Microsoft has released its monthly security update for August 2025, which includes 111 vulnerabilities affecting a range of products, including 13 that Microsoft marked as “critical”.  
In this month's release, Microsoft observed none of the included vulnerabilities being actively exploited in the wild. Out

Tuesday, August 12, 2025 15:39

Microsoft has released its monthly security update for August 2025, which includes 111 vulnerabilities affecting a range of products, including 13 that Microsoft marked as “critical”.  

In this month's release, Microsoft observed none of the included vulnerabilities being actively exploited in the wild. Out of 13 "critical" entries, 9 are remote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities in Microsoft Windows services and applications including the Windows kernel, Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ), Windows Hyper-V, Microsoft Office and GDI+.  

CVE-2025-50176 is an RCE vulnerability in DirectX Graphics Kernel given a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8, where access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Graphics Kernel allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally. Microsoft has noted that this vulnerability affects different versions of Windows 11, Windows Server 2022 and Windows Server 2025. Microsoft assessed that the attack complexity is “low”, and that exploitation is "more likely". 

CVE-2025-50177 is an RCE vulnerability in Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) service, given a CVSS score of 8.1, where use after free vulnerability allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to send a series of specially crafted MSMQ packets in a rapid sequence over HTTP to a MSMQ server. Microsoft assessed that the attack complexity is “high”, and that exploitation is “more likely”.  

CVE-2025-53778 is a Windows NTLM elevation of privilege vulnerability given a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8, where improper authentication in Windows NTLM allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network, with an attacker successfully exploiting this vulnerability gaining SYSTEM privileges. Microsoft has noted that this vulnerability affects different versions of Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2026, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2022 and Windows Server 2025. Microsoft assessed that the attack complexity is “low”, and that exploitation is “more likely”. 

CVE-2025-53781 is an information disclosure vulnerability in Windows Hyper-V given a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.7, where an authorized attacker may be able to disclose sensitive information over a network. Microsoft has noted that this vulnerability affects Windows Server 2025 with the attack complexity assessed as “low” and that exploitation as “less likely”.  

CVE-2025-53733 is a remote code execution vulnerability in Microsoft Word given a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.4 where an incorrect conversion between numeric types in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. Microsoft has noted that this vulnerability affects Word 2016, Microsoft SharePoint Server 2019, Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016, Microsoft Office LTSC 2024, Microsoft Office LTSC 2021, Microsoft Office LTSC 2019 and Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise. Microsoft assessed that the attack complexity is “low”, and that exploitation is “less likely”. 

CVE-2025-53740 is a remote code execution vulnerability in Microsoft Office, given a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.4 where a use after free condition allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally using a Preview Pane as the attack vector. Microsoft has noted that this vulnerability affects Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2024, Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2021, Microsoft Office LTSC 2024, Microsoft Office LTSC 2021, Microsoft Office LTSC 2019, Microsoft Office LTSC 2016 and Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise. Microsoft assessed that the attack complexity is “low”, and that exploitation is “less likely”. 

CVE-2025-53766 is a remote code execution vulnerability in GDI+, a graphics Windows subsystem providing a set of features for rendering 2D graphics, images, and text, given a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 where a heap-based buffer overflow allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. An attacker could trigger this vulnerability by convincing a victim to download and open a document that contains a specially crafted metafile. Microsoft has noted that this vulnerability affects various versions of Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server 2008. Microsoft assessed that the attack complexity is “low”, and that exploitation is “less likely”. 

CVE-2025-50165 is another remote code execution vulnerability in the Windows graphics component. It was also given a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 where an untrusted pointer dereference allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network without any user intervention. An attacker can use an uninitialized function pointer being called when decoding a JPEG image. This can be embedded in Office and 3rd party documents/files. This vulnerability affects Windows 11 24H2 and Windows Server 2025. Microsoft assessed that the attack complexity is “low”, and that exploitation is “less likely”.

CVE-2025-49707 is a spoofing vulnerability in Windows Hyper-V hypervisor affecting Azure, given a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.9, where improper access control may allow an attacker to perform spoofing locally. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker could obtain a valid certificate after a system reboot, which could then be used to access sensitive information, bypassing security measures and allow an attacker with access to a confidential VM to impersonate its identity in communications with external systems. Microsoft has noted that this vulnerability affects NCCadsH100v5-series, ECesv5-series, ECedsv5-series, ECasv5-series, ECadsv5-series, DCesv5-series, DCedsv5-series, DCasv5-series and DCadsv5-series of Azure VM. Microsoft assessed that the attack complexity is “low”, and that exploitation is “less likely”. 

CVE-2025-48807 is a remote code execution vulnerability in Windows Hyper-V hypervisor, given a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5, where improper restriction of communication channels to intended endpoints may result in an attacker executing code locally in a nested guest VM to escape their VM and gain admin privileges on the guest VM that is serving as the host. Microsoft has noted that this vulnerability affects various versions of Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server VM. Microsoft assessed that the attack complexity is “high”, and that exploitation is “less likely”. 

CVE-2025-53731 is a remote code execution vulnerability in Microsoft Office, given a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.4, where exploiting a use after free vulnerability may allow an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally, with the Preview Pane as an attack vector. Microsoft has noted that this vulnerability affects Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2024, Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2021, Microsoft Office LTSC 2024, Microsoft Office LTSC 2021, Microsoft Office 2019, Microsoft Office 2016 and Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise. Microsoft assessed that the attack complexity is “low”, and that exploitation is “unlikely”. 

