#git

### Summary It has been found an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the FileBrowser application's share deletion functionality. This vulnerability allows any authenticated user with share permissions to delete other users' shared links without authorization checks. The impact is significant as malicious actors can disrupt business operations by systematically removing shared files and links. This leads to denial of service for legitimate users, potential data loss in collaborative environments, and breach of data confidentiality agreements. In organizational settings, this could affect critical file sharing for projects, presentations, or document collaboration. ### Details **Technical Analysis** The vulnerability exists in` /http/share.go` at lines 72-82. The shareDeleteHandler function processes deletion requests using only the share hash without comparing the link.UserID with the current authenticated user's ID (d.user.ID). This missing authorization check e...

## Impact Applications meeting 2 conditions are at risk of arbitrary JavaScript code execution, even if "safe mode" [expressionInterpreter](https://vega.github.io/vega/usage/interpreter/) is used. 1. Use `vega` in an application that attaches `vega` library and a `vega.View` instance similar to the Vega [Editor](https://github.com/vega/editor) to the global `window` 2. Allow user-defined Vega `JSON` definitions (vs JSON that was is only provided through source code) ## Patches - If using latest Vega line (6.x) - `vega` `6.2.0` / `vega-expression` `6.1.0` / `vega-interpreter` `2.2.1` (if using AST evaluator mode) - If using Vega in a non-ESM environment - ( `vega-expression` `5.2.1` / `1.2.1` (if using AST evaluator mode) ## Workarounds _Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading_ - Do not attach `vega` View instances to global variables, as Vega editor used to do [here](https://github.com/vega/editor/blob/e102355589d23cdd0dbfd607a2cc5...

### Description of Vulnerability: An issue in AWS Wrappers for Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL may allow for privilege escalation to rds_superuser role. A low privilege authenticated user can create a crafted function that could be executed with permissions of other Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) users. AWS recommends customers upgrade to the following versions: AWS Go Wrapper to 2025-10-17. ### Source of Vulnerability Report: Allistair Ishmael Hakim [allistair.hakim@gmail.com](mailto:allistair.hakim@gmail.com) ### Affected products & versions: AWS Go Wrapper < 2025-10-17. ### Platforms: MacOS/Windows/Linux

Internet-facing assets like domains, servers, or networked device endpoints are where attackers look first, probing their target’s infrastructure…

A Russian-speaking threat behind an ongoing, mass phishing campaign has registered more than 4,300 domain names since the start of the year. The activity, per Netcraft security researcher Andrew Brandt, is designed to target customers of the hospitality industry, specifically hotel guests who may have travel reservations with spam emails. The campaign is said to have begun in earnest around

In this week’s newsletter, Amy recounts her journey from Halloween festivities to unraveling the story of the 2022 Viasat satellite hack, with plenty of cybersecurity surprises along the way.

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.3, 10.5.x <= 10.5.11 fail to properly validate team membership permissions in the Add Channel Member API, which allows users from one team to access user metadata and channel membership information from other teams via the API endpoint.

### Impact This affects any Incus user in an environment where an unprivileged user may have root access to a container with an attached custom storage volume that has the `security.shifted` property set to `true` as well as access to the host as an unprivileged user. The most common case for this would be systems using `incus-user` with the less privileged `incus` group to provide unprivileged users with an isolated restricted access to Incus. Such users may be able to create a custom storage volume with the necessary property (depending on kernel and filesystem support) and can then write a setuid binary from within the container which can be executed as an unpriivleged user on the host to gain root privileges. ### Patches A patch for this issue is available here: https://github.com/lxc/incus/pull/2642 The first commit changes the permissions for any new storage pool, the second commit applies it on startup to all existing storage pools. ### Workarounds Permissions can be manuall...

### Impact _What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_ An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability to bypass all authentication mechanisms in the Milvus Proxy component, gaining full administrative access to the Milvus cluster. This grants the attacker the ability to read, modify, or delete data, and to perform privileged administrative operations such as database or collection management. All users running affected Milvus versions are strongly advised to upgrade immediately. ### Patches _Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_ This issue has been fixed in the following versions: • Milvus 2.4.24 • Milvus 2.5.21 • Milvus 2.6.5 Users should upgrade to these patched versions or later to mitigate the vulnerability. ### Workarounds _Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_ If immediate upgrade is not possible, a temporary mitigation can be applied by removing the sourceID header from all in...

### Summary When `Defaults targetpw` (or `Defaults rootpw`) is enabled, the password of the target account (or root account) instead of the invoking user is used for authentication. `sudo-rs` prior to 0.2.10 incorrectly recorded the invoking user’s UID instead of the authenticated-as user's UID in the authentication timestamp. Any later `sudo` invocation on the same terminal while the timestamp was still valid would use that timestamp, potentially bypassing new authentication even if the policy would have required it. ### Impact A highly-privileged user (able to run commands as other users, or as root, through sudo) who knows one password of an account they are allowed to run commands as, would be able to run commands as any other account the policy permits them to run commands for, even if they don't know the password for those accounts. A common instance of this would be that a user can still use their own password to run commands as root (the default behaviour of `sudo`), effectiv...