Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Tag

#git

Fileless protection explained: Blocking the invisible threat others miss

Your antivirus scans files. But what about attacks that never create files? Here's how we catch the threats hiding on your family's computers.

Malwarebytes
#web#ios#mac#windows#git#java#backdoor#auth
Discover the AI Tools Fueling the Next Cybercrime Wave — Watch the Webinar

Remember when phishing emails were easy to spot? Bad grammar, weird formatting, and requests from a "Prince" in a distant country? Those days are over. Today, a 16-year-old with zero coding skills and a $200 allowance can launch a campaign that rivals state-sponsored hackers. They don't need to be smart; they just need to subscribe to the right AI tool. We are witnessing the industrialization of

7 Year Long ShadyPanda Attack Spied on 4.3M Chrome and Edge Users

Koi Security exposes ShadyPanda, a group that used trusted Chrome/Edge extensions to infect 4.3 million users over 7 years for deep surveillance and corporate espionage.

GHSA-mcxq-54f4-mmx5: FeehiCMS Has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

GHSA-qhqw-rrw9-25rm: assyncmy is vulnerable to SQL injection via crafted dict keys

SQL injection vulnerability in long2ice assyncmy thru 0.2.10 allows attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via crafted dict keys.

GHSA-j3rw-fx6g-q46j: Apptainer ineffectively applies selinux and apparmor --security options

### Impact In Apptainer versions less than 1.4.5, a container can disable two of the forms of the little used `--security` option, in particular the forms `--security=apparmor:<profile>` and `--security=selinux:<label>` which otherwise put restrictions on operations that containers can do. The `--security` option has always been mentioned in Apptainer documentation as being a feature for the root user, although these forms do also work for unprivileged users on systems where the corresponding feature is enabled. Apparmor is enabled by default on Debian-based distributions and SElinux is enabled by default on RHEL-based distributions, but on SUSE it depends on the distribution version. In addition, a bug in the detection of selinux support in Apptainer's suid mode means that `--security selinux:<label>` flags may not be applied, even in the absence of an attack. In that case a warning message is emitted indicating that selinux is unavailable, but the warning may be may be overlooked...

GHSA-wwrx-w7c9-rf87: Singluarity ineffectively applies selinux / apparmor LSM process labels

### Impact _**Native Mode (default)**_ Singularity's default native runtime allows users to apply restrictions to container processes using the apparmor or selinux Linux Security Modules (LSMs), via the `--security selinux:<label>` or `--security apparmor:<profile>` flags. LSM labels are written to process or thread `attrs/exec` under `/proc`. If a user relies on LSM restrictions to prevent malicious operations then, under certain circumstances, an attacker can redirect the LSM label write operation so that it is ineffective. This requires: * The attacker to cause the user to run a malicious container image that redirects the mount of `/proc` to the destination of a shared mount, either known to be configured on the target system, or that will be specified by the user when running the container. * Control of the content of the shared mount, for example through another malicious container which also binds it, or as a user with relevant permissions on the host system it is bound from...

GHSA-cchq-397m-q2qm: Grav CMS is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in the page editor

Grav CMS 1.7.49 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS). The page editor allows authenticated users to edit page content via a Markdown editor. The editor fails to properly sanitize <script> tags, allowing stored XSS payloads to execute when pages are viewed in the admin interface.

GHSA-rqw2-ghq9-44m7: Django is vulnerable to SQL injection in column aliases

An issue was discovered in 5.2 before 5.2.9, 5.1 before 5.1.15, and 4.2 before 4.2.27. `FilteredRelation` is subject to SQL injection in column aliases, using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the `**kwargs` passed to `QuerySet.annotate()` or `QuerySet.alias()` on PostgreSQL. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Stackered for reporting this issue.

GHSA-69jw-4jj8-fcxm: gokey allows secret recovery from a seed file without the master password

In gokey versions `<0.2.0`, a flaw in the seed decryption logic resulted in passwords incorrectly being derived solely from the initial vector and the AES-GCM authentication tag of the key seed. This issue has been fixed in gokey version `0.2.0`. This is a breaking change. The fix has invalidated any passwords/secrets that were derived from the seed file (using the `-s` option). Even if the input seed file stays the same, version `0.2.0` gokey will generate different secrets. ### Impact This vulnerability impacts generated keys/secrets using a seed file as an entropy input (using the `-s` option). Keys/secrets generated just from the master password (without the `-s` option) are not impacted. The confidentiality of the seed itself is also not impacted (it is not required to regenerate the seed itself). Specific impact includes: * keys/secrets generated from a seed file may have lower entropy: it was expected that the whole seed would be used to generate keys (240 bytes of entropy i...