CVE-2025-53784 is a remote code execution vulnerability affecting Microsoft Word, given a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.4, where exploiting a use after free vulnerability may allow an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally, with the Preview Pane as an attack vector. Microsoft has noted that this vulnerability affects Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2024, Microsoft Office LTSC for Mac 2021, Microsoft Office LTSC 2024, Microsoft Office LTSC 2021 and Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise. Microsoft assessed that the attack complexity is “low”, and that exploitation is “unlikely”. 

CVE-2025-53793 is an information disclosure vulnerability in Microsoft Azure Stack Hub, which may allow an attacker to disclose system internal configuration information over the network. It was given a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 and affects Azure Stack Hub 2501, Azure Stack Hub 2406 and Azure Stack Hub 2408. Microsoft assessed that the attack complexity is “low”, and that exploitation is “unlikely”. 

Aside from the vulnerabilities patched and disclosed in the regular monthly patch release for August, it is worth noting that one week ahead of the monthly update, Microsoft disclosed 4 vulnerabilities affecting Microsoft cloud services, CVE-2025-53767, CVE-2025-53774, CVE-2025-53787 and CVE-2025-53792. While the CVSS base score for some of them is high, Microsoft has noted that no customer actions are required to resolve the issues.  

Talos would also like to highlight the following "important" vulnerabilities as Microsoft has determined that their exploitation is "more likely:"   

CVE-2025-53786: Microsoft Exchange Server Hybrid Deployment Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 

CVE-2025-49743: Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability,  

CVE-2025-50167: Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 

CVE-2025-50168: Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 

CVE-2025-53132: Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 

CVE-2025-53147: Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 

CVE-2025-53156: Windows Storage Port Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability 

CVE-2025-49712: Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability 

A complete list of all the other vulnerabilities Microsoft disclosed this month is available on its update page.    

In response to these vulnerability disclosures, Talos is releasing a new Snort ruleset that detects attempts to exploit some of them. Please note that additional rules may be released at a future date, and current rules are subject to change pending additional information. Cisco Security Firewall customers should use the latest update to their ruleset by updating their SRU. Open-source Snort Subscriber Ruleset customers can stay up to date by downloading the latest rule pack available for purchase on Snort.org.    

 Snort 2 rules included in this release that protect against the exploitation of many of these vulnerabilities are: 65234- 65237, 65240-65247.  

The following Snort 3 rules are also available: 301300, 301301, 30304-30306, 65240, 65241.

Microsoft Patch Tuesday for August 2025 — Snort rules and prominent vulnerabilities

Plus: Instagram sparks a privacy backlash over its new map feature, hackers steal data from Google's customer support system, and the true scope of the Columbia University hack comes into focus.

This is the week of Black Hat and Defcon, which means a flood of news coming out of the Las Vegas security conferences. As you might expect, artificial intelligence was one popular topic—specifically, using AI chatbots to cause mischief.

One team of researchers, from Tel Aviv University, created a clever attack that allowed them to take over a target’s smart home devices using a “poisoned” Google Calendar invite. It’s the first known attack method that used AI to impact physical devices.

Another researcher used a poisoned document that included a malicious prompt to trick ChatGPT into leaking a user’s private information when it’s connected to a Google Drive.

In non-AI news, an end-to-end encryption algorithm recommended for radio communications used by police and military around the world can be easily cracked, according to new research. The researchers warn that weak implementations of the encryption algorithm could allow eavesdroppers to listen in—or even transmit their own messages.

Speaking of weaknesses, a security researcher found that misconfigured APIs in some streaming platforms used for company meetings and sports livestreams can allow someone to watch the streams without logging in. And a teen hacker discovered that an internet-connected smoke and vape detector in his high school’s bathroom contained microphones—and can be exploited for secret spying.

A leaked trove of data has exposed how teams of suspected North Korean IT scam workers operate, from their meticulous record keeping to the after-work activities—and their near-constant surveillance by people running the schemes.

Finally, in the last of our Black Hat- and Defcon-related news (so far), a pair of security researchers discovered a backdoor in an electronic lock used in at least eight brands of safes, and created a way to open the locks in seconds. They also found another vulnerability that allows them to figure out a safe’s unlock code.

We also took a deep dive into the US military’s slot machine program, spoke with experts who say it’s inevitable that AI will become part of nuclear weapons systems, and revealed a string of break-ins of National Guard armories in Tennessee that experts say is part of a disturbing trend.

And that’s not all. Each week, we round up the security and privacy news we didn’t cover in-depth ourselves. Click the headlines to read the full stories. And stay safe out there.

**Hack of US Court System Exposed Sealed Records, FBI Says**

A previously unreported cyberattack breached the federal judiciary’s electronic case filing system, potentially exposing the identities of confidential informants and compromising sealed court records across multiple US states, Politico reports. The breach was discovered around July 4 and affects the CM/ECF—or “case management/electronic case files”—system used by courts to manage sensitive documents.

Sources told Politico the hack may have impacted criminal dockets, arrest warrants, and sealed indictments, raising concerns that cooperating witnesses could be at risk. The actor behind the intrusion has not been exposed. The Administrative Office of the US Courts and FBI declined to provide Politico with a comment.

