#maven

Path traversal vulnerability with the downloading and installation of Xuggler in Liferay Portal 7.0.0 through 7.4.3.4, and Liferay DXP 7.4 GA, 7.3 GA through update 34, and older unsupported versions allows remote attackers to (1) add files to arbitrary locations on the server and (2) download and execute arbitrary files from the download server via the `_com_liferay_server_admin_web_portlet_ServerAdminPortlet_jarName` parameter.

### Impact The title of every single page whose reference is known can be accessed through the REST API as long as an XClass with a page property is accessible, this is the default for an XWiki installation. This allows an attacker to get titles of pages whose reference is known, one title per request. This doesn't affect fully [private wikis](https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/AdminGuide/Access%20Rights/#HPrivateWiki) as the REST endpoint checks access rights on the XClass definition. The impact on confidentiality depends on the strategy for page names. By default, page names match the title, so the impact should be low but if page names are intentionally obfuscated because the titles are sensitive, the impact could be high. ### Patches This has been fixed in XWiki 16.4.7, 16.10.3 and 17.0.0 by adding access control checks before getting the title of any page. ### Workarounds We're not aware of any workarounds.

### Impact Any user with edit right on a page (could be the user's profile) can execute code (Groovy, Python, Velocity) with programming right by defining a wiki macro. This allows full access to the whole XWiki installation and thus impacts its confidentiality, integrity and availability. The main problem is that if a wiki macro parameter allows wiki syntax, its default value is executed with the rights of the author of the document where it is used. This can be exploited by overriding a macro like the `children` macro that is used in a page that has programming right like the page `XWiki.ChildrenMacro` and thus allows arbitrary script macros. The full reproduction steps can be found in the [original issue](https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-22760). ### Patches This vulnerability has been patched in XWiki 16.4.7, 16.10.3 and 17.0.0 by executing wiki parameters with the rights of the wiki macro's author when the parameter's value is the default value. ### Workarounds We're not aware...

### Impact When editing content that contains "dangerous" macros like malicious script macros that were authored by a user with fewer rights, XWiki warns about the execution of these macros since XWiki 15.9RC1. These required rights analyzers that trigger these warnings are incomplete, allowing an attacker to hide malicious content. For most macros, the existing analyzers don't consider non-lowercase parameters. Further, most macro parameters that can contain XWiki syntax like titles of information boxes weren't analyzed at all. Similarly, the "source" parameters of the content and context macro weren't anylzed even though they could contain arbitrary XWiki syntax. In the worst case, this could allow a malicious to add malicious script macros including Groovy or Python macros to a page that are then executed after another user with programming righs edits the page, thus allowing remote code execution. ### Patches The required rights analyzers have been made more robust and extended to...

### Impact Pages can gain script or programming rights when they contain a link and the target of the link is renamed or moved. This might lead to execution of scripts contained in xobjects that should have never been executed. This vulnerability affects all version of XWiki since 8.2 and 7.4.5. ### Patches The patch consists in only setting the `originalMetadataAuthor` when performing such change, so that it's displayed in the history but it has no impact on the right evaluation (i.e. the original author of the changes is still used for right computation). This patch has been applied on XWiki 16.4.7, 17.1.0RC1, 16.10.4. ### Workarounds There's no workaround for this vulnerability, except preventing to perform any refactoring operation with users having more than edit rights. Administrators are strongly advised to upgrade. If not possible, the patch only impacts module `xwiki-platform-refactoring-default` so it's possible to apply the commit and rebuild and deploy only that mo...

### Description In Spring Framework, versions 6.0.x as of 6.0.5, versions 6.1.x and 6.2.x, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a “Content-Disposition” header with a non-ASCII charset, where the filename attribute is derived from user-supplied input. Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all the following are true: - The header is prepared with `org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition`. - The filename is set via `ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset)`. - The value for the filename is derived from user-supplied input. - The application does not sanitize the user-supplied input. - The downloaded content of the response is injected with malicious commands by the attacker (see RFD paper reference for details). An application is not vulnerable if any of the following is true: - The application does not set a “Content-Disposition” response header. - The header is not prepared with `org.spri...

### Summary Missing checks allow for SSRF to specific targets using the TestWfsPost enpoint. ### Mitigation To manage the proxy base value as a system administrator, use the parameter ``PROXY_BASE_URL`` to provide a non-empty value that cannot be overridden by the user interface or incoming request.[thomsmith](https://github.com/thomsmith). ### Resolution The TestWfsPost has been replaced in GeoServer 2.25.2 and GeoServer 2.24.4 with a JavaScript [Demo Requests](https://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/configuration/demos/index.html#demo-requests) page to test OGC Web Services. ### References * [CVE-2024-29198](https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/security/advisories/GHSA-5gw5-jccf-6hxw) Unauthenticated SSRF via TestWfsPost

### Impact GeoNetwork WFS Index functionality is affected by GeoTools XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability during schema validation. This vulnerability is particularly severe as the REST API endpoint was not secured, potentially allowing unauthenticated attackers to read sensitive files ### Patches GeoNetwork 4.4.8 / 4.2.13. ### Workarounds Remove the ``gn-wfsfeature-harvester`` and ``gn-camelPeriodicProducer`` jars, disabling the WFS Index functionality. ### References - [GHSA-826p-4gcg-35vw](https://github.com/geotools/geotools/security/advisories/GHSA-826p-4gcg-35vw) - https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/8757 - https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/8803 - https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/8812

### Summary An improper URI validation vulnerability exists that enables an unauthorized attacker to perform XML External Entities (XEE) attack, then send GET request to any HTTP server. Attacker can abuse this to scan internal networks and gain information about them then exploit further. Moreover, attacker can read limited `.xsd` file on system. ### Details By default, GeoServer use `PreventLocalEntityResolver` class from GeoTools to filter out malicious URIs in XML entities before resolving them. The URI must match the regex `(?i)(jar:file|http|vfs)[^?#;]*\\.xsd`. But the regex leaves a chance for attackers to request to any HTTP server or limited file. ### Impact An unauthenticated attacker can: 1. Scan internal network to gain insight about it and exploit further. 2. SSRF to endpoint ends with `.xsd`. 3. Read limited `.xsd` file on system. ### Mitigation 1. Define the system property ``ENTITY_RESOLUTION_ALLOWLIST`` to limit the supported external schema locaitons. 2. The buil...

### Summary It possible to achieve Service Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the Demo request endpoint if Proxy Base URL has not been set. ### Details A unauthenticated user can supply a request that will be issued by the server. This can be used to enumerate internal networks and also in the case of cloud instances can be used to obtain sensitive data. ### Mitigation 1. When using GeoServer with a proxy, manage the proxy base value as a system administrator, use the application property ``PROXY_BASE_URL`` to provide a non-empty value that cannot be overridden by the user interface or incoming request. 2. When using GeoServer directly without a proxy, block all access to TestWfsPost by editing the web.xml file. Adding this block right before the end: ```xml <security-constraint> <web-resource-collection> <web-resource-name>BlockDemoRequests</web-resource-name> <url-pattern>/TestWfsPost/*</url-pattern> </web-resource-coll...