Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Source

ghsa

GHSA-7w8p-chxq-2789: Deno.env.toObject() ignores the variables listed in --deny-env and returns all environment variables

### Summary The [Deno.env.toObject](https://docs.deno.com/api/deno/~/Deno.Env.toObject) method ignores any variables listed in the `--deny-env` option of the `deno run` command. When looking at the [documentation](https://docs.deno.com/runtime/fundamentals/security/#environment-variables) of the `--deny-env` option this might lead to a false impression that variables listed in the option are impossible to read. ### PoC ``` export AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=my-secret-aws-key # Works as expected. The program stops with a "NotCapable" error message echo 'console.log(Deno.env.get("AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY"));' | deno run \ --allow-env \ --deny-env=AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID,AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY - # All enviroment variables are printed and the --deny-env list is completely disregarded echo 'console.log(Deno.env.toObject());' | deno run \ --allow-env \ --deny-env=AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID,AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY - ``` The first example using `get` exits with the following error: ``` error: Uncaught (in p...

ghsa
#js#aws
GHSA-xqxc-x6p3-w683: Deno run with --allow-read and --deny-read flags results in allowed

### Summary `deno run --allow-read --deny-read main.ts` results in allowed, even though 'deny' should be stronger. Same with all global unary permissions given as `--allow-* --deny-*`. ### Details Caused by the fast exit logic in #22894. ### PoC Run the above command expecting no permissions to be passed. ### Impact This only affects a nonsensical combination of flags, so there shouldn't be a real impact on the userbase.

GHSA-9jgg-88mc-972h: webpack-dev-server users' source code may be stolen when they access a malicious web site with non-Chromium based browser

### Summary Source code may be stolen when you access a malicious web site with non-Chromium based browser. ### Details The `Origin` header is checked to prevent Cross-site WebSocket hijacking from happening which was reported by CVE-2018-14732. But webpack-dev-server always allows IP address `Origin` headers. https://github.com/webpack/webpack-dev-server/blob/55220a800ba4e30dbde2d98785ecf4c80b32f711/lib/Server.js#L3113-L3127 This allows websites that are served on IP addresses to connect WebSocket. By using the same method described in [the article](https://blog.cal1.cn/post/Sniffing%20Codes%20in%20Hot%20Module%20Reloading%20Messages) linked from CVE-2018-14732, the attacker get the source code. related commit: https://github.com/webpack/webpack-dev-server/commit/72efaab83381a0e1c4914adf401cbd210b7de7eb (note that `checkHost` function was only used for Host header to prevent DNS rebinding attacks so this change itself is fine. This vulnerability does not affect Chrome 94+ (and othe...

GHSA-4v9v-hfq4-rm2v: webpack-dev-server users' source code may be stolen when they access a malicious web site

### Summary Source code may be stolen when you access a malicious web site. ### Details Because the request for classic script by a script tag is not subject to same origin policy, an attacker can inject `<script src="http://localhost:8080/main.js">` in their site and run the script. Note that the attacker has to know the port and the output entrypoint script path. Combined with prototype pollution, the attacker can get a reference to the webpack runtime variables. By using `Function::toString` against the values in `__webpack_modules__`, the attacker can get the source code. ### PoC 1. Download [reproduction.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/18426585/reproduction.zip) and extract it 2. Run `npm i` 3. Run `npx webpack-dev-server` 4. Open `https://e29c9a88-a242-4fb4-9e64-b24c9d29b35b.pages.dev/` 5. You can see the source code output in the document and the devtools console. ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d4dcdca-5d24-4c84-a7b4-feb1782bca09) The scr...