In response to recent cyberattacks, the federal judiciary said its been in the process of implementing new safeguards to address the judiciary’s ongoing exposure to “constant and sophisticated” cyber threats.

The incident highlights longstanding warnings that the judiciary’s systems are outdated and vulnerable. A top federal judge told Congress in June that CM/ECF and PACER face “unrelenting security threats” and need urgent replacement.

**Instagram’s New Map Feature Triggers Privacy Backlash**

Instagram’s latest feature—a searchable map showing user-posted content tagged to specific locations—has sparked a wave of privacy concerns, CNBC reports. Rolled out this week, the feature lets users explore photos and videos by browsing a visual map interface.

But users quickly raised alarms about the potential for stalking, harassment, and data misuse, especially for influencers and others posting real-time content from identifiable locations. “Instagram randomly updating their app to include a maps feature without actually alerting people is so incredibly dangerous to anyone who has a restraining order and actively making sure their abuser can’t stalk their location online,” one viral post warned.

Instagram said the feature only shows content from public accounts and reiterated that users can turn off location tagging. Still, the backlash echoes broader concerns about how tech platforms rapidly aggregate and expose personal data in ways that outpace users’ expectations and consent.

**Hackers Breached Google’s Salesforce Database, Stole Customer Data**

Hackers stole data from Google’s customer support system in a breach linked to a compromised Salesforce account, TechCrunch reports. The intrusion, disclosed Wednesday, affected an undisclosed number of Google customers and involved unauthorized access to data such as contact details and “related notes for small and medium-sized businesses.”

The attackers reportedly targeted the data through Salesforce cloud systems. Google’s Threat Intelligence Group pinned the attack on ShinyHunters, a hacking group known for targeting large companies’ cloud-based databases, including Salesforce systems.

The breach affecting Google follows similar attacks on Cisco, Qantas, and Pandora, where attackers used voice phishing to trick employees into granting access. Google says the group may be preparing a leak site to extort victims and is linked to other cybercriminal collectives like The Com, which has a history of hacking and extortion.

**Columbia University Hack Exposed Data of 870,000 People**

A cyberattack on Columbia University compromised the personal information of nearly 870,000 individuals, including students, applicants, and possibly staff, Bloomberg reports. The stolen data includes contact information, academic records, financial aid details, and some health and insurance information, according to draft letters, intended for victims, obtained by the news outlet.

The breach, which dates back to mid-May, was only publicly acknowledged after Columbia filed reports with state attorneys general in California and Maine. A university official previously claimed the perpetrator was politically motivated. The school claims it has implemented new safeguards and continues to notify affected individuals.

The incident preceded a campus-wide IT outage in June. The school reportedly suspected a potential cyberattack at the time.

The US Court Records System Has Been Hacked

Can AI really write safer code? Martin dusts off his software engineer skills to put it it to the test. Find out what AI code failed at, and what it was surprisingly good at. Also, we discuss new research on how AI LLM models can be used to assist in the reverse engineering of malware.

Thursday, August 7, 2025 14:00

Welcome to this week’s edition of the Threat Source newsletter. 

Vulnerabilities within software are a persistent challenge. Software engineers inadvertently tend to make the same mistakes repeatedly, with the same entries appearing in the annual top 25 list of Common Weakness Enumerations each year. 

The truth is, writing software is difficult. Software engineering is a craft demands concentration, knowledge and time, all coupled with extensive testing. Even the most skilled software engineer can get distracted or have a bad day, leading to a hidden vulnerability inadvertently making its way into a production codebase. 

Identifying vulnerabilities early in the software development process is one of the promises of AI. The idea being that an AI agent would write perfect code under the direction of a software engineer or verify and correct code written by a human. 

Last weekend, I decided to put this premise to the test. As a somewhat rusty software engineer, I resolved to see if AI could assist me with a personal software project. Initially, I was impressed, the AI agent offered an engaging discussion about high-level architecture and the trade-offs of various approaches. I was amazed at the lines of code that the AI generated on request. All the software for my project written at the press of a button! 

Then came the testing. Although the code looked convincing, it failed to interface with the required libraries. Parameters were incorrect, it tried to call fictional functions. It seemed that the way the AI imagined the library to work didn’t reflect reality or the available documentation. Similarly, there were less sanity checks or verification of variable values than I was comfortable with; especially since many of these were derived from external inputs. 

To be fair, the AI code resolved a tricky threading issue that had defeated me, and the ‘boilerplate’ code necessary to form the skeleton structure of the software was flawless. I felt that I achieved a productivity boost from the AI’s exposure to ‘frequently encountered’ coding issues. However, when it came to more esoteric APIs with which I was moderately familiar, the AI was unable to generate functional code or correctly diagnose reported errors. 

After some debugging and manual rewriting, I managed to create a working prototype. The code is clearly not bulletproof, but then again, I hadn’t explicitly asked for code that was secured against all potential hacks. Like many software engineers, myself and my AI assistant focused on quickly delivering the desired functionality, rather than considering the long-term operation of the code in a potentially hostile environment. 

I remain optimistic that AI assisted coding is the pathway to a software vulnerability free future. However, my recent limited personal experience leads me to think that we still have a considerable journey ahead before we can definitively resolve software vulnerabilities for good. 

