#vulnerability

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability with audit events in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.117, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.5, 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.10, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allows remote authenticated users to from one virtual instance to view the audit events from a different virtual instance via the _com_liferay_portal_security_audit_web_portlet_AuditPortlet_auditEventId parameter.

### Impact send hooks can spend more gas than what's remained in tx, combined with recursive calls in the wasm contract, can amplify the gas consumption exponentially. ### Patches It's patched in v4.0.2 and v5.0.0 ### Workarounds _Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_

A group of academics from KU Leuven and the University of Birmingham has demonstrated a new vulnerability called Battering RAM to bypass the latest defenses on Intel and AMD cloud processors. "We built a simple, $50 interposer that sits quietly in the memory path, behaving transparently during startup and passing all trust checks," researchers Jesse De Meulemeester, David Oswald, Ingrid

Finance.js v4.1.0 contains a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability via the IRR function’s depth parameter. Improper handling of the recursion/iteration limit can lead to excessive CPU usage, causing application stalls or crashes.

An issue in finance.js v.4.1.0 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the seekZero() parameter.

An improper access control vulnerability in FormCms v0.5.4 in the /api/schemas/history/[schemaId] endpoint allows unauthenticated attackers to access historical schema data if a valid schemaId is known or guessed.

Improper handling of input could lead to a cross-site scripting (XSS) vector in the checkAttribute method of the input filter framework class.

### Summary A race condition in the repository credentials handler can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. ### Details The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the `util/db/repository_secrets.go` file. For example, in the `secretToRepoCred` function. The issue manifests as a concurrent map access panic: ``` concurrent map read and map write ... goroutine 1104 [running]: github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/v2/util/db.(*secretsRepositoryBackend).secretToRepoCred(0xc000e50ea8?, 0xc000c65540) /go/src/github.com/argoproj/argo-cd/util/db/repository_secrets.go:404 +0x31e ``` The race condition occurs due to: 1. Concurrent repository credential operations (create/update/delete) accessing the same map 2. Kubernetes informer re-syncs happening simultaneously 3. Background watchers updating the same secret data 4. No mutex protection for map access A valid API token with `repositories`...

### Summary A command injection vulnerability exists in the `figma-developer-mcp` MCP Server. The vulnerability is caused by the unsanitized use of input parameters within a call to `child_process.exec`, enabling an attacker to inject arbitrary system commands. Successful exploitation can lead to remote code execution under the server process's privileges. The server constructs and executes shell commands using unvalidated user input directly within command-line strings. This introduces the possibility of shell metacharacter injection (`|`, `>`, `&&`, etc.). ### Details The MCP Server exposes tools to perform several figma operations. An MCP Client can be instructed to execute additional actions for example via indirect prompt injection that can lead to command injection by calling vulnerable tools with malicious inputs. Below some example of vulnerable code and different ways to test this vulnerability. ### Vulnerable code The following snippet illustrates the vulnerable code ...