GHSA-33p9-3p43-82vq: Jupyter Core on Windows Has Uncontrolled Search Path Element Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability

## Impact On Windows, the shared `%PROGRAMDATA%` directory is searched for configuration files (`SYSTEM_CONFIG_PATH` and `SYSTEM_JUPYTER_PATH`), which may allow users to create configuration files affecting other users. Only shared Windows systems with multiple users and unprotected `%PROGRAMDATA%` are affected. ## Mitigations - upgrade to `jupyter_core>=5.8.1` (5.8.0 is patched but breaks `jupyter-server`) , or - as administrator, modify the permissions on the `%PROGRAMDATA%` directory so it is not writable by unauthorized users, or - as administrator, create the `%PROGRAMDATA%\jupyter` directory with appropriately restrictive permissions, or - as user or administrator, set the `%PROGRAMDATA%` environment variable to a directory with appropriately restrictive permissions (e.g. controlled by administrators _or_ the current user) ## Credit Reported via Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative as ZDI-CAN-25932

GHSA-2x3r-hwv5-p32x: Deno's AES GCM authentication tags are not verified

### Summary This affects AES-256-GCM and AES-128-GCM in Deno, introduced by commit [0d1beed](https://github.com/denoland/deno/commit/0d1beed). Specifically, the authentication tag is not being validated. This means tampered ciphertexts or incorrect keys might not be detected, which breaks the guarantees expected from AES-GCM. Older versions of Deno correctly threw errors in such cases, as does Node.js. Without authentication tag verification, AES-GCM degrades to essentially CTR mode, removing integrity protection. Authenticated data set with set_aad is also affected, as it is incorporated into the GCM hash (ghash) but this too is not validated, rendering AAD checks ineffective. ### PoC ```ts import { Buffer } from "node:buffer"; import { createCipheriv, createDecipheriv, randomBytes, scrypt, } from "node:crypto"; type Encrypted = { salt: string; iv: string; enc: string; authTag: string; }; const deriveKey = (key: string, salt: Buffer) => new Promise<Buffer>((res...

GHSA-v9m8-9xxp-q492: Auth0-PHP SDK Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability

**Overview** The Auth0 PHP SDK contains a vulnerability due to insecure deserialization of cookie data. If exploited, since SDKs process cookie content without prior authentication, a threat actor could send a specially crafted cookie containing malicious serialized data. **Am I Affected?** You are affected by this vulnerability if you meet the following preconditions: 1. Applications using the Auth0-PHP SDK, versions between 8.0.0-BETA3 to 8.3.0. 2. Applications using the following SDKs that rely on the Auth0-PHP SDK versions between 8.0.0-BETA3 to 8.3.0: a. Auth0/symfony, b. Auth0/laravel-auth0, c. Auth0/wordpress. **Fix** Upgrade Auth0/Auth0-PHP to 8.3.1. **Acknowledgement** Okta would like to thank Andreas Forsblom for discovering this vulnerability.

GHSA-4p4w-6hg8-63wx: AngularJS Incomplete Filtering of Special Elements vulnerability

Improper sanitization of the value of the 'href' and 'xlink:href' attributes in '<image>' SVG elements in AngularJS's 'ngSanitize' module allows attackers to bypass common image source restrictions. This can lead to a form of Content Spoofing https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Content_Spoofing  and also negatively affect the application's performance and behavior by using too large or slow-to-load images. This issue affects AngularJS versions greater than or equal to 1.3.1. Note: The AngularJS project is End-of-Life and will not receive any updates to address this issue. For more information see here https://docs.angularjs.org/misc/version-support-status .

GHSA-7633-x85h-5mqh: kro Confused Deputy vulnerability

kro (Kube Resource Orchestrator) 0.1.0 before 0.2.1 allows users (with permission to create or modify ResourceGraphDefinition resources) to supply arbitrary container images. This can lead to a confused-deputy scenario where kro's controllers deploy and run attacker-controlled images, resulting in unauthenticated remote code execution on cluster nodes.

GHSA-7v6m-28jr-rg84: Hibernate Validator may interpolate user-supplied input in a constraint violation message with Expression Language

Hibernate Validator before 6.2.0 and 7.0.0, by default and depending how it is used, may interpolate user-supplied input in a constraint violation message with Expression Language. This could allow an attacker to access sensitive information or execute arbitrary Java code. Hibernate Validator as of 6.2.0 and 7.0.0 no longer interpolates custom constraint violation messages with Expression Language and strongly recommends not allowing user-supplied input in constraint violation messages. CVE-2020-5245 and CVE-2025-4428 are examples of related, downstream vulnerabilities involving Expression Language intepolation of user-supplied data.