I hope you all have a tremendous time at Summer Camp, see a lot of old friends and make new ones and most importantly that you shower and use deodorant. Conference season is a marathon, it’s long, it’s arduous, it’s sweaty – be the hygienic change you want to see in the world.  

**The one big thing **

Continuing the AI theme, Guilherme describes how AI LLM models can be used to assist in the reverse engineering of malware. Used correctly, LLMs can provide valuable insights and facilitate the analysis of malware. 

**Why do I care? **

Reverse engineering malware is the often time-consuming task of identifying the execution path of malicious software. Frequently malware writers obfuscate their code to make it difficult to understand and follow what their code is doing. Advances in technology that can speed up this process make fighting malware easier.  

**So now what? **

Investigate if the tools and approaches described in the blog can be used to improve your reverse engineering process, or as a means to begin learning about reverse engineering. 

**Top security headlines of the week ****As ransomware gangs threaten physical harm, 'I am afraid of what's next,' ex-negotiator says**

In an effort to increase the pressure on victims, ransomware gangs are now using threats of physical violence. (The Register)

**‘Shadow AI’ increases cost of data breaches, report finds**

Unmanaged and unsecured use of AI is leading to data breaches. (Cybersecurity Dive)

****Enough to drive a cybersecurity officer mad: one rule here, a different rule there****

Chief information security officers call for less fragmentation in global cybersecurity regulations. (ASPI)

****UK Online Safety Act promotes insecurity****

The implementation of the UK Online Safety Act requiring age verification for content deemed harmful to children introduces some security quandaries. (Tech HQ)

**Can’t get enough Talos? ****Cyber Analyst Series: Cybersecurity Overview and the Role of the Cybersecurity Analyst**

A series of videos on the profession of cybersecurity analysts made in conjunction with the Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine for Diia.Education (available in English and Ukrainian languages). **Watch here.**

**Tales from the Frontlines**

Join the Cisco Talos Incident Response team to hear real-world stories from the frontlines of cyber defense. **Reserve your spot.**

**Vulnerability roundup**

Cisco Talos’ Vulnerability Discovery & Research team recently disclosed seven vulnerabilities in WWBN AVideo, four in MedDream, and one in an Eclipse ThreadX module. **Read more.**

**Talos Takes**

Hazel is joined by threat intelligence researcher James Nutland to discuss Cisco Talos’ latest findings on the newly emerged Chaos ransomware group. **Listen here.**

**Upcoming events where you can find Talos **

It’s the summer. We’ll be on the beach. 

**Most prevalent malware files from Talos telemetry over the past week  **

**SHA 256: 9f1f11a708d393e0a4109ae189bc64f1f3e312653dcf317a2bd406f18ffcc507**   
MD5: 2915b3f8b703eb744fc54c81f4a9c67f   
VirusTotal: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/9f1f11a708d393e0a4109ae189bc64f1f3e312653dcf317a2bd406f18ffcc507   
Typical Filename: VID001.exe   
Claimed Product: N/A   
Detection Name: Win.Worm.Coinminer::1201  

**SHA 256: a31f222fc283227f5e7988d1ad9c0aecd66d58bb7b4d8518ae23e110308dbf91**      
MD5: 7bdbd180c081fa63ca94f9c22c457376    
VirusTotal: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/a31f222fc283227f5e7988d1ad9c0aecd66d58bb7b4d8518ae23e110308dbf91/details    
Typical Filename: IMG001.exe     
Detection Name: Simple\_Custom\_Detection 

**SHA 256: 41f14d86bcaf8e949160ee2731802523e0c76fea87adf00ee7fe9567c3cec610**   
MD5: 85bbddc502f7b10871621fd460243fbc    
VirusTotal: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/41f14d86bcaf8e949160ee2731802523e0c76fea87adf00ee7fe9567c3cec610/details   
Typical Filename: N/A   
Claimed Product: Self-extracting archive   
Detection Name: Win.Worm.Bitmin-9847045-0 

**SHA256: 47ecaab5cd6b26fe18d9759a9392bce81ba379817c53a3a468fe9060a076f8ca**    
MD5: 71fea034b422e4a17ebb06022532fdde     
VirusTotal: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/47ecaab5cd6b26fe18d9759a9392bce81ba379817c53a3a468fe9060a076f8ca/details    
Typical Filename: VID001.exe     
Claimed Product: N/A     
Detection Name: Coinminer:MBT.26mw.in14.Talos  

**SHA 256: 59f1e69b68de4839c65b6e6d39ac7a272e2611ec1ed1bf73a4f455e2ca20eeaa**    
MD5: df11b3105df8d7c70e7b501e210e3cc3    
VirusTotal: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/59f1e69b68de4839c65b6e6d39ac7a272e2611ec1ed1bf73a4f455e2ca20eeaa/details    
Typical Filename: DOC001.exe    
Claimed Product: N/A    
Detection Name: Win.Worm.Coinminer::1201

AI wrote my code and all I got was this broken prototype

In 2024, it was Snowflake. In 2025, it's Salesforce. ShinyHunters is back, with low-tech hacks that nonetheless manage to bring down international megaliths like Google, Cisco, and Adidas.

Payback: 'ShinyHunters' Clocks Google via Salesforce

GuidePoint Security uncovers a new Akira ransomware tactic targeting SonicWall VPNs. The group's use of drivers to disable defenses is a significant threat to businesses.

