#vulnerability

A vulnerability was detected in sequa-ai sequa-mcp up to 1.0.13. This affects the function redirectToAuthorization of the file src/helpers/node-oauth-client-provider.ts of the component OAuth Server Discovery. Performing manipulation results in os command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 1.0.14 is able to mitigate this issue. The patch is named e569815854166db5f71c2e722408f8957fb9e804. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The vendor explains: "We only promote that mcp server with our own URLs that have a valid response, but yes if someone would use it with a non sequa url, this is a valid attack vector. We have released a new version (1.0.14) that fixes this and validates that only URLs can be opened."

npm parcel 2.0.0-alpha and before has an Origin Validation Error vulnerability. Malicious websites can send XMLHTTPRequests to the application's development server and read the response to steal source code when developers visit them.

Pingora deployments that include HTTP/2 server support may be affected by the vulnerability described in CVE-2025-8671. Under certain conditions, Pingora applications may allocate buffers before the HTTP/2 reset and resulting stream cancellation is processed by the server. Repeated resets can force excessive memory consumption and lead to denial-of-service. **Impact**: On affected versions, malicious clients could trigger unusually high memory consumption, which may result in service instability or process termination. **Credits**: Reported responsibly by security researcher [Gal Bar Nahum](https://github.com/galbarnahum) (@[galbarnahum](https://github.com/galbarnahum)) **Mitigation**: This issue is addressed by ensuring Pingora uses patched versions of HTTP/2 dependencies that include reset-handling safeguards to release connection resources before excessive memory buildup. Users should upgrade to the latest Pingora release, which incorporates the required fixes. - Users are reques...

### Summary A client-side path traversal vulnerability in Nuxt's Island payload revival mechanism allowed attackers to manipulate client-side requests to different endpoints within the same application domain when specific prerendering conditions are met. ### Technical Details The vulnerability occurs in the client-side payload revival process (revive-payload.client.ts) where Nuxt Islands are automatically fetched when encountering serialized `__nuxt_island` objects. The issue affects the following flow: 1. During prerendering, if an API endpoint returns user-controlled data containing a crafted `__nuxt_island` object 2. This data gets serialized with `devalue.stringify` and stored in the prerendered page 3. When a client navigates to the prerendered page, `devalue.parse` deserializes the payload 4. The Island reviver attempts to fetch `/__nuxt_island/${key}.json` where `key` could contain path traversal sequences ### Prerequisites for Exploitation This vulnerability requires **a...

Special characters used during e-mail registration may perform SMTP Injection and unexpectedly send short unwanted e-mails. The email is limited to 64 characters (limited local part of the email), so the attack is limited to very shorts emails (subject and little data, the example is 60 chars). This flaw's only direct consequence is an unsolicited email being sent from the Keycloak server. However, this action could be a precursor for more sophisticated attacks.

### Impact The code in the scheduler for downloading a tiny file is hard coded to use the HTTP protocol, rather than HTTPS. This means that an attacker could perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack, changing the network request so that a different piece of data gets downloaded. Due to the use of weak integrity checks (TOB-DF2-15), this modification of the data may go unnoticed. ```golang // DownloadTinyFile downloads tiny file from peer without range. func (p *Peer) DownloadTinyFile() ([]byte, error) { ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), downloadTinyFileContextTimeout) defer cancel() // Download url: http://${host}:${port}/download/${taskIndex}/${taskID}?peerId=${peerID} targetURL := url.URL{ Scheme: } "http", fmt.Sprintf("%s:%d", p.Host.IP, p.Host.DownloadPort), fmt.Sprintf("download/%s/%s", p.Task.ID[:3], p.Task.ID), Host: Path: RawQuery: fmt.Sprintf("peerId=%s", p.ID), ``` A network-level attacker who cannot join a peer-to-peer network p...

### Impact The access control mechanism for the Proxy feature uses simple string comparisons and is therefore vulnerable to timing attacks. An attacker may try to guess the password one character at a time by sending all possible characters to a vulnerable mechanism and measuring the comparison instruction’s execution times. The vulnerability is shown in figure 8.1, where both the username and password are compared with a short-circuiting equality operation. ```golang if user != proxy.basicAuth.Username || pass != proxy.basicAuth.Password { ``` It is currently undetermined what an attacker may be able to do with access to the proxy password. ### Patches - Dragonfy v2.1.0 and above. ### Workarounds There are no effective workarounds, beyond upgrading. ### References A third party security audit was performed by Trail of Bits, you can see the [full report](https://github.com/dragonflyoss/dragonfly/blob/main/docs/security/dragonfly-comprehensive-report-2023.pdf). If you have any ...

### Impact There are multiple server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in the DragonFly2 system. The vulnerabilities enable users to force DragonFly2’s components to make requests to internal services, which otherwise are not accessible to the users. One SSRF attack vector is exposed by the Manager’s API. The API allows users to create jobs. When creating a Preheat type of a job, users provide a URL that the Manager connects to (see figures 2.1–2.3). The URL is weakly validated, and so users can trick the Manager into sending HTTP requests to services that are in the Manager’s local network. ```golang func (p *preheat) CreatePreheat(ctx context.Context, schedulers []models.Scheduler, json types.PreheatArgs) (*internaljob.GroupJobState, error) { [skipped] url := json.URL [skipped] // Generate download files var files []internaljob.PreheatRequest switch PreheatType(json.Type) { case PreheatImageType: // Parse image manifest url s...

## Summary A Local File Inclusion (LFI) issue was identified in the esm.sh service URL handling. An attacker could craft a request that causes the server to read and return files from the host filesystem (or other unintended file sources). **Severity:** High — LFI can expose secrets, configuration files, credentials, or enable further compromise. **Impact:** reading configuration files, private keys, environment files, or other sensitive files; disclosure of secrets or credentials; information leakage that could enable further attacks. Vulnerable code snippet is in this file: https://github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh/blob/c62f191d32639314ff0525d1c3c0e19ea2b16143/server/router.go#L1168 --- ## Proof of Concept 1. Using this default config file that I copy from the repo, the server is running at `http://localhost:9999` with this command `go run server/esmd/main.go --config=config.json` ```json { "port": 9999, "npmRegistry": "https://registry.npmjs.org/", "npmToken": "******" } ```...

### Impact The REXML gems from 3.3.3 to 3.4.1 have a DoS vulnerability when parsing XML containing multiple XML declarations. If you need to parse untrusted XMLs, you may be impacted to these vulnerabilities. ### Patches REXML gems 3.4.2 or later include the patches to fix these vulnerabilities. ### Workarounds Don't parse untrusted XMLs. ### References * https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2025/09/18/dos-rexml-cve-2025-58767/ : An announcement on www.ruby-lang.org