#nodejs

### Impact User control of the first argument of the loadFile method in the node.js build allows local file inclusion/path traversal. If given the possibility to pass unsanitized paths to the loadFile method, a user can retrieve file contents of arbitrary files in the local file system the node process is running in. The file contents are included verbatim in the generated PDFs. Other affected methods are: `addImage`, `html`, `addFont`. Only the node.js builds of the library are affected, namely the `dist/jspdf.node.js` and `dist/jspdf.node.min.js` files. Example attack vector: ```js import { jsPDF } from "./dist/jspdf.node.js"; const doc = new jsPDF(); doc.addImage("./secret.txt", "JPEG", 0, 0, 10, 10); doc.save("test.pdf"); // the generated PDF will contain the "secret.txt" file ``` ### Patches The vulnerability has been fixed in jsPDF@4.0.0. This version restricts file system access per default. This semver-major update does not introduce other breaking changes. ### Workaro...

The year opened without a reset. The same pressure carried over, and in some places it tightened. Systems people assume are boring or stable are showing up in the wrong places. Attacks moved quietly, reused familiar paths, and kept working longer than anyone wants to admit. This week’s stories share one pattern. Nothing flashy. No single moment. Just steady abuse of trust — updates, extensions,

### Summary **Description** A Path Traversal (CWE-22) vulnerability in AdonisJS multipart file handling may allow a remote attacker to write arbitrary files to arbitrary locations on the server filesystem. This impacts @adonisjs/bodyparser through version 10.1.1 and 11.x prerelease versions prior to 11.0.0-next.6. This issue has been patched in @adonisjs/bodyparser versions 10.1.2 and 11.0.0-next.6. ### Details AdonisJS parses `multipart/form-data` via `BodyParser` and exposes uploads as `MultipartFile`. The issue is in the `MultipartFile.move(location, options)` default options. If `options.name` isn't provided, it defaults to the unsanitized client filename and builds the destination with `path.join(location, name)`, allowing a traversal to escape the default or intended directory chosen by the developer. If `options.overwrite` isn't provided, it defaults to true, allowing file overwrites. The documentation previously demonstrated examples leading developers to this vulnerable code...

The SignalK appstore interface allows administrators to install npm packages through a REST API endpoint. While the endpoint validates that the package name exists in the npm registry as a known plugin or webapp, the version parameter accepts arbitrary npm version specifiers including URLs. npm supports installing packages from git repositories, GitHub shorthand syntax, and HTTP/HTTPS URLs pointing to tarballs. When npm installs a package, it can automatically execute any `postinstall` script defined in `package.json`, enabling arbitrary code execution. The vulnerability exists because npm's version specifier syntax is extremely flexible, and the SignalK code passes the version parameter directly to npm without sanitization. An attacker with admin access can install a package from an attacker-controlled source containing a malicious `postinstall` script. ### Affected Code **File**: `src/interfaces/appstore.js` (lines 46-76) ```javascript app.post( [ `${SERVERROUTESPREFIX}/app...

### Summary A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to crash the SignalK Server by flooding the access request endpoint (`/signalk/v1/access/requests`). This causes a "JavaScript heap out of memory" error due to unbounded in-memory storage of request objects. ### Details The vulnerability is caused by a lack of rate limiting and improper memory management for incoming access requests. **Vulnerable Code Analysis:** 1. **In-Memory Storage**: In `src/requestResponse.js`, requests are stored in a simple JavaScript object: ```javascript const requests = {} ``` 2. **Unbounded Growth**: The `createRequest` function adds new requests to this object without checking the current size or count of existing requests. 3. **Infrequent Pruning**: The `pruneRequests` function, which removes old requests, runs only once every **15 minutes** (`pruneIntervalRate`). 4. **No Rate Limiting**: The endpoint `/signalk/v1/access/requests` accepts POST requests...

### Summary An unauthenticated attacker can pollute the internal state (`restoreFilePath`) of the server via the `/skServer/validateBackup` endpoint. This allows the attacker to hijack the administrator's "Restore" functionality to overwrite critical server configuration files (e.g., `security.json`, `package.json`), leading to account takeover and Remote Code Execution (RCE). ### Details The vulnerability is caused by the use of a module-level global variable `restoreFilePath` in `src/serverroutes.ts`, which is shared across all requests. **Vulnerable Code Analysis:** 1. **Global State**: `restoreFilePath` is defined at the top level of the module. ```typescript // src/serverroutes.ts let restoreFilePath: string ``` 2. **Unauthenticated State Pollution**: The `/skServer/validateBackup` endpoint updates this variable. Crucially, this endpoint **lacks authentication middleware**, allowing any user to access it. ```typescript app.post(`${SERVERROUTESPREFIX}/va...

The first ThreatsDay Bulletin of 2026 lands on a day that already feels symbolic — new year, new breaches, new tricks. If the past twelve months taught defenders anything, it’s that threat actors don’t pause for holidays or resolutions. They just evolve faster. This week’s round-up shows how subtle shifts in behavior, from code tweaks to job scams, are rewriting what “cybercrime” looks like in

### Summary A command injection vulnerability exists in the Serverless Framework's built-in MCP server package (@serverless/mcp). This vulnerability only affects users of the experimental MCP server feature (serverless mcp), which represents less than 0.1% of Serverless Framework users. The core Serverless Framework CLI and deployment functionality are not affected. The vulnerability is caused by the unsanitized use of input parameters within a call to `child_process.exec`, enabling an attacker to inject arbitrary system commands. Successful exploitation can lead to remote code execution under the server process's privileges. The server constructs and executes shell commands using unvalidated user input directly within command-line strings. This introduces the possibility of shell metacharacter injection (`|`, `>`, `&&`, etc.). ### Details The MCP Server exposes several tools, including the `list-project`. The values of the parameter `workspaceRoots` (controlled by the user) is ...

Cybersecurity researchers have disclosed details of what appears to be a new strain of Shai Hulud on the npm registry with slight modifications from the previous wave observed last month. The npm package that embeds the novel Shai Hulud strain is "@vietmoney/react-big-calendar," which was uploaded to npm back in March 2021 by a user named "hoquocdat." It was updated for the first time on

### Summary The `arrayLimit` option in qs does not enforce limits for bracket notation (`a[]=1&a[]=2`), allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. Applications using `arrayLimit` for DoS protection are vulnerable. ### Details The `arrayLimit` option only checks limits for indexed notation (`a[0]=1&a[1]=2`) but completely bypasses it for bracket notation (`a[]=1&a[]=2`). **Vulnerable code** (`lib/parse.js:159-162`): ```javascript if (root === '[]' && options.parseArrays) { obj = utils.combine([], leaf); // No arrayLimit check } ``` **Working code** (`lib/parse.js:175`): ```javascript else if (index <= options.arrayLimit) { // Limit checked here obj = []; obj[index] = leaf; } ``` The bracket notation handler at line 159 uses `utils.combine([], leaf)` without validating against `options.arrayLimit`, while indexed notation at line 175 checks `index <= options.arrayLimit` before creating arrays. ### PoC **Test 1 - Basic bypass:** ```bash npm i...