#rce

Some 17 of the bugs are at high risk for exploits, including multiple remote code execution bugs in Office and SharePoint.

### Summary A command injection vulnerability exists in the `mcp-server-kubernetes` MCP Server. The vulnerability is caused by the unsanitized use of input parameters within a call to `child_process.execSync`, enabling an attacker to inject arbitrary system commands. Successful exploitation can lead to remote code execution under the server process's privileges. The server constructs and executes shell commands using unvalidated user input directly within command-line strings. This introduces the possibility of shell metacharacter injection (`|`, `>`, `&&`, etc.). ### Details The MCP Server exposes tools (`kubectl_scale`, `kubectl_patch` , `explain_resource`, etc) to perform several kubernetes operations. An MCP Client can be instructed to execute additional actions for example via prompt injection when asked to read pod logs. Below some example of vulnerable code and different ways to test this vulnerability including a real example of indirect prompt injection that can lead to ...

Microsoft has released its monthly security update for July 2025, which includes 132 vulnerabilities affecting a range of products, including 14 that Microsoft marked as “critical.”

### Summary A command injection vulnerability exists in the `node-code-sandbox-mcp` MCP Server. The vulnerability is caused by the unsanitized use of input parameters within a call to `child_process.execSync`, enabling an attacker to inject arbitrary system commands. Successful exploitation can lead to remote code execution under the server process's privileges on the host machine, bypassing the sandbox protection of running code inside docker. The server constructs and executes shell commands using unvalidated user input directly within command-line strings. This introduces the possibility of shell metacharacter injection (`|`, `>`, `&&`, etc.). ### Details The MCP Server exposes tools to run code inside a docker container. An MCP Client can be instructed to execute additional actions for example via indirect prompt injection when asked to generate code that read a file. Below some example of vulnerable code and different ways to test this vulnerability including a real example o...

Integer overflow or wraparound in Microsoft Graphics Component allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally.

**What actions do customers need to take to protect themselves from this vulnerability?** Customers who have disabled Automatic Extension Upgrades or would like to upgrade an extension immediately must manually update their Azure Monitor Agent to the latest version. For more information on how to perform a manual update, see Manage Azure Monitor Agent.

**How could an attacker exploit this vulnerability?** An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by tricking a user into sending a request to a malicious server via the Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Snap-in. This could result in the server returning malicious data that might cause arbitrary code execution on the user's system.

Use after free in Windows Connected Devices Platform Service allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

**According to the CVSS metric, user interaction is required (UI:R). What interaction would the user have to do?** An attacker must send the user a malicious file and convince them to open it.

Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.