Tag
#vulnerability
View CSAF 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CVSS v4 8.7 ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity Vendor: Hitachi Energy Equipment: Relion 670/650 and SAM600-IO Vulnerability: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling 2. RISK EVALUATION Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow attackers to cause a denial-of-service that disrupts critical functions in the device. 3. TECHNICAL DETAILS 3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS Hitachi Energy reports that the following products are affected: Hitachi Energy Relion 650: All versions from 2.2.4.0 to 2.2.4.4 Hitachi Energy Relion 650: All versions from 2.2.5.0 to 2.2.5.6 Hitachi Energy Relion 650: All versions from 2.2.6.0 to 2.2.6.2 Hitachi Energy Relion 670: 2.2.2.6 Hitachi Energy Relion 670: 2.2.3.7 Hitachi Energy Relion 670: All versions from 2.2.4.0 to 2.2.4.4 Hitachi Energy Relion 670: All versions from 2.2.5.0 to 2.2.5.6 Hitachi Energy Relion 670: All versions from 2.2.6.0 to 2.2.6.2 Hitachi Energy SAM600-IO: All versions from 2....
View CSAF 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CVSS v4 5.3 ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity Vendor: Hitachi Energy Equipment: Modular Switchgear Monitoring (MSM) Vulnerability: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') 2. RISK EVALUATION Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow attackers to execute untrusted code, potentially leading to unauthorized actions or system compromise. 3. TECHNICAL DETAILS 3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS Hitachi Energy reports the following products are affected: Hitachi Energy MSM: Version 2.2.9 and prior 3.2 VULNERABILITY OVERVIEW 3.2.1 IMPROPER NEUTRALIZATION OF INPUT DURING WEB PAGE GENERATION ('CROSS-SITE SCRIPTING') CWE-79 In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.2 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e., .html(), .append(), and others) may result in the execution of untrusted code. CVE-2020-11022 has b...
June Linux Patch Wednesday. This time, there are 598 vulnerabilities, almost half as many as in May. Of these, 355 are in the Linux Kernel. There are signs of exploitation in the wild for 3 vulnerabilities (CISA KEV). š» SFB ā Chromium (CVE-2025-2783)š» MemCor ā Chromium (CVE-2025-5419)š» CodeInj ā Hibernate Validator (CVE-2025-35036). This vulnerability is [ā¦]
Google has released security updates to address a vulnerability in its Chrome browser for which an exploit exists in the wild. The zero-day vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-6554 (CVSS score: N/A), has been described as a type confusing flaw in the V8 JavaScript and WebAssembly engine. "Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 138.0.7204.96 allowed a remote attacker to perform arbitrary
No cwe for this issue in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
At just 13 years old, Dylan became the youngest security researcher to collaborate with the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC). His journey into cybersecurity is inspiringārooted in curiosity, resilience, and a deep desire to make a difference. Early beginnings: From scratch to security Dylanās fascination with technology began early. Like many kids, he started with Scratchāa visual programming language for making simple games and animations.
Model Context Protocol (MCP) is a powerful protocol from Anthropic that defines how to connect large language models (LLMs) to external tools. It has quickly gained traction due to its ease of use and the benefits it adds in our use of AI. In this article we'll cover some of the potential security risks you'll encounter with MCP and how you can approach mitigating them.How MCP worksMCP does not directly connect LLMs with tools. The MCP client component accesses the LLM, and the MCP server component accesses the tools. One MCP client has access to one or more MCP servers. Users may connect any
The vulnerabilities, which have yet to be published, could allow a threat actor to hijack not only Bluetooth earbuds and headphones but also the devices connected to them.
### Summary A command injection vulnerability exists in the `git-mcp-server` MCP Server. The vulnerability is caused by the unsanitized use of input parameters within a call to `child_process.exec`, enabling an attacker to inject arbitrary system commands. Successful exploitation can lead to remote code execution under the server process's privileges. The server constructs and executes shell commands using unvalidated user input directly within command-line strings. This introduces the possibility of shell metacharacter injection (`|`, `>`, `&&`, etc.). ### Details The MCP Server exposes tools (`git_add`, `git_init`, `git_logs`, etcc) to perform several git operations. An MCP Client can be instructed to execute additional actions for example via indirect prompt injection when asked to read git logs. Below some example of vulnerable code and different ways to test this vulnerability including a real example of indirect prompt injection that can lead to arbitrary command injection...
Mattermost versions 10.5.x <= 10.5.5, 9.11.x <= 9.11.15, 10.8.x <= 10.8.0, 10.7.x <= 10.7.2, 10.6.x <= 10.6.5 fail to properly enforce channel member management permissions when adding participants to playbook runs. This allows authenticated users with member-level permissions to bypass system admin restrictions and add or remove users to/from private channels via the playbook run participants feature, even when the 'Manage Members' permission has been explicitly removed. This can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive channel content and allow guest users to gain channel management privileges.