interactions were distributed across many ports, demonstrating that protecting only common ports is insufficient.

“This report sheds light on a rapidly evolving attack surface and represents a groundbreaking effort in API security research,” said Ivan Novikov, CEO and founder at Wallarm. “APIs are the foundation of modern applications, but their widespread deployment and inadequate protection make them an attractive target for attackers. We hope this research helps organizations invest in strong protection for their APIs.”

Wallarm’s full report offers actionable insights and recommendations to safeguard APIs. To access the full research report and learn more about securing your APIs, visit http://www.wallarm.com/resources/api-honeypot-report.

Related:Phishers Spoof Google Calendar Invites in Fast-Spreading, Global Campaign

Wallarm Releases API Honeypot Report Highlighting API Attack Trends

Pallet liquidation is an attractive playing field for online scammers. Will you receive goods or get your credit card details stolen?

Pallet liquidation scams target people looking to purchase pallets of supposedly discounted merchandise, often from major retailers like Amazon.

Groups that engage in pallet liquidation sales are rampant on social media and it’s hard to discern the scammers from the legitimate ones (to be honest, I’ve always thought they were all scams, until someone told me there are legitimate ones), let alone the grey area in between.

The scams are based on the fact that many products are returned and can not be sold again for various reasons. But companies also offer overstock and out-of-season apparel for sale. Most of these companies have the first buyers sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) so when you scroll through different legitimate liquidation websites and marketplaces the origin of the pallet is almost never stated.

Depending on the reason of sale and the origin, the pallets may include a large quantity of one product or a mix of products, such as overstock or discontinued items, customer returns, or refurbished goods.

Given that the pallet liquidation market is a billion-dollar industry, it inevitably attracts scammers seeking to grab a piece of the action without putting in the work or risk.

In social media groups that specialize in pallet liquidation, you’ll find advertisements that promise valuable merchandise at significantly discounted prices, such as electronics, tools, or other high-demand items.

Facebook pallet liquidation ad

You’ll also see sponsored ads on social media about pallet sales (note: these are almost always fake).

The risk of not receiving what you have paid for is an obvious one, but some of these scammers will go the extra mile and set up fake websites where they will try and harvest payment details.

**How to steer clear of pallet liquidation scams**

If you’re really looking to try your luck at this, there are a few tips that can help you get your money’s worth.

The first thing to keep in mind is the higher up you are in the chain, the better your chances of making a profit are. It usually also means buying large quantities (I’m talking about truckloads) and larger investments. And most sellers do not have a return policy. I realize the large shipments are not for everyone, so here are some things to remember:

**Red flags:**

Unbelievable prices. The people you’re buying from are not stupid. If they are offering goods for unbelievable prices, don’t take their word for it.

Payment methods. Sellers who insist on payment methods that do not offer buyer protection are likely scammers.

Only payment options without buyer protection

Lack of manifest. Sellers that are unwilling to disclose any information about the content of a pallet shouldn’t be trusted. There is definitely a higher risk of damaged items.

Time pressure. Slogans like “Act now!” or “Only 3 left” are often used to create a false sense of urgency, hoping victims will purchase without applying the research below.

**Research the seller:**

Find **contact information** and check the validity. Legitimate liquidation sites provide clear and easily accessible contact details, including physical address, phone number, and email address. Be wary of sites that lack this information or provide vague or unreliable contact details.

Verify the **physical address** of the liquidation site through online maps or directories. A legitimate company is more likely to have a verifiable physical presence. After all, you can hardly receive these pallets in a PO box.

For a website you can use online tools to find the **domain age and registration**. Legitimate domains have a longer history so they are easier to research. New domains should be regarded as suspicious, since scammers have the habit of moving on to the next domain leaving bad reviews behind.

Check if the website is listed on the Better Business Bureau (BBB) website and **review their rating and any associated complaints**. It also allows you to check how long they’ve been in business.

Do an **online search** for the name of the company and combine it with terms like “scam” or “complaint” to help you find problems others may have run into in dealing with this company.

Don’t trust **sponsored ads.** We have heard of scammers that can afford to pay millions to advertise on Meta, Google, and other platforms and still make a handsome profit.

Use **web protection** like Malwarebytes Browser Guard. It flags malicious websites and credit card skimmers that steal your information.

**Too late?**

If you suspect that your payment card details have been stolen, these are the recommended actions:

*   Regularly check account and card statements and notify your bank about any suspicious activity.
*   Where possible, set up fraud alerts with your bank or payment card provider.
*   Change the password and enable multi-factor authentication if you haven’t already.
*   Freeze your credit so nobody can open any new accounts in your name.

