#js

A directory traversal vulnerability exists in modelscope/agentscope version 0.0.4. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to read any local JSON file by sending a crafted POST request to the /read-examples endpoint.

A path traversal vulnerability exists in the save-workflow and load-workflow functionality of modelscope/agentscope versions prior to the fix. This vulnerability allows an attacker to read and write arbitrary JSON files on the filesystem, potentially leading to the exposure or modification of sensitive information such as configuration files, API keys, and hardcoded passwords.

In h2oai/h2o-3 version 3.46.0, the `/99/Models/{name}/json` endpoint allows for arbitrary file overwrite on the target server. The vulnerability arises from the `exportModelDetails` function in `ModelsHandler.java`, where the user-controllable `mexport.dir` parameter is used to specify the file path for writing model details. This can lead to overwriting files at arbitrary locations on the host system.

A flaw was found in the OpenShift Console, an endpoint for plugins to serve resources in multiple languages: /locales/resources.json. This endpoint's lng and ns parameters are used to construct a filepath in pkg/plugins/handlers unsafely.go#L112 Because of this unsafe filepath construction, an authenticated user can manipulate the path to retrieve any JSON files on the console's pod by using sequences of ../ and valid directory paths.

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability on Liferay Portal 7.4.3.82 through 7.4.3.128, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q3.0, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.12, 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.10, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 update 82 through update 92 in the Frontend JS module's layout-taglib/__liferay__/index.js allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via toastData parameter

### Summary By sending a crafted HTTP request to a server behind an CDN, it is possible in some circumstances to poison the CDN cache and highly impacts the availability of a site. It is possible to craft a request, such as `https://mysite.com/?/_payload.json` which will be rendered as JSON. If the CDN in front of a Nuxt site ignores the query string when determining whether to cache a route, then this JSON response could be served to future visitors to the site. ### Impact An attacker can perform this attack to a vulnerable site in order to make a site unavailable indefinitely. It is also possible in the case where the cache will be reset to make a small script to send a request each X seconds (=caching duration) so that the cache is permanently poisoned making the site completely unavailable. ## Conclusion : This is similar to a vulnerability in Next.js that resulted in CVE-2024-46982 (and see [this article](https://zhero-web-sec.github.io/research-and-things/nextjs-cache-and...

### Summary The `fast-jwt` library does not properly validate the `iss` claim based on the RFC https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7519#page-9. #### Details The `iss` (issuer) claim validation within the fast-jwt library permits an array of strings as a valid `iss` value. This design flaw enables a potential attack where a malicious actor crafts a JWT with an `iss` claim structured as `['https://attacker-domain/', 'https://valid-iss']`. Due to the permissive validation, the JWT will be deemed valid. Furthermore, if the application relies on external libraries like `get-jwks` that do not independently validate the `iss` claim, the attacker can leverage this vulnerability to forge a JWT that will be accepted by the victim application. Essentially, the attacker can insert their own domain into the `iss` array, alongside the legitimate issuer, and bypass the intended security checks. #### PoC Take a server running the following code: ```js const express = require('express') const ...

### Impact User control of the first argument of the `addImage` method results in CPU utilization and denial of service. If given the possibility to pass unsanitized image urls to the `addImage` method, a user can provide a harmful data-url that results in high CPU utilization and denial of service. Other affected methods are: `html`, `addSvgAsImage`. Example payload: ```js import { jsPDF } from "jpsdf" const doc = new jsPDF(); const payload = 'data:/charset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=scharset=s\x00base64,undefined'; const startTime = performance.now() try { doc.addImage(payload, "PNG", 10, 40, 180, 180, undefined, "SLOW"); } catch (err) { const endTime = performance.now() console.log(`Call to doc.addImage took ${endTime - startTime} milliseconds`) } doc.save("a4.pdf");...

View CSAF 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CVSS v4 8.7 ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity Vendor: Schneider Electric Equipment: ASCO 5310 / 5350 Vulnerabilities: Download of Code Without Integrity Check, Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling, Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information, Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type 2. RISK EVALUATION Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to perform a denial of service, loss of availability, or loss of device integrity. 3. TECHNICAL DETAILS 3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS Schneider Electric reports the following products are affected: Schneider Electric ASCO 5310 Single-Channel Remote Annunciator: All versions Schneider Electric ASCO 5350 Eight Channel Remote Annunciator: All versions 3.2 VULNERABILITY OVERVIEW 3.2.1 DOWNLOAD OF CODE WITHOUT INTEGRITY CHECK CWE-494 Schneider Electric ASCO 5310 / 5350 remote annunciator is vulnerable to a download of code without integrity check vulner...

A vulnerability allows users to manipulate the final payment amount processed by PayPal. If a user modifies the item quantity in their shopping cart after initiating the PayPal Checkout process, PayPal will not receive the updated total amount. As a result, PayPal captures only the initially transmitted amount, while Sylius incorrectly considers the order fully paid based on the modified total. This flaw can be exploited both accidentally and intentionally, potentially enabling fraud by allowing customers to pay less than the actual order value. ### Impact - Attackers can intentionally pay less than the actual total order amount. - Business owners may suffer financial losses due to underpaid orders. - Integrity of payment processing is compromised. ### Patches The issue is fixed in versions: 1.6.1, 1.7.1, 2.0.1 and above. ### Workarounds To resolve the problem in the end application without updating to the newest patches, there is a need to overwrite `ProcessPayPalOrderAction` wi...