#ubuntu

### **Vulnerability Description** #### Vulnerability Overview 1. During the artifact extraction process, the `unpack()` function extracts the compressed file to a temporary directory (`/etc.tmpdir`) and then attempts to move its contents to `/etc` using the `rename()` system call, 2. However, since `/etc` is an already existing system directory, the `rename()` system call fails, making normal archive extraction impossible. 3. At this point, if a malicious user sets the entry name inside the `tar.gz` file to a path traversal like `../../../../../etc/zipslip-poc`, 4. The `untar()` function combines paths using `filepath.Join(dest, filepath.Clean(header.Name))` without path validation, resulting in `target = "/work/input/../../../../../etc/zipslip-poc"`, 5. Ultimately, the `/etc/zipslip-poc` file is created, bypassing the normal archive extraction constraints and enabling direct file writing to system directories. #### untar(): Writing Files Outside the Extraction Directory https://gi...

### Description OIDC authentication uses cookies with the SameSite=Strict attribute, preventing cookies from being sent with requests from other sites. Therefore, CSRF does not occur as long as web services in a Same Site relationship (same eTLD+1) with the origin running LXD-UI are trusted. However, since the SameSite concept does not apply to client certificates, CSRF protection that doesn't rely on the SameSite attribute is necessary. Note that when using cross-origin fetch API, client certificates are not sent in no-cors mode due to CORS restrictions (according to the WHATWG Fetch specification(https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#credentials), client certificates are treated as credentials), making cross-site attacks using fetch API difficult unless CORS settings are vulnerable. However, since LXD's API parses request bodies as JSON even when `Content-Type` is `text/plain` or `application/x-www-form-urlencoded`, CSRF attacks exploiting HTML form submissions are possible. ### Reproduc...

Cybersecurity researchers have disclosed details of a new botnet that customers can rent access to conduct distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks against targets of interest. The ShadowV2 botnet, according to Darktrace, predominantly targets misconfigured Docker containers on Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud servers to deploy a Go-based malware that turns infected systems into attack nodes

Microsoft on Tuesday addressed a set of 80 security flaws in its software, including one vulnerability that has been disclosed as publicly known at the time of release. Of the 80 vulnerabilities, eight are rated Critical and 72 are rated Important in severity. None of the shortcomings has been exploited in the wild as a zero-day. Like last month, 38 of the disclosed flaws are related to

Akamai finds new Docker malware blocking rivals on exposed APIs, replacing cryptominers with tools that hint at early botnet development.

### Impact An out-of-bounds read was found in Exiv2 versions v0.28.5 and earlier. Exiv2 is a command-line utility and C++ library for reading, writing, deleting, and modifying the metadata of image files. The out-of-bounds read is triggered when Exiv2 is used to write metadata into a crafted image file. An attacker could potentially exploit the vulnerability to cause a denial of service by crashing Exiv2, if they can trick the victim into running Exiv2 on a crafted image file. Note that this bug is only triggered when writing the metadata, which is a less frequently used Exiv2 operation than reading the metadata. For example, to trigger the bug in the Exiv2 command-line application, you need to add an extra command-line argument such as delete. ### Patches The bug is fixed in version v0.28.6. ### Credit Thank you to @dragonArthurX for reporting this issue. ### Details (from original report by @dragonArthurX ) **Version:** Tested on v0.28.5 (latest official release) Commit: 907169fa...

## Summary In ImageMagick's `magick stream` command, specifying multiple consecutive `%d` format specifiers in a filename template causes a memory leak. ## Details - **Vulnerability Type:** Memory leak - **Affected Version:** ImageMagick 7.1.1-47 (as of commit 82572afc, June 2025) ## Reproduction ### Tested Environment - **Operating System:** Ubuntu 22.04 LTS - **Architecture:** x86_64 - **Compiler:** gcc with AddressSanitizer (gcc version: 11.4.0) ### Reproduction Steps ```bash # Clone source git clone --depth 1 --branch 7.1.1-47 https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick.git ImageMagick-7.1.1 cd ImageMagick-7.1.1 # Build with ASan CFLAGS="-g -O0 -fsanitize=address -fno-omit-frame-pointer" CXXFLAGS="$CFLAGS" LDFLAGS="-fsanitize=address" ./configure --enable-maintainer-mode --enable-shared && make -j$(nproc) && make install # Trigger crash ./utilities/magick stream %d%d a a ``` ### Output ``` $ magick stream %d%d a a stream: no decode delegate for this image format `' @ erro...

## Summary In ImageMagick's `magick mogrify` command, specifying multiple consecutive `%d` format specifiers in a filename template causes internal pointer arithmetic to generate an address below the beginning of the stack buffer, resulting in a stack overflow through `vsnprintf()`. ## Details - **Vulnerability Type:** CWE-124: Buffer Underwrite - **Affected Component:** MagickCore/image.c - Format processing within InterpretImageFilename() - **Affected Version:** ImageMagick 7.1.1-47 (as of commit 82572afc, June 2025) - **CWE-124: Buffer Underwrite:** A vulnerability where writing occurs to memory addresses before the beginning of a buffer. This is caused by a design flaw in fixed offset correction, resulting in negative pointer arithmetic during consecutive format specifier processing. ## Reproduction ### Tested Environment - **Operating System:** Ubuntu 22.04 LTS - **Architecture:** x86_64 - **Compiler:** gcc with AddressSanitizer (gcc version: 11.4.0) ### Reproduction Steps ...

As of January 10, 2023, CISA will no longer be updating ICS security advisories for Siemens product vulnerabilities beyond the initial advisory. For the most up-to-date information on vulnerabilities in this advisory, please see Siemens' ProductCERT Security Advisories (CERT Services | Services | Siemens Global). View CSAF 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CVSS v3 9.1 ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity Vendor: Siemens Equipment: Third-Party Components in SINEC OS Vulnerabilities: Improper Input Validation, Use After Free, Out-of-bounds Read, Incorrect Check of Function Return Value, Incorrect Comparison, Improper Control of Resource Identifiers ('Resource Injection'), Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'), NULL Pointer Dereference, Excessive Platform Resource Consumption within a Loop, Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling, Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer, Buffer Copy with...

### Summary A command injection vulnerability exists in the `mcp-package-docs` MCP Server. The vulnerability is caused by the unsanitized use of input parameters within a call to `child_process.exec`, enabling an attacker to inject arbitrary system commands. Successful exploitation can lead to remote code execution under the server process's privileges. The server constructs and executes shell commands using unvalidated user input directly within command-line strings. This introduces the possibility of shell metacharacter injection (`|`, `>`, `&&`, etc.). ### Details The MCP Server exposes tools to access documentation for several types of packages. An MCP Client can be instructed to execute additional actions for example via prompt injection when asked to read package documentation. Below some example of vulnerable code and different ways to test this vulnerability including a real example of indirect prompt injection that can lead to arbitrary command injection. ### Vulnerable...