#auth

View CSAF 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CVSS v4 8.5 ATTENTION: Low attack complexity Vendor: Rockwell Automation Equipment: FactoryTalk Action Manager Vulnerability: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor 2. RISK EVALUATION Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow a local unauthenticated attacker to listen to communications and manipulate the device. 3. TECHNICAL DETAILS 3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS The following versions of FactoryTalk Action Manager, a software management platform, are affected: FactoryTalk Action Manager: Version 1.0.0 to 1.01 3.2 VULNERABILITY OVERVIEW 3.2.1 EXPOSURE OF SENSITIVE INFORMATION TO AN UNAUTHORIZED ACTOR CWE-200 A security issue in the runtime event system allows unauthenticated connections to receive a reusable API token. This token is broadcast over a WebSocket and can be intercepted by any local client listening on the connection. CVE-2025-7532 has been assigned to this vulnerability. A CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 has been calcul...

As of January 10, 2023, CISA will no longer be updating ICS security advisories for Siemens product vulnerabilities beyond the initial advisory. For the most up-to-date information on vulnerabilities in this advisory, please see Siemens' ProductCERT Security Advisories (CERT Services | Services | Siemens Global). View CSAF 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CVSS v4 7.5 ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity Vendor: Siemens Equipment: RUGGEDCOM APE1808 Vulnerabilities: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection'), Execution with Unnecessary Privileges 2. RISK EVALUATION Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an authenticated administrator to execute unauthorized arbitrary OS commands. 3. TECHNICAL DETAILS 3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS Siemens reports that the following products are affected: RUGGEDCOM APE1808: All versions 3.2 VULNERABILITY OVERVIEW 3.2.1 IMPROPER NEUTRALIZATION OF SPECIAL ELEMENTS USED IN AN OS COMMAND ('OS C...

## Summary The `steam-workshop-deploy` github action does not exclude the `.git` directory when packaging content for deployment and provides no built-in way to do so. If a `.git` folder exists in the target directory (e.g., due to a local Git repo, custom project structure, or via the `actions/checkout` workflow), it is silently included in the output package. This results in leakage of sensitive repository metadata and potentially credentials, including github personal access tokens (PATs) embedded in `.git/config`. Many game modding projects require packaging from the project root as the game expects certain files (assets, configuration, metadata) to be present at specific root-level paths. Consequently, the `.git` directory often exists alongside these required files and gets packaged unintentionally, especially when using `actions/checkout`. While github hosted runners automatically revoke ephemeral credentials at the end of each job, the severity of this issue increases dramat...

This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2025-55193 ### Impact The ID passed to `find` or similar methods may be logged without escaping. If this is directly to the terminal it may include unescaped ANSI sequences. ### Releases The fixed releases are available at the normal locations. ### Credits Thanks to [lio346](https://hackerone.com/lio346) for reporting this vulnerability

### Impact An attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to the RAM being exhausted. This requires just reading the file if a series of FlateDecode filters is used on a malicious cross-reference stream. Other content streams are affected on explicit access. ### Patches This has been fixed in [pypdf==6.0.0](https://github.com/py-pdf/pypdf/releases/tag/6.0.0). ### Workarounds If you cannot upgrade yet, you might want to implement the workaround for `pypdf.filters.decompress` yourself: https://github.com/py-pdf/pypdf/blob/0dd57738bbdcdb63f0fb43d8a6b3d222b6946595/pypdf/filters.py#L72-L143 ### References This issue has been reported in #3429 and fixed in #3430.

## Summary A vulnerability was discovered in the External Secrets Operator where the `List()` calls for Kubernetes Secret and SecretStore resources performed by the `PushSecret` controller did not apply a namespace selector. This flaw allowed an attacker to use label selectors to list and read secrets/secret-stores across the cluster, bypassing intended namespace restrictions. --- ## Impact An attacker with the ability to create or update `PushSecret` resources and control `SecretStore` configurations could exploit this vulnerability to exfiltrate sensitive data from arbitrary namespaces. This could lead to full disclosure of Kubernetes secrets, including credentials, tokens, and other sensitive information stored in the cluster. --- ## Exploitability To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must: 1. Have permissions to create or update `PushSecret` resources. 2. Control one or more `SecretStore` resources. With these conditions met, the attacker could leverage label select...

### Background If an error occurred when resetting a user's password using the ``Forgot Password`` option in OMERO.web, the error message displayed on the Web page can disclose information about the user. ### Impact OMERO.web versions before 5.29.1. ### Patches User should upgrade to 5.29.2 or higher. ### Workarounds Disable the ``Forgot password`` option in OMERO.web using the ``omero.web.show_forgot_password`` configuration property[^1]. Open an issue in [omero-web](https://github.com/ome/omero-web) Email us at [security@openmicroscopy.org](mailto:security@openmicroscopy.org) [^1]: https://omero.readthedocs.io/en/stable/sysadmins/config.html#omero.web.show_forgot_password

OS Command Injection in Olivetin 2025.4.22 Custom Themes via the ParseRequestURI function in service/internal/executor/arguments.go.

Kaspersky reports Efimer Trojan infecting thousands, swapping crypto wallets, brute-forcing sites, and spreading through torrents and phishing. Cybercriminals…

In the August 2025 patch Tuesday round Microsoft fixed a total of 111 Microsoft vulnerabilities, some of which are very important.