A new report by cybersecurity firm GuidePoint Security reveals a clever new method used by the Akira ransomware group to attack computer networks. Researchers found that following initial access into systems, the hackers have been using two specific software drivers to secretly disable security tools, a key step before deploying their ransomware.

The discovery by GuidePoint Security, shared with Hackread.com, is considered a high-priority finding because it has been observed repeatedly in recent attacks by Akira, which has been exploiting security flaws in SonicWall VPNs since late July. This new insight gives companies a better chance to find and stop these attacks before they can cause major damage. The hacking group’s activity has been traced back to at least July 15, 2025.

****How Hackers Are Sneaking Past Defences****

The report explains how hackers gain entry by exploiting vulnerabilities in SonicWall VPNs. Once inside, they use two drivers, which are small software programs that help a computer’s hardware and software communicate.

One of the drivers, named rwdrv.sys, is actually a legitimate file from a performance tool for Intel CPUs, but hackers are misusing it to gain powerful, kernel-level access to the affected device. This gives them deep control over the computer’s operations.

The second driver, hlpdrv.sys, is malicious. Its job is to specifically target and disable Windows Defender, the built-in antivirus software. By using these two drivers in a specific order, the attackers can effectively blind a system’s security software, clearing the way to launch their ransomware.

****A History of Attacks on Businesses****

This new campaign is not Akira’s first time targeting corporate networks through security vulnerabilities. In August 2023, the group was identified as exploiting weaknesses in Cisco VPN products to gain unauthorised access and launch ransomware attacks.

More recently, in April 2025, Hackread.com also covered a new spam campaign from an AkiraBot, a tool that uses AI to create personalised spam messages for small businesses. These past campaigns show that Akira is a persistent and adaptable threat to a wide range of industries, from education and healthcare to manufacturing.

****What Companies Should Do****

GuidePoint Security is strongly advising security professionals to actively search for these two drivers on their systems. They have also provided a special rule, called a YARA rule, to help with this effort. It’s a tool that helps security teams scan their systems to find the unique patterns of these malicious drivers, allowing for quick detection.

Separately, SonicWall has issued its own advice for customers, recommending using multi-factor authentication (MFA) to make logging in more secure, limiting who can connect to the VPN, and making sure all security services are turned on.

Akira Ransomware Hits SonicWall VPNs, Deploys Drivers to Bypass Security

Cisco Talos’ Vulnerability Discovery & Research team recently disclosed seven vulnerabilities in WWBN AVideo, four in MedDream, and one in an Eclipse ThreadX module.
The vulnerabilities mentioned in this blog post have been patched by their respective vendors, all in adherence to Cisco’s third-party vulnerability disclosure policy

Wednesday, August 6, 2025 08:00

Cisco Talos’ Vulnerability Discovery & Research team recently disclosed seven vulnerabilities in WWBN AVideo, four in MedDream, and one in an Eclipse ThreadX module.

The vulnerabilities mentioned in this blog post have been patched by their respective vendors, all in adherence to Cisco’s third-party vulnerability disclosure policy.    

For Snort coverage that can detect the exploitation of these vulnerabilities, download the latest rule sets from Snort.org, and our latest Vulnerability Advisories are always posted on Talos Intelligence’s website.     

****WWBN XSS, race condition, incomplete blacklist vulnerabilities****

_Discovered by Claudio Bozzato of Cisco Talos._

WWBN AVideo is a video streaming platform with hosting, management, and video monetization features.

Talos found five cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in WWBN AVideo 14.4 and dev master commit 8a8954ff:

*   TALOS-2025-2205 (CVE-2025-46410)
*   TALOS-2025-2206 (CVE-2025-53084)
*   TALOS-2025-2207 (CVE-2025-50128)
*   TALOS-2025-2208 (CVE-2025-36548)
*   TALOS-2025-2209 (CVE-2025-41420)

A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary Javascript execution in all five cases. An attacker must get a user to visit a webpage to trigger these vulnerabilities.

Additionally, Talos identified two vulnerabilities that, when chained together, can lead to arbitrary code execution:

TALOS-2025-2212 (CVE-2025-25214) A race condition vulnerability exists in the aVideoEncoder.json.php unzip functionality of WWBN AVideo 14.4 and dev master commit 8a8954ff. A series of specially crafted HTTP requests can lead to arbitrary code execution.

TALOS-2025-2213 (CVE-2025-48732) An incomplete blacklist exists in the .htaccess sample of WWBN AVideo 14.4 and dev master commit 8a8954ff. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can request a .phar file to trigger this vulnerability.

****MedDream****

_Discovered by Emmanuel Tacheau and Marcin Noga of Cisco Talos._

MedDream PACS Premium is a DICOM 3.0 compliant picture archiving and communication system for the medical industry. The PACS server provides connectivity to all DICOM modalities (CR, DX, CT, MR, US, XA, etc.).

Talos found four unique MedDreams PACS Premium vulnerabilities.

TALOS-2025-2154 (CVE-2025-26469) is an incorrect default permissions vulnerability in the CServerSettings::SetRegistryValues functionality of MedDream PACS Premium 7.3.3.840. A specially crafted application can decrypt credentials stored in a configuration-related registry key. An attacker can execute a malicious script or application to exploit this vulnerability.

