Source
ghsa
In Spring Security, versions 5.7.x prior to 5.7.12, 5.8.x prior to 5.8.11, versions 6.0.x prior to 6.0.9, versions 6.1.x prior to 6.1.8, versions 6.2.x prior to 6.2.3, an application is possible vulnerable to broken access control when it directly uses the AuthenticatedVoter#vote passing a null Authentication parameter. Specifically, an application is vulnerable if: The application uses AuthenticatedVoter directly and a null authentication parameter is passed to it resulting in an erroneous true return value. An application is not vulnerable if any of the following is true: * The application does not use AuthenticatedVoter#vote directly. * The application does not pass null to AuthenticatedVoter#vote. Note that AuthenticatedVoter is deprecated since 5.8, use implementations of AuthorizationManager as a replacement.
djangorestframework-simplejwt version 5.3.1 and before is vulnerable to information disclosure. A user can access web application resources even after their account has been disabled due to missing user validation checks via the for_user method.
Applications that use UriComponentsBuilder in Spring Framework to parse an externally provided URL (e.g. through a query parameter) AND perform validation checks on the host of the parsed URL may be vulnerable to a open redirect https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/601.html attack or to a SSRF attack if the URL is used after passing validation checks. This is the same as CVE-2024-22243 https://spring.io/security/cve-2024-22243, but with different input.
In Django 3.2 before 3.2.25, 4.2 before 4.2.11, and 5.0 before 5.0.3, the django.utils.text.Truncator.words() method (with html=True) and the truncatewords_html template filter are subject to a potential regular expression denial-of-service attack via a crafted string. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232 and CVE-2023-43665.
### Impact Vela pipelines can use variable substitution combined with insensitive fields like `parameters`, `image` and `entrypoint` to inject secrets into a plugin/image and — by using common substitution string manipulation — can bypass log masking and expose secrets without the use of the commands block. This unexpected behavior primarily impacts secrets restricted by the "no commands" option. This can lead to unintended use of the secret value, and increased risk of exposing the secret during image execution bypassing log masking. Given by the following substitution examples: using `parameters` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secrets: [ example_secret ] parameters: example: $${EXAMPLE_SECRET} ``` using `image` tag ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin>:latest${EXAMPLE_SECRET} secrets: [ example_secret ] ``` using `entrypoint` as a shim for `commands` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secre...
### Impact Vela pipelines can use variable substitution combined with insensitive fields like `parameters`, `image` and `entrypoint` to inject secrets into a plugin/image and — by using common substitution string manipulation — can bypass log masking and expose secrets without the use of the commands block. This unexpected behavior primarily impacts secrets restricted by the "no commands" option. This can lead to unintended use of the secret value, and increased risk of exposing the secret during image execution bypassing log masking. Given by the following substitution examples: using `parameters` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secrets: [ example_secret ] parameters: example: $${EXAMPLE_SECRET} ``` using `image` tag ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin>:latest${EXAMPLE_SECRET} secrets: [ example_secret ] ``` using `entrypoint` as a shim for `commands` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secre...
### Impact Vela pipelines can use variable substitution combined with insensitive fields like `parameters`, `image` and `entrypoint` to inject secrets into a plugin/image and — by using common substitution string manipulation — can bypass log masking and expose secrets without the use of the commands block. This unexpected behavior primarily impacts secrets restricted by the "no commands" option. This can lead to unintended use of the secret value, and increased risk of exposing the secret during image execution bypassing log masking. Given by the following substitution examples: using `parameters` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secrets: [ example_secret ] parameters: example: $${EXAMPLE_SECRET} ``` using `image` tag ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin>:latest${EXAMPLE_SECRET} secrets: [ example_secret ] ``` using `entrypoint` as a shim for `commands` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secre...
### Impact Vela pipelines can use variable substitution combined with insensitive fields like `parameters`, `image` and `entrypoint` to inject secrets into a plugin/image and — by using common substitution string manipulation — can bypass log masking and expose secrets without the use of the commands block. This unexpected behavior primarily impacts secrets restricted by the "no commands" option. This can lead to unintended use of the secret value, and increased risk of exposing the secret during image execution bypassing log masking. Given by the following substitution examples: using `parameters` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secrets: [ example_secret ] parameters: example: $${EXAMPLE_SECRET} ``` using `image` tag ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin>:latest${EXAMPLE_SECRET} secrets: [ example_secret ] ``` using `entrypoint` as a shim for `commands` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secre...
### Summary With the default configuration of tls-listener, a malicious user can open 6.4 `TcpStream`s a second, sending 0 bytes, and can trigger a DoS. ### Details The default configuration options make any public service using `TlsListener::new()` vulnerable to a slow-loris DoS attack. ```rust /// Default number of concurrent handshakes pub const DEFAULT_MAX_HANDSHAKES: usize = 64; /// Default timeout for the TLS handshake. pub const DEFAULT_HANDSHAKE_TIMEOUT: Duration = Duration::from_secs(10); ``` ### PoC Running the HTTP TLS server example: https://github.com/tmccombs/tls-listener/blob/6c57dea2d9beb1577ae4d80f6eaf03aad4ef3857/examples/http.rs, then running the following script will prevent new connections to the server. ```rust use std::{net::ToSocketAddrs, time::Duration}; use tokio::{io::AsyncReadExt, net::TcpStream, task::JoinSet}; #[tokio::main] async fn main() { const N: usize = 1024; const T: Duration = Duration::from_secs(10); let url = "127.0.0.1:3000"; ...
### Impact TurboBoost Commands has existing protections in place to guarantee that only public methods on Command classes can be invoked; however, the existing checks aren't as robust as they should be. It's possible for a sophisticated attacker to invoke more methods than should be permitted depending on the the strictness of authorization checks that individual applications enforce. Being able to call some of these methods can have security implications. #### Details Commands verify that the class must be a `Command` and that the method requested is defined as a public method; however, this isn't robust enough to guard against all unwanted code execution. The library should more strictly enforce which methods are considered safe before allowing them to be executed. ### Patches Patched in the following versions. - 0.1.3 - [NPM Package](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@turbo-boost/commands/v/0.1.3) - [Ruby GEM](https://rubygems.org/gems/turbo_boost-commands/versions/0.1.3) - 0.2....