Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Source

ghsa

GHSA-q4w9-x3rv-4c8j: Mailgen has HTML Injection and XSS Filter Bypass in Plaintext Emails

### Summary An HTML injection vulnerability in plaintext emails generated by Mailgen has been discovered. Projecta are affected if the `Mailgen.generatePlaintext(email)` method is used and passed in user-generated content. The issue was discovered and reported by Edoardo Ottavianelli (@edoardottt). ### Details The following function (inside index.js) is intended to strip all HTML content to produce a plaintext string. ```javascript // Plaintext text e-mail generator Mailgen.prototype.generatePlaintext = function (params) { // Plaintext theme not cached? if (!this.cachedPlaintextTheme) { throw new Error('An error was encountered while loading the plaintext theme.'); } // Parse email params and get back an object with data to inject var ejsParams = this.parseParams(params); // Render the plaintext theme with ejs, injecting the data accordingly var output = ejs.render(this.cachedPlaintextTheme, ejsParams); // Definition of the <br /> tag ...

ghsa
#xss#vulnerability#apple#js#java
GHSA-fr8m-434r-g3xp: gnark-crypto doesn't range check input values during ECDSA and EdDSA signature deserialization

### Impact During deserialization of ECDSA and EdDSA signatures gnark-crypto did not check that the values are in the range `[1, n-1]` with `n` being the corresponding modulus (either base field modulus in case of `R` in EdDSA, and scalar field modulus in case of `s,r` in ECDSA and `s` in EdDSA). As this also allowed zero inputs, then it was possible to craft a signature which lead to null pointer dereference, leading to denial-of-service of an application. This also enabled weak signature malleability when the users assumed uniqueness of the serialized signatures (but not the underlying modulo reduced values). We are not aware of any users impacted by the bug. The implemented signature schemes in gnark-crypto complement the in-circuit versions in gnark, allowing to have end-to-end tests. ### Patches The issue was patched in PR #449. The fix returns an error during deserialization if the values do not belong to the ranges `[1, n-1]`. The fix is included in release v0.12.0 and upwa...

GHSA-rfh5-c9h5-q8jm: reflex-dev/reflex has an Open Redirect vulnerability

### Mitigation Make sure `GITHUB_CODESPACES_PORT_FORWARDING_DOMAIN` is not set in a production environment. So the following is correct: ``` assert os.getenv("GITHUB_CODESPACES_PORT_FORWARDING_DOMAIN") is None ``` ### **Vulnerability Description** --- **Vulnerability Overview** - When the GET /auth-codespace page loads in a GitHub Codespaces environment, it automatically assigns the redirect_to query parameter value directly to client-side links without any validation and triggers automatic clicks. This allows attackers to redirect users to arbitrary external URLs. - The route is only registered when a Codespaces environment is detected, and the detection is controlled by environment variables. This means that the same behavior can be activated in production if the corresponding environment variable is set. **Vulnerable Code Analysis** https://github.com/reflex-dev/reflex/blob/51f9f2c2f52cac4d66c07683a12bc0237311b6be/reflex/utils/codespaces.py#L18-L46 - This code assigns th...

GHSA-gwq6-fmvp-qp68: Microsoft Security Advisory CVE-2025-55248: .NET Information Disclosure Vulnerability

# Microsoft Security Advisory CVE-2025-55248 | .NET Information Disclosure Vulnerability ## <a name="executive-summary"></a>Executive summary Microsoft is releasing this security advisory to provide information about a vulnerability in .NET 8.0 and .NET 9.0. This advisory also provides guidance on what developers can do to update their applications to remove this vulnerability. A MITM (man in the middle) attacker may prevent use of TLS between client and SMTP server, forcing client to send data over unencrypted connection. ## Announcement Announcement for this issue can be found at https://github.com/dotnet/announcements/issues/372 ## <a name="mitigation-factors"></a>Mitigation factors Microsoft has not identified any mitigating factors for this vulnerability. ## <a name="affected-software"></a>Affected software * Any .NET 8.0 application running on .NET 8.0.20 or earlier. * Any .NET 9.0 application running on .NET 9.0.9 or earlier. ## <a name="affected-packages"></a>Affected...

GHSA-w3q9-fxm7-j8fq: Microsoft Security Advisory CVE-2025-55247 | .NET Denial of Service Vulnerability

# Microsoft Security Advisory CVE-2025-55247 | .NET Denial of Service Vulnerability ## <a name="executive-summary"></a>Executive summary Microsoft is releasing this security advisory to provide information about a vulnerability in .NET 8.0.xxx, .NET 9.0.xxx and .NET 10.0.xxx. This advisory also provides guidance on what developers can do to update their environments to remove this vulnerability. A vulnerability exists in .NET where predictable paths for MSBuild's temporary directories on Linux let another user create the directories ahead of MSBuild, leading to DoS of builds. This only affects .NET on Linux operating systems. ## Announcement Announcement for this issue can be found at https://github.com/dotnet/announcements/issues/370 ### <a name="mitigation-factors"></a>Mitigation factors Projects which do not utilize the [DownloadFile](https://learn.microsoft.com/visualstudio/msbuild/downloadfile-task) build task are not susceptible to this vulnerability. ## <a name="affect...

