#ssrf

### Summary A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Open WebUI allows any authenticated user to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs. This can be exploited to access cloud metadata endpoints (AWS/GCP/Azure), scan internal networks, access internal services behind firewalls, and exfiltrate sensitive information. No special permissions beyond basic authentication are required. ### Details The vulnerability exists in the /api/v1/retrieval/process/web endpoint located in backend/open_webui/routers/retrieval.py at lines 1758-1767. Vulnerable code: @router.post("/process/web") def process_web( request: Request, form_data: ProcessUrlForm, user=Depends(get_verified_user) ): try: collection_name = form_data.collection_name if not collection_name: collection_name = calculate_sha256_string(form_data.url)[:63] content, docs = get_content_from_url(request, form_data.url) # ← SSRF vulnerability Th...

### Summary The gateway determines the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF (CWE-918) attack ### Impact This vulnerability can be exploited to force the server to make requests to arbitrary hosts on the internal network. This could allow an attacker to exfiltrate sensitive data, for instance, by accessing the AWS metadata service. ### Patches The issue is patched in 1.14.0 (https://github.com/Portkey-AI/gateway/pull/1372) The vulnerability resides within the gateway's request processing function which handles the `x-portkey-custom-host` header. This parameter was passed directly or with insufficient validation/sanitization to an internal HTTP request function. **The fix (v1.14.0) implements a robust allow-list policy:** 1. All custom host inputs are now strictly validated to ensure the resulting UR...

## Description An XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability was identified. The application accepts XML input through a specific endpoint ``/geoserver/wms`` operation ``GetMap``. However, this input is not sufficiently sanitized or restricted, allowing an attacker to define external entities within the XML request. An XML External Entity attack is a type of attack that occurs when XML input containing a reference to an external entity is processed by a weakly configured XML parser. This attack may lead to the disclosure of confidential data, denial of service, port scanning from the perspective of the machine where the parser is located, and other system impacts. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can: - Read arbitrary files from the server's file system. - Conduct Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) to interact with internal systems. - Execute Denial of Service (DoS) attacks by exhausting resources. ## Resolution Update to GeoServer 2.25.6, GeoServer 2.26.3, or GeoServer ...

### Summary A recently patched SSRF vulnerability contains a bypass method that can bypass the existing security fix and still allow SSRF to occur. Because the existing fix only applies security restrictions to the first URL request, a 302 redirect can bypass existing security measures and successfully access the intranet. ### Details Use the following script to deploy on the attacker's server. Since ports 80, 443, and 8080 are default ports within the security range set by the administrator and will not be blocked, the service is deployed on port 8080. ``` from flask import Flask, redirect app = Flask(__name__) @app.route('/redirect') def ssrf_redirect(): return redirect('http://127.0.0.1:8003/uid.txt', code=302) if __name__ == '__main__': app.run(host='0.0.0.0', port=8080) ``` Then, a request is made to the malicious service opened by the attacker, and it can be found that the resources on the intranet are successfully accessed. <img width="663" height="...

This week showed just how fast things can go wrong when no one’s watching. Some attacks were silent and sneaky. Others used tools we trust every day — like AI, VPNs, or app stores — to cause damage without setting off alarms. It’s not just about hacking anymore. Criminals are building systems to make money, spy, or spread malware like it’s a business. And in some cases, they’re using the same

## Summary In impacted versions of Astro using [on-demand rendering](https://docs.astro.build/en/guides/on-demand-rendering/), request headers `x-forwarded-proto` and `x-forwarded-port` are insecurely used, without sanitization, to build the URL. This has several consequences the most important of which are: - Middleware-based protected route bypass (only via `x-forwarded-proto`) - DoS via cache poisoning (if a CDN is present) - SSRF (only via `x-forwarded-proto`) - URL pollution (potential SXSS, if a CDN is present) - WAF bypass ## Details The `x-forwarded-proto` and `x-forwarded-port` headers are used without sanitization in two parts of the Astro server code. The most important is in the `createRequest()` function. Any configuration, including the default one, is affected: [https://github.com/withastro/astro/blob/970ac0f51172e1e6bff4440516a851e725ac3097/packages/astro/src/core/app/node.ts#L97](https://github.com/withastro/astro/blob/970ac0f51172e1e6bff4440516a851e725ac3097/pa...

View CSAF 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CVSS v4 9.3 ATTENTION: Low attack complexity Vendor: Rockwell Automation Equipment: Studio 5000 Simulation Interface Vulnerabilities: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'), Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) 2. RISK EVALUATION Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow attackers to trigger outbound SMB requests to capture NTLM hashes and execute scripts with Administrator privileges upon system reboot. 3. TECHNICAL DETAILS 3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS The following versions of Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Simulation Interface are affected: Studio 5000 Simulation Interface: Version 2.02 and prior 3.2 VULNERABILITY OVERVIEW 3.2.1 IMPROPER LIMITATION OF A PATHNAME TO A RESTRICTED DIRECTORY ('PATH TRAVERSAL') CWE-22 A local code execution security issue exists within Studio 5000 Simulation Interface via the API. This vulnerability allows any Windows user on the system to extract files using path traversal...

SUMMARY We have identified and verified an SSRF vulnerability where webhook URLs are not validated, allowing repository administrators to create webhooks targeting internal services, private networks, and cloud metadata endpoints. AFFECTED COMPONENTS (VERIFIED) 1. Webhook Creation (pkg/ssh/cmd/webhooks.go:125) 2. Backend CreateWebhook (pkg/backend/webhooks.go:17) 3. Backend UpdateWebhook (pkg/backend/webhooks.go:122) 4. Webhook Delivery (pkg/webhook/webhook.go:97) IMPACT This vulnerability allows repository administrators to perform SSRF attacks, potentially enabling: a) Cloud Metadata Theft - Access AWS/Azure/GCP credentials via 169.254.169.254 b) Internal Network Access - Target localhost and private networks (10.x, 192.168.x, 172.16.x) c) Port Scanning - Enumerate internal services via response codes and timing d) Data Exfiltration - Full HTTP responses stored in webhook delivery logs e) Internal API Access - Call internal admin panels and Kubernetes endpoints PROOF OF CONCE...

Monsta FTP users must update now! A critical pre-authentication flaw (CVE-2025-34299) allows hackers to fully take over web servers. Patch to version 2.11.3 immediately.

### Impact A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the file upload functionality when trying to upload a `Parse.File` with `uri` parameter allows to execute an arbitrary URI. The vulnerability stems from a file upload feature in which Parse Server retrieves the file data from a URI that is provided in the request. A request to the provided URI is executed, but the response is not stored in Parse Server's file storage as the server crashes upon receiving the response. ### Patches The feature has been implemented in Parse Server 4.2.0 but never worked and reliably crashes the server when trying to use it due to a bug in its implementation. Since the feature is not currently working, and due to its risky nature, it has been removed to address the vulnerability. ### Workarounds None.