ghsa

The package liquidjs before 10.0.0 is vulnerable to Information Exposure when `ownPropertyOnly` parameter is set to `False`, which results in leaking properties of a prototype. Workaround For versions 9.34.0 and higher, an option to disable this functionality is provided.

# Overview Versions `<=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library can be misconfigured so that passing a poorly implemented key retrieval function (referring to the `secretOrPublicKey` argument from the [readme link](https://github.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken#jwtverifytoken-secretorpublickey-options-callback)) will result in incorrect verification of tokens. There is a possibility of using a different algorithm and key combination in verification than the one that was used to sign the tokens. Specifically, tokens signed with an asymmetric public key could be verified with a symmetric HS256 algorithm. This can lead to successful validation of forged tokens. # Am I affected? You will be affected if your application is supporting usage of both symmetric key and asymmetric key in jwt.verify() implementation with the same key retrieval function. # How do I fix it? Update to version 9.0.0 # Will the fix impact my users? There is no impact for end users

# Overview In versions `<=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library, lack of algorithm definition in the `jwt.verify()` function can lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to the `none` algorithm for signature verification. # Am I affected? You will be affected if you do not specify algorithms in the `jwt.verify()` function # How do I fix it? Update to version 9.0.0 which removes the default support for the none algorithm in the `jwt.verify()` method. # Will the fix impact my users? There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you don’t need to allow for the `none` algorithm. If you need 'none' algorithm, you have to explicitly specify that in `jwt.verify()` options.

# Overview Versions `<=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library could be misconfigured so that legacy, insecure key types are used for signature verification. For example, DSA keys could be used with the RS256 algorithm. # Am I affected? You are affected if you are using an algorithm and a key type other than the combinations mentioned below | Key type | algorithm | |----------|------------------------------------------| | ec | ES256, ES384, ES512 | | rsa | RS256, RS384, RS512, PS256, PS384, PS512 | | rsa-pss | PS256, PS384, PS512 | And for Elliptic Curve algorithms: | `alg` | Curve | |-------|------------| | ES256 | prime256v1 | | ES384 | secp384r1 | | ES512 | secp521r1 | # How do I fix it? Update to version 9.0.0. This version validates for asymmetric key type and algorithm combinations. Please refer to the above mentioned algorithm / key type combinations for the valid secure co...

# Overview For versions `<=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library, if a malicious actor has the ability to modify the key retrieval parameter (referring to the `secretOrPublicKey` argument from the [readme link](https://github.com/auth0/node-jsonwebtoken#jwtverifytoken-secretorpublickey-options-callback)) of the `jwt.verify()` function, they can gain remote code execution (RCE). # Am I affected? You are affected only if you allow untrusted entities to modify the key retrieval parameter of the `jwt.verify()` on a host that you control. # How do I fix it? Update to version 9.0.0 # Will the fix impact my users? The fix has no impact on end users. # Credits [Palo Alto Networks](https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/)

rdiffweb prior to version 2.5.4 has an Open Redirect vulnerability.

Microweber versions 1.3.1 and prior are vulnerable to stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS). A patch is available on the 1.4, dev, and laravel-sail branches.

rdiffweb prior to version 2.5.4 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF).

A vulnerability has been found in Mingsoft MCMS 5.2.9 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function save of the component Article Handler. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-216499.

collective.contact.widget is an add-on is part of the collective.contact.* suite. A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in collective.contact.widget up to 1.12. This vulnerability affects the function title of the file src/collective/contact/widget/widgets.py. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The name of the patch is 5da36305ca7ed433782be8901c47387406fcda12. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-216496.