GHSA-pgp9-98jm-wwq2: alloy-dyn-abi has DoS vulnerability on `alloy_dyn_abi::TypedData` hashing

### Impact An uncaught panic triggered by malformed input to `alloy_dyn_abi::TypedData` could lead to a denial-of-service (DoS) via `eip712_signing_hash()`. Software with high availability requirements such as network services may be particularly impacted. If in use, external auto-restarting mechanisms can partially mitigate the availability issues unless repeated attacks are possible. ### Patches The vulnerability was patched by adding a check to ensure the element is not empty before accessing its first element; an error is returned if it is empty. The fix is included in version [`v1.4.1`](https://crates.io/crates/alloy-dyn-abi/1.4.1) and backported to [`v0.8.26`](https://crates.io/crates/alloy-dyn-abi/0.8.26). ### Workarounds There is no known workaround that mitigates the vulnerability. Upgrading to a patched version is the recommended course of action. ### Reported by Christian Reitter & Zeke Mostov from [Turnkey](https://www.turnkey.com/)

GHSA-jq43-27x9-3v86: Netty has SMTP Command Injection Vulnerability that Allows Email Forgery

### Summary An SMTP Command Injection (CRLF Injection) vulnerability in Netty's SMTP codec allows a remote attacker who can control SMTP command parameters (e.g., an email recipient) to forge arbitrary emails from the trusted server. This bypasses standard email authentication and can be used to impersonate executives and forge high-stakes corporate communications. ### Details The root cause is the lack of input validation for Carriage Return (\r) and Line Feed (\n) characters in user-supplied parameters. The vulnerable code is in io.netty.handler.codec.smtp.DefaultSmtpRequest, where parameters are directly concatenated into the SMTP command string. For example, when SmtpRequests.rcpt(recipient) is called, a malicious recipient string containing CRLF sequences can inject a new, separate SMTP command. Because the injected commands are sent from the server's trusted IP, any resulting emails will likely pass SPF and DKIM checks, making them appear legitimate to the victim's email clien...

GHSA-6p6v-m64v-jx8q: Apache Spark has Inadequate Encryption Strength

This issue affects Apache Spark versions before 3.4.4, 3.5.2 and 4.0.0. Apache Spark versions before 4.0.0, 3.5.2 and 3.4.4 use an insecure default network encryption cipher for RPC communication between nodes. When spark.network.crypto.enabled is set to true (it is set to false by default), but spark.network.crypto.cipher is not explicitly configured, Spark defaults to AES in CTR mode (AES/CTR/NoPadding), which provides encryption without authentication. This vulnerability allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to modify encrypted RPC traffic undetected by flipping bits in ciphertext, potentially compromising heartbeat messages or application data and affecting the integrity of Spark workflows. To mitigate this issue, users should either configure spark.network.crypto.cipher to AES/GCM/NoPadding to enable authenticated encryption or enable SSL encryption by setting spark.ssl.enabled to true, which provides stronger transport security.

GHSA-9f2h-7v79-mxw3: Parse Javascript SDK vulnerable to prototype pollution in `Parse.Object` and internal APIs

### Summary Prototype pollution capabilities on various APIs. ### Details Injection of malicious payload allows attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. `Parse.Object` and internal APIs are affected, specifically: - `ParseObject.fromJSON` - `ParseObject.pin` - `ParseObject.registerSubclass` - `ObjectStateMutations` (internal) - `encode`/`decode` (internal) ### PoC Demonstrative tests added as part of the fix. ### References - https://github.com/parse-community/Parse-SDK-JS/security/advisories/GHSA-9f2h-7v79-mxw3 - Patch https://github.com/parse-community/Parse-SDK-JS/releases/tag/7.0.0-alpha.1

GHSA-r4hh-pcgx-j5r2: Flowise: Authenticated Command Execution and Sandbox Bypass via Puppeteer and Playwright Packages

Flowise v3.0.1 < 3.0.8 and all versions after with 'ALLOW_BUILTIN_DEP' enabled contain an authenticated remote code execution vulnerability and node VM sandbox escape due to insecure use of integrated modules (Puppeteer and Playwright) within the nodevm execution environment. An authenticated attacker able to create or run a tool that leverages Puppeteer/Playwright can specify attacker-controlled browser binary paths and parameters. When the tool executes, the attacker-controlled executable/parameters are run on the host and circumvent the intended nodevm sandbox restrictions, resulting in execution of arbitrary code in the context of the host. **NOTE**: This vulnerability was incorrectly assigned as a duplicate CVE-2025-26319 and should be considered distinct from that identifier.