TALOS-2025-2156 (CVE-2025-27724) is a privilege escalation vulnerability in the login.php functionality of meddream MedDream PACS Premium 7.3.3.840. A specially crafted .php file can lead to elevated capabilities. An attacker can upload a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.

TALOS-2025-2176 (CVE-2025-32731) is a reflected XSS vulnerability in the radiationDoseReport.php functionality of meddream MedDream PACS Premium 7.3.5.860. A specially crafted malicious URL can lead to arbitrary JavaScript code execution. An attacker can provide a crafted URL to trigger this vulnerability.

TALOS-2025-2177 (CVE-2025-24485) is a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the cecho.php functionality of MedDream PACS Premium 7.3.5.860. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to SSRF. An attacker can make an unauthenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.

****Eclipse ThreadX FileX integer underflow vulnerability****

_Discovered by Kelly Patterson of Cisco Talos._

Eclipse ThreadX is an embedded development suite for an advanced real-time operating system (RTOS) that provides efficient performance for resource-constrained devices. 

TALOS-2024-2088 is a buffer overflow vulnerability in the FileX RAM disk driver functionality of Eclipse ThreadX FileX git commit 1b85eb2. A specially crafted set of network packets can lead to code execution. An attacker can send a sequence of requests to trigger this vulnerability.

WWBN, MedDream, Eclipse vulnerabilities

The networking giant said this week that an employee suffered a voice phishing attack that resulted in the compromise of select user data, including email addresses and phone numbers.

Cisco User Data Stolen in Vishing Attack

A new Cisco Talos report reveals critical flaws in Dell Latitude and Precision laptops. Find out how hackers can exploit the ControlVault chip to steal sensitive data.

Cybersecurity giant Cisco has found serious security vulnerabilities in more than 100 Dell laptop models, putting tens of millions of devices at risk worldwide. This was revealed in a report shared by Cisco with Hackread.com, warning that the flaws could let attackers take full control of a device, steal passwords and access sensitive data, including fingerprint information.

The vulnerabilities, which Cisco’s Talos team has named ReVault, affect a hardware component called Dell ControlVault. Five vulnerabilities were found in this hardware, which have been assigned the following CVEs:

*   CVE-2025-24311
*   CVE-2025-25050
*   CVE-2025-25215
*   CVE-2025-24922
*   CVE-2025-24919

For your information, Dell ControlVault is a security chip designed to securely store passwords and biometric data. However, the flaws could allow attackers to bypass Windows login, gain persistent access to a device, or even tamper with the device to accept any fingerprint.

This could be especially troubling for government and business users, considering that these vulnerabilities are found in many business-focused models, including Dell’s Latitude and Precision series, which are common in government and corporate settings.

The report details two main ways attackers could take advantage of these flaws. The first is a way to gain permanent access to a laptop. Even if a user completely reinstalls their operating system, a malicious program could hide in the ControlVault chip itself, making it a persistent threat.

The second is a physical attack. A person with access to the laptop could open it up and directly tamper with the chip, giving them the ability to bypass the login screen or even fool the fingerprint reader into accepting any fingerprint.

Cisco Talos recommends that all affected Dell laptop owners install the latest firmware updates immediately and consider disabling the ControlVault services if they don’t use features like the fingerprint or smart card reader.

In a separate announcement, Cisco has also teamed up with Hugging Face, a major hub for AI models, to address the growing risk of malware and vulnerabilities within the AI supply chain, which includes millions of models available to developers.

As part of the partnership, a special version of Cisco’s malware scanner, ClamAV, will now automatically scan every public file uploaded to the Hugging Face platform. Cisco notes that this new anti-malware capability for AI models is being made available to the public for free. These findings highlight a broader message from Cisco about the importance of security at every level, from a laptop’s hardware to the digital files powering AI.

Over 100 Dell Laptop Models Plagued by Vulnerabilities Impacting Millions

Talos reported 5 vulnerabilities to Broadcom and Dell affecting both the ControlVault3 Firmware and its associated Windows APIs that we are calling “ReVault”.

Tuesday, August 5, 2025 09:00

*   Talos reported 5 vulnerabilities to Broadcom and Dell affecting both the ControlVault3 Firmware and its associated Windows APIs that we are calling “ReVault”. 
*   100+ models of Dell Laptops are affected by this vulnerability if left unpatched. 
*   The ReVault attack can be used as a post-compromise persistence technique that can remain even across Windows reinstalls.  
*   The ReVault attack can also be used as a physical compromise to bypass Windows Login and/or for any local user to gain Admin/System privileges. 

**Dell ControlVault overview **

Dell ControlVault is “a hardware-based security solution that provides a secure bank that stores your passwords, biometric templates, and security codes within the firmware.” A daughter board provides this functionality and performs these security features in firmware. Dell refers to the daughter board as a Unified Security Hub (USH), as it is used as a hub to run ControlVault (CV), connecting various security peripherals such as a fingerprint reader, smart card reader and NFC reader. 

Here is a photographic example of a USH board:  ​​​​

Picture of a USH Board running CV. 

This is the board in its natural environment:  

USH board (highlighted in orange) inside a Dell Latitude laptop. 

The current iterations of the product are called ControlVault3 and ControlVault3+. and can be found in more than 100 different models of actively-supported Dell laptops (see DSA-2025-053), mostly from the business-centric Lattitude and Precision series. These laptop models are widely used in the cybersecurity industry, government settings and challenging environments in their Rugged version. Sensitive industries that require heightened security when logging in (via smartcard or NFC) are more likely to find ControlVault devices in their environment, as they are necessary to enable these security features. 