**We don’t just report on threats – we help safeguard your entire digital identity**

Cybersecurity risks should never spread beyond a headline. Protect your—and your family’s—personal information by using identity protection.

 Pallet liquidation scams and how to recognize them 

KEY SUMMARY POINTS Cybersecurity researchers Dr. Web have uncovered a new and active Linux malware campaign aimed at…

****KEY SUMMARY POINTS****

*   **New Linux Malware Campaign**: Cybersecurity researchers identified an active Linux malware campaign leveraging eBPF technology and targeting businesses and users globally.

*   **eBPF Exploitation**: Hackers are abusing eBPF’s low-level capabilities to hide activities, gather data, and bypass security measures, making detection challenging.

*   **Trojan Deployment**: Attackers use eBPF rootkits to conceal their presence and drop remote access Trojans capable of tunnelling traffic and maintaining communication within private networks.

*   **Public Platforms for Command Control**: Instead of private servers, malware configurations are stored on public platforms like GitHub and blogs, disguising malicious activity as legitimate.

*   **Rising eBPF Malware**: The use of eBPF-based malware, including families like Boopkit and BPFDoor, is increasing, with over 100 new vulnerabilities discovered in 2024 alone.

Cybersecurity researchers Dr. Web have uncovered a new and active Linux malware campaign aimed at businesses and users in Southeast Asia. The discovery came during an investigation into a malware attack reported by one of their clients.

The investigation began when a client approached Dr. Web with concerns about a possible compromise in their computer infrastructure. Upon analyzing the client’s data, Dr. Web identified multiple similar cases, indicating a large-scale and active campaign. Despite the initial uncertainty about how the attackers gained access, the researchers successfully tracked the initial stages of the attack.

****Exploiting eBPF Technology****

Researchers found that hackers have been abusing eBPF (extended Berkeley Packet Filter) technology in their attacks. For your information, eBPF is originally designed to provide better control over the Linux operating system’s network functions.

What’s noteworthy is the growing attention around eBPF, especially after August 2021, when tech giants like Google, Isovalent, Meta, Microsoft, and Netflix collaborated to establish the eBPF Foundation under the Linux Foundation to support the growth and adoption of eBPF technologies.

However, in the ongoing attack, eBPF’s low-level capabilities have allowed attackers to hide network activity, gather sensitive information, and bypass security measures. This has made it difficult for researchers to detect, and a lucrative opportunity for hackers particularly for advanced persistent threat (APT) groups looking to maintain long-term access to a target system.

In this specific campaign, as detailed by Dr. Web in its report published on December 10, the attackers used eBPF to load two rootkits. The first, an eBPF rootkit, hid the presence of a second rootkit, which then dropped a remote access Trojan (Trojan.Siggen28.58279 or Trojan:Win32/Siggen.GR!MTB) capable of tunnelling traffic, allowing attackers to communicate with infected devices even within private networks.

****Hiding in Plain Sight: Public Platforms as Command Centers****

The threat actors have also changed how they store their malware configurations. Instead of relying on private command-and-control servers, they are using popular, publicly accessible platforms.

The malware analyzed by Dr. Web was found retrieving settings from platforms like GitHub and even a Chinese cybersecurity blog. This tactic makes the malicious traffic appear legitimate, as it combines it with normal network activity. It also eliminates the need for the attackers to maintain separate control infrastructure, which can be more easily detected and shut down.

Screenshot shows malware hosted on GitHub and a Cybersecurity blog in Chinese language (Via Dr. Web)

Nevertheless, since 2023, the use of malicious eBPF software has been on the rise, with several malware families emerging, including Boopkit, BPFDoor, and Symbiote. The discovery of numerous vulnerabilities in eBPF technology has further worsened the situation.

This ongoing cyberattack is yet another example of how far government-backed hackers and cybercriminals are willing to go without fear of consequences. Their tactics, including exploiting advanced technologies like eBPF and using public platforms for configuration storage, make this quite clear.

1.  Telegram-Controlled TgRat Trojan Targets Linux Servers
2.  Play Ransomware Variant Targeting Linux ESXi Environments
3.  North Korean Hackers Deploy Linux Malware for ATM Cashouts
4.  Linux Malware ‘Perfctl’ Targets Millions by Mimicking System Files
5.  Godot Engine Abused to Drop Malware on Windows, macOS, Linux

Tag

#google