#auth

TP-Link has released security updates to address four security flaws impacting Omada gateway devices, including two critical bugs that could result in arbitrary code execution. The vulnerabilities in question are listed below - CVE-2025-6541 (CVSS score: 8.6) - An operating system command injection vulnerability that could be exploited by an attacker who can log in to the web management

The safe function `index_of_ptr` causes undefined behavior when called with an empty slice. The issue occurs in the line `ptr.add(slice.len() - 1)` which underflows when `slice.len()` is 0, creating a pointer with a massive offset. According to Rust's safety rules, creating such a pointer causes immediate undefined behavior.

The servicenow config URL is using a generic django View with no authentication. URL: `/plugins/ssot/servicenow/config/` ### Impact _What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_ An Unauthenticated attacker could access this page to view the Service Now public instance name e.g. `companyname.service-now.com`. This is considered **low-value information**. This does not expose the Secret, the Secret Name, or the Secret Value for the Username/Password for Service-Now.com. An unauthenticated member would not be able to change the instance name, nor set a Secret. There is not a way to gain access to other pages Nautobot through the unauthenticated Configuration page. ### Patches _Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_ We highly recommend upgrading to SSoT v3.10.0 which includes this patch. ### Workarounds _Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_ Disable the servicenow SSoT integration

code16 Sharp v9.6.6 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) src/Form/Fields/SharpFormUploadField.php.

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q3.0 through 2025.Q3.2, 2025.Q2.0 through 2025.Q2.12, 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.17, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.20, and 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.10 allows an remote non-authenticated attacker to inject JavaScript into the google_gadget.

Blockchain has finally made its way into traditional banking. For years, major banks wrote it off as a…

Improper Authentication in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions allows remote attackers to send malicious data to the Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions that will treat it as trusted data via unauthenticated cluster messages.

ProcessWire CMS 3.0.246 allows a low-privileged user with lang-edit to upload a crafted ZIP to Language Support that is auto-extracted without limits prior to validation, enabling resource-exhaustion Denial of Service.

Refunds in general can be enabled through the administration setting `core.cart.enableOrderRefunds` (in the cart panel).Which visually shows and hides the button. However, using a custom crafted request, a customer can still cancel his own orders.As this is not checked inside the route (and also not in the controller): https://github.com/shopware/shopware/blob/trunk/src/Storefront/Controller/AccountOrderController.php#L98 https://github.com/shopware/shopware/blob/trunk/src/Core/Checkout/Order/SalesChannel/CancelOrderRoute.php To mitigate this, a check should be added to the `CancelOrderRoute` which verifies that the feature is enabled.

### Impact This vulnerability allows malicious actors to force the application server to send HTTP requests to both external and internal servers. In certain cases, this may lead to access to internal resources such as databases, file systems, or other services that are not supposed to be directly accessible from the internet. The overall impact of this vulnerability is considered limited, as the functionality is highly restricted and only processes IMG tags. #### Description Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) is a vulnerability that enables a malicious actor to manipulate an application server into performing HTTP requests to arbitrary domains. SSRF is commonly exploited to make the server initiate requests to its internal systems or other services within the same network, which are typically not exposed to external users. In some cases, SSRF can also be used to target external systems. A successful SSRF attack can result in unauthorized actions or access to data within the organiza...