**Findings **

Today, Talos is publishing five CVEs and their associated reports. The vulnerabilities include multiple out-of-bounds vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-24311, CVE-2025-25050) an arbitrary free (CVE-2025-25215) and a stack-overflow (CVE-2025-24922), all affecting the CV firmware. We also reported an unsafe-deserialization (CVE-2025-24919) that affects ControlVault’s Windows APIs. 

**Impact **

With a lack of common security mitigations and the combination of some of the vulnerabilities mentioned above, the impact of these findings is significant. Let’s highlight two of the most critical attack scenarios we have uncovered. 

**Post-compromise pivot **

On the Windows side, a non-administrative user can interact with the CV  firmware using its associated APIs and trigger an Arbitrary Code Execution on the CV firmware. From this vantage point, it becomes possible to leak key material essential to the security of the device, thus gaining the ability to permanently modify its firmware. This creates the risk of a so-called implant that could stay unnoticed in a laptop’s CV firmware and eventually be used as a pivot back onto the system in the case of a Threat Actor’s post-compromise strategy. The following video shows how a tampered CV firmware can be used to “hack Windows” by leveraging the unsafe deserialization bug mentioned previously. 

0:00

/0:22

**Physical attack **

A local attacker with physical access to a user’s laptop can pry it open and directly access the USH board over USB with a custom connector. From there, all the vulnerabilities described previously become in-scope for the attacker without requiring the ability to log-in into the system or knowing a full-disk encryption password. While chassis-intrusion can be detected, this is a feature that needs to be enabled beforehand to be effective at warning of a potential tampering. 

Another interesting consequence of this scenario is that if a system is configured to be unlocked with the user’s fingerprint, it is also possible to tamper with the CV firmware to accept any fingerprint rather than only allowing a legitimate user’s.   

0:00

/0:07

**Mitigation **

To mitigate these attacks, Talos recommends the following: 

*   Keep your system up to date to ensure the latest firmware is installed. CV firmware can be automatically deployed via Windows Update, but new firmware usually gets released on the Dell website a few weeks prior. 
*   If not using any of the security peripherals (fingerprint reader, smart card reader and NFC reader) it is possible to disable the CV services (using the Service Manager) and/or the CV device (via the Device Manager).  
*   It is also worth considering disabling fingerprint login when risks are heightened (e.g., leaving one’s laptop unattended in a hotel room). Windows also provides Enhanced Sign-in Security (ESS), which may help mitigate some of the physical attacks and detect inappropriate CV firmware. 

**Detection **

To detect an attack, consider the following: 

*   Depending on your laptop model, chassis intrusion detection can be enabled in the computer’s BIOS. This would flag physical tampering and may require entering a password to clear the alert and restart the computer. 
*   In the Windows logs, unexpected crashes of the Windows Biometric Service or the various Credential Vault services could be a sign of compromise. 
*   Cisco customers using Cisco Secure Endpoint can be made aware of potential risks with the signature definition “bcmbipdll.dll Loaded by Abnormal Process”. 

**Conclusion **

These findings highlight the importance of evaluating the security posture of all hardware components within your devices, not just the operating system or software. As Talos demonstrated, vulnerabilities in widely-used firmware such as Dell ControlVault can have far-reaching implications, potentially compromising even advanced security features like biometric authentication. Staying vigilant, patching your systems and proactively assessing risk are essential to safeguard your systems against evolving threats.

ReVault! When your SoC turns against you…

In 2023, Cisco Talos and partners created a special Backdoors & Breaches card deck to help NGOs improve their cybersecurity skills with practical, easy-to-use training tailored to their needs.

Monday, August 4, 2025 12:00

*   In 2023, Talos collaborated with NetHope and Cisco Crisis Response to create a customized Backdoors & Breaches expansion deck for international humanitarian organizations, addressing their unique cybersecurity challenges. 
*   The new expansion deck helps NGOs with constrained budgets improve proactive security and incident response skills through engaging tabletop exercises that are specific to their technical, political, and logistical challenges. 
*   Hundreds of expansion decks have been distributed to international NGOs, and Talos has received positive feedback for their practicality and relevance. 
*   Building on this success, we partnered with NGO-ISAC to develop a United States-specific deck for domestic NGOs, enhancing their cybersecurity preparedness.

**Humanitarian organizations and the cybersecurity landscape**

Hello friends! My name is Joe Marshall and I work at Cisco Talos as a cyber threat researcher and security strategist. Throughout my travels with Talos, I’ve met extraordinary individuals and organizations who fight injustices in a variety of ways: caring for children, feeding the unhoused, promoting democracy, protecting the environment, or resettling refugees who are fleeing from war. 

In moments of unimaginable crisis and pain, the international non-governmental organization (NGO) folks I met are on the front lines distributing aid, documenting human rights abuses, assisting first responders, and offering comfort to people who have had their worlds upended. I unabashedly admire and respect them. 

Unfortunately, international NGOs have historically struggled in cybersecurity. No matter an NGO’s size, limited donor and grant dollars mean that sustaining the organization competes with delivering aid, leaving little (if any) funding for cybersecurity. As a result, public sector offensive actors, mercenary spyware organizations, and state-sponsored actors take advantage of this to target or financially exploit these NGOs, even though they are assisting some of the most vulnerable people in the world. No one gets a pass in this modern era of cybercrime!

