#ssl

**Why is this OpenSSL Software Foundation CVE included in the Security Update Guide?** The vulnerability assigned to this CVE is in OpenSSL Software which is consumed by the Microsoft products listed in the Security Updates table and are known to be affected. It is being documented in the Security Update Guide to announce that the latest builds of these products are no longer vulnerable. Please see Security Update Guide Supports CVEs Assigned by Industry Partners for more information.

Summary Summary Microsoft is aware and actively addressing the impact associated with the recent OpenSSL vulnerabilities announced on October 25th 2022, fixed in version 3.0.7. As part of our standard processes, we are rolling out fixes for impacted services. Any customer action that is required will be highlighted in this blog and our associated Security Update Guides (CVE-2022-3786 Security Update Guide and CVE-2022-3602 Security Update Guide).

**Why is this OpenSSL Software Foundation CVE included in the Security Update Guide?** The vulnerability assigned to this CVE is in OpenSSL Software which is consumed by the Microsoft products listed in the Security Updates table and are known to be affected. It is being documented in the Security Update Guide to announce that the latest builds of these products are no longer vulnerable. Please see Security Update Guide Supports CVEs Assigned by Industry Partners for more information.

Summary Summary Microsoft is aware and actively addressing the impact associated with the recent OpenSSL vulnerabilities announced on October 25th 2022, fixed in version 3.0.7. As part of our standard processes, we are rolling out fixes for impacted services. Any customer action that is required will be highlighted in this blog and our associated Security Update Guides (CVE-2022-3786 Security Update Guide and CVE-2022-3602 Security Update Guide).

A vulnerability has been found in Axiomatic Bento4 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component mp4mux. The manipulation leads to memory leak. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-212683.

Organizations should update to the latest encryption (version 3.0.7) as soon as possible, but there's no need for Heartbleed-like panic, security experts say.

In late October two new buffer overflow vulnerabilities, CVE-2022-3602 and CVE-2022-3786, were announced in OpenSSL versions 3.0.0 to 3.0.6. These vulnerabilities can be exploited by sending an X.509 certificate with a specially crafted email address, potentially causing a buffer overflow resulting in a crash or

Punycode-related flaw fails the logo test

An update for openssl is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Important. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVE link(s) in the References section.This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). If you distribute this content, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat Inc. and provide a link to the original. Related CVEs: * CVE-2022-3602: OpenSSL: X.509 Email Address Buffer Overflow * CVE-2022-3786: OpenSSL: X.509 Email Address Variable Length Buffer Overflow

Ubuntu Security Notice 5710-1 - It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled certain X.509 Email Addresses. If a certificate authority were tricked into signing a specially-crafted certificate, a remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. The default compiler options for affected releases reduce the vulnerability to a denial of service. It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled applications creating custom ciphers via the legacy EVP_CIPHER_meth_new function. This issue could cause certain applications that mishandled values to the function to possibly end up with a NULL cipher and messages in plaintext.