Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Tag

#vulnerability

GHSA-hhw4-xg65-fp2x: serde_yml crate is unsound and unmaintained

Using `serde_yml::ser::Serializer.emitter` can cause a segmentation fault, which is unsound. The GitHub project for `serde_yml` was archived after unsoundness issues were raised. If you rely on this crate, it is highly recommended switching to a maintained alternative. ## Recommended alternatives - [`serde_norway`](https://crates.io/crates/serde_norway) - Maintained fork of `serde_yaml`, using `unsafe-libyaml-norway` - [`serde_yaml_ng`](https://crates.io/crates/serde_yaml_ng) - Maintained fork of `serde_yaml`, using unmaintained `unsafe-libyaml` ## Incomplete pure Rust alternatives These implementation do not rely on C `libyaml`. - [`serde_yaml2`](https://crates.io/crates/serde_yaml2) - [`yaml-peg`](https://crates.io/crates/yaml-peg)

ghsa
#vulnerability#web#git#auth
GHSA-gfxp-f68g-8x78: LibYML: `libyml::string::yaml_string_extend` is unsound and unmaintained

In version 0.0.4, `libyml::string::yaml_string_extend` was revised resulting in undefined behaviour, which is unsound. The GitHub project for `libyml` was archived after unsoundness issues were raised. If you rely on this crate, it is highly recommended switching to a maintained alternative. ## Recommended alternatives - [`libyaml-safer`](https://crates.io/crates/libyaml-safer) - [`unsafe-libyaml-norway`](https://crates.io/crates/unsafe-libyaml-norway) - Maintained fork of `unsafe-libyaml`

GHSA-95hm-pr6q-298w: fast-able is vulnerable to DoS attack through insecure method

The public accessible struct SyncVec has a public safe method get_unchecked. It accept a parameter index and used in the get_unchecked without sufficient checks as mentioned [here](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.slice.html#method.get_unchecked).

GHSA-r45v-2289-jgr4: Liferay Portal has stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions allows remote authenticated attackers with the instance administrator role to inject arbitrary web script or HTML into all pages via a crafted payload injected into the Instance Configuration's (1) CDN Host HTTP text field or (2) CDN Host HTTPS text field.

GHSA-2gcv-3qpf-c5qr: Chaos Controller Manager is vulnerable to OS command injection

The cleanIptables mutation in Chaos Controller Manager is vulnerable to OS command injection. In conjunction with CVE-2025-59358, this allows unauthenticated in-cluster attackers to perform remote code execution across the cluster.

GHSA-2gg8-85m5-8r2p: Chaos Mesh's Chaos Controller Manager is Missing Authentication for Critical Function

The Chaos Controller Manager in Chaos Mesh exposes a GraphQL debugging server without authentication to the entire Kubernetes cluster, which provides an API to kill arbitrary processes in any Kubernetes pod, leading to cluster-wide denial of service.

GHSA-369h-6j28-wwcg: Chaos Controller Manager is vulnerable to OS command injection

The cleanTcs mutation in Chaos Controller Manager is vulnerable to OS command injection. In conjunction with CVE-2025-59358, this allows unauthenticated in-cluster attackers to perform remote code execution across the cluster.

GHSA-xv9f-728h-9jgv: Chaos Controller Manager is vulnerable to OS command injection

The killProcesses mutation in Chaos Controller Manager is vulnerable to OS command injection. In conjunction with CVE-2025-59358, this allows unauthenticated in-cluster attackers to perform remote code execution across the cluster.

GHSA-3vcm-c42p-3hhf: Mattermost Missing Authorization vulnerability

Mattermost versions 10.10.x <= 10.10.1 fail to properly sanitize user data during shared channel membership synchronization, which allows malicious or compromised remote clusters to access sensitive user information via unsanitized user objects. This vulnerability affects Mattermost Server instances with shared channels enabled.

6 Browser-Based Attacks Security Teams Need to Prepare For Right Now

Attacks that target users in their web browsers have seen an unprecedented rise in recent years. In this article, we’ll explore what a “browser-based attack” is, and why they’re proving to be so effective.  What is a browser-based attack? First, it’s important to establish what a browser-based attack is. In most scenarios, attackers don’t think of themselves as attacking your web browser.