**Helping the helpers**

In 2023, the Cisco Crisis Response (CCR) team — a group that helps local agencies and communities prepare for, respond to, and sustainably rebuild from crises — approached my team at Talos with a rare opportunity to help incorporate cybersecurity into their work alongside their partner, NetHope.

NetHope is a humanitarian assistance organization that “helps our nonprofit Members effectively address the world’s most pressing challenges through collaboration, collective action and the smarter use of technology.” They also host the NetHope Global Summit, a yearly gathering of international NGOs to discuss technical issues and solutions to enable their member NGOs’ missions.

Before this project, I was not well-versed in the challenges of the NGO cybersecurity landscape or operating realities. Every business vertical is unique, and my first few meetings with NetHope forced me to confront the stark realities of the cybersecurity poverty line. With NGOs’ limited cybersecurity budgets, expertise, and resources, I knew our project had to have a low barrier to entry.

After much brainstorming, I suggested that we create an NGO-centric version of the popular cybersecurity tabletop exercise, “Backdoors & Breaches,” to keep workers’ incident response skills sharp.

**What is a tabletop exercise? **

A tabletop exercise (TTX) is a group thought experiment. The “Game Master” presents various scenarios and variables to their players, who are usually team leaders in their business, to see how they respond as a group. At a high level, TTXs are a way to help your team prepare for worst-case scenarios and cost-effectively develop plans and responses to a variety of incidents. As they say, “Fortune favors the prepared.”

For example, a hospital might want to conduct a TTX to develop and test incident response and data recovery if hackers were to attack their electronic health records. An electric utility company might conduct a TTX to test critical infrastructure restoration and coordination with emergency responders. And, of course, a humanitarian assistance organization may need to protect itself against cyber attacks to keep their life-saving work going!

**An introduction to Backdoors & Breaches**

Backdoors & Breaches is a card-based TTX developed and published under a GNU license by Black Hills Information Security. It’s a novel game designed to teach both technical and non-technical players cybersecurity incident response in a format similar to the popular Dungeons & Dragons roleplaying game. Here’s an example of gameplay at the RSA Conference, with the digital version of the game:

If you want to accommodate a specific technical aspect of security, like industrial control systems, the cloud, or threat hunting, you can modify Backdoors & Breaches with expansion decks. Customizing cards to reflect your team's unique circumstances can result in better buy-in and even a higher level of preparedness when a breach occurs.

**Talos and NetHope create a new expansion**

It was this potential customization that attracted me to making a new expansion deck for the international humanitarian community. The concept of Talos and NetHope adapting a cost-effective, portable, and easy-to-understand TTX to fit the limited cybersecurity budgets of typical NGOs was irresistible. To bring this vision to life, I assembled a diverse team of seasoned cybersecurity NGO professionals, technologists, and crisis response specialists who recognized the value in developing new cards.

The result was a new deck that seamlessly merged into the original Backdoors & Breaches game. These unique cards are modeled from real events and speak to the unique technical, political, and logistical challenges that humanitarian assistance organizations may face during cyber attacks. Here are some examples:

__Imagine that an angry mob raids your NGO’s office. You’re trying to do digital forensics, but your team is forced to leave the country! What do you do?__

We presented this new expansion at the NetHope Global Summit in 2023, where participants widely enjoyed it. We found that this expansion pack brought them together in ways the generic deck on its own likely wouldn’t have. Many people shared first-hand experiences with the stressful situations these cards presented, which led to authentic and open conversations on the best responses to the scenarios.

__Presenting the base deck and expansion pack at the 2023 NetHope Global Summit.__

Over the course of several summits, Talos and NetHope have given away hundreds of physical copies of the expansion, and we’ve received a lot of positive reception from the international NGO community. If you’re curious, you can also find the cards online here.

**The U.S. domestic NGO edition**

In a country as large as the United States, there are hundreds of domestic NGOs that operate solely within the country and local communities. The NGO Information Sharing and Analysis Center (NGO-ISAC) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that focuses on domestic civil society organizations.

Using the momentum of our Backdoors & Breaches international humanitarian expansion pack, Talos partnered with NGO-ISAC to create a new deck that reflects U.S.-specific NGO security situations.

__On-stage demonstration at the__ __Ford Foundation__ __for the NGO-ISAC Conference.__

If the NGO’s team is spread across the country and wants to play, that’s not a problem! Using this GitHub link you can instantiate and connect to a mini web server on your local computer. With a web sharing tool, you can stream it to any size audience and folks can play along virtually. You can easily use Python for this.

**Conclusion**

International and domestic NGOs are critical to aid delivery and civil society, but they’re heavily targeted by threat actors who seek to disrupt or exploit their missions. TTXs like Backdoors & Breaches lower the barrier to entry for organizations to have serious conversations about security posture and response, and NetHope and Talos’ custom expansions provide industry-specific scenarios to enrich the experience.

I feel very fortunate to have had the opportunity to volunteer and donate my time to help NGO workers and volunteers fight the good fight. Whether you’re a threat intelligence organization, an international NGO providing medical care to refugees, or a domestic food bank fighting hunger, Talos is with you.

Tag

#cisco