Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Source

ghsa

GHSA-h28c-453m-h9xm: Path Traversal in Payara

Payara through 5.2022.2 allows directory traversal without authentication. This affects Payara Server, Payara Micro, and Payara Server Embedded.

ghsa
#java#auth#maven
GHSA-mj5w-w588-j6xg: Use of Hard-coded Credentials in AgileConfig.Client

Hardcoded JWT Secret in AgileConfig <1.6.8 Server allows remote attackers to use the generated JWT token to gain administrator access.

GHSA-8cwq-4cmf-px73: PocketMine-MP invalid skin geometry JSON data leading to server crash

### Impact `pocketmine\entity\Skin` doesn't correctly handle errors produced by `adhocore/json-comment`, which throws `RuntimeException` rather than returning `false` as PocketMine-MP expects. This leads to a server crash if the skin geometry data is invalid for some reason (e.g. a syntax error). ### Patches c9626c610b8f6810c8c987559c9197b2a291f0bb ### Workarounds A plugin could handle `LoginPacket` and `PlayerSkinPacket` to verify the skin geometry data can be parsed correctly, so that the error condition in the core code is never reached. ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Email us at [security@pmmp.io](mailto:security@example.com)

GHSA-mjvm-mhgc-q4gp: Incorrect parsing of EVM reversion exit reason in RPC

### Impact A low severity security issue was discovered affecting parsing of the RPC result of the exit reason in case of EVM reversion. In release build, this would cause the exit reason being incorrectly parsed and returned by RPC. In debug build, this would cause an overflow panic. No action is needed unless you have a bridge node that needs to distinguish different reversion exit reasons and you used RPC for this. ### Patches The issue is patched in https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/pull/820 ### Workarounds None. ### References PR https://github.com/paritytech/frontier/pull/820 ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Email [Wei Tang](mailto:wei@that.world)

GHSA-j3rv-w43q-f9x2: React Editable Json Tree vulnerable to arbitrary code execution via function parsing

### Impact Our library allows strings to be parsed as functions and stored as a specialized component, [`JsonFunctionValue`](https://github.com/oxyno-zeta/react-editable-json-tree/blob/09a0ca97835b0834ad054563e2fddc6f22bc5d8c/src/components/JsonFunctionValue.js). To do this, Javascript's [`eval`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/eval) function was used to execute strings that begin with "function" as Javascript. This was an oversight that unfortunately allows arbitrary code to be executed if it exists as a value within the JSON structure being displayed. Given that this component may often be used to display data from arbitrary, untrusted sources, this is extremely dangerous. One important note is that users who have defined a custom [`onSubmitValueParser`](https://github.com/oxyno-zeta/react-editable-json-tree/tree/09a0ca97835b0834ad054563e2fddc6f22bc5d8c#onsubmitvalueparser) callback prop on the [`JsonTree`](https://github.com/oxyno-ze...

GHSA-4mmh-5vw7-rgvj: Venice vulnerable to Partial Path Traversal issue within the functions `load-file` and `load-resource`

### Impact A partial path traversal issue exists within the functions `load-file` and `load-resource`. These functions can be limited to load files from a list of load paths. Assuming Venice has been configured with the load paths: `[ "/Users/foo/resources" ]` When passing **relative** paths to these two vulnerable functions everything is fine: `(load-resource "test.png")` => loads the file "/Users/foo/resources/test.png" `(load-resource "../resources-alt/test.png")` => rejected, outside the load path When passing **absolute** paths to these two vulnerable functions Venice may return files outside the configured load paths: `(load-resource "/Users/foo/resources/test.png")` => loads the file "/Users/foo/resources/test.png" `(load-resource "/Users/foo/resources-alt/test.png")` => loads the file "/Users/foo/resources-alt/test.png" !!! The latter call suffers from the _Partial Path Traversal_ vulnerability. This issue’s scope is limited to absolute paths whose na...

GHSA-h864-m8vm-3xvj: oqs's Post-Quantum Signature scheme Rainbow level I parametersets broken

Ward Beullens found a practical key-recovery attack against Rainbow. The level I parametersets are removed from liboqs starting from version `0.7.2`. Find the scientific details in [Breaking Rainbow Takes a Weekend on a Laptop](https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/214). This means all the `oqs::sig::Algorithm::RainbowI*` variants are insecure.

GHSA-f92v-grc2-w2fg: Ethermint vulnerable to DoS through unintended Contract Selfdestruct

# Vulnerability Report ## Impact Smart contract applications that make use of the `selfdestruct` functionality and their end-users. ## Classification The vulnerability has been classified as `high` with a CVSS score of `8.2`. It has the potential to create a denial-of-service to all contracts that can invoke the [`selfdestruct`](https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/315/why-are-selfdestructs-used-in-contract-programming#347) function to destroy a smart contract. ## Users Impacted Due to the successfully coordinated security vulnerability disclosure, no smart contracts were impacted through the use of this vulnerability. Smart contract states and storage values are not affected by this vulnerability. User funds and balances are safe. ## Disclosure In Ethermint running versions before `v0.17.2`, the contract `selfdestruct` invocation permanently removes the corresponding bytecode from the internal database storage. However, due to a bug in the [`DeleteAccount`](https://gi...

GHSA-5hm8-vh6r-2cjq: CodeIgniter Shield Vulnerable to SameSite Attackers Bypassing the CSRF Protection

### Impact This vulnerability may allow [SameSite Attackers](https://canitakeyoursubdomain.name/) to bypass the [CodeIgniter4 CSRF protection](https://codeigniter4.github.io/userguide/libraries/security.html) mechanism with CodeIgniter Shield. For this attack to succeed, the attacker must have direct (or indirect, e.g., XSS) control over a subdomain site (e.g., `https://a.example.com/`) of the target site (e.g., `http://example.com/`). This vulnerability exists whether `Config\Security::$csrfProtection` is `'cookie'` or `'session'`. It is also exploitable whether `Config\Security::$regenerate` is `true` or `false`. ### Patches Upgrade to **CodeIgniter v4.2.3 or later** and **Shield v1.0.0-beta.2 or later**. ### Workarounds Do all of the following: - set `Config\Security::$csrfProtection` to `'session'` - remove old session data right after login (immediately after ID and password match) - regenerate CSRF token right after login (immediately after ID and password match) ### Referen...

GHSA-f772-66g8-q5h3: Nodejs ‘undici’ Vulnerable to CRLF Injection via Content-Type

### Impact `=< undici@5.8.0` users are vulnerable to _CRLF Injection_ on headers when using unsanitized input as request headers, more specifically, inside the `content-type` header. Example: ``` import { request } from 'undici' const unsanitizedContentTypeInput = 'application/json\r\n\r\nGET /foo2 HTTP/1.1' await request('http://localhost:3000, { method: 'GET', headers: { 'content-type': unsanitizedContentTypeInput }, }) ``` The above snippet will perform two requests in a single `request` API call: 1) `http://localhost:3000/` 2) `http://localhost:3000/foo2` ### Patches This issue was patched in Undici v5.8.1 ### Workarounds Sanitize input when sending content-type headers using user input. ## For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: - Open an issue in [undici repository](https://github.com/nodejs/undici/issues) - To make a report, follow the [SECURITY](https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/HEAD/SECURITY.md) document...