#web

Using `serde_yml::ser::Serializer.emitter` can cause a segmentation fault, which is unsound. The GitHub project for `serde_yml` was archived after unsoundness issues were raised. If you rely on this crate, it is highly recommended switching to a maintained alternative. ## Recommended alternatives - [`serde_norway`](https://crates.io/crates/serde_norway) - Maintained fork of `serde_yaml`, using `unsafe-libyaml-norway` - [`serde_yaml_ng`](https://crates.io/crates/serde_yaml_ng) - Maintained fork of `serde_yaml`, using unmaintained `unsafe-libyaml` ## Incomplete pure Rust alternatives These implementation do not rely on C `libyaml`. - [`serde_yaml2`](https://crates.io/crates/serde_yaml2) - [`yaml-peg`](https://crates.io/crates/yaml-peg)

In version 0.0.4, `libyml::string::yaml_string_extend` was revised resulting in undefined behaviour, which is unsound. The GitHub project for `libyml` was archived after unsoundness issues were raised. If you rely on this crate, it is highly recommended switching to a maintained alternative. ## Recommended alternatives - [`libyaml-safer`](https://crates.io/crates/libyaml-safer) - [`unsafe-libyaml-norway`](https://crates.io/crates/unsafe-libyaml-norway) - Maintained fork of `unsafe-libyaml`

The public accessible struct SyncVec has a public safe method get_unchecked. It accept a parameter index and used in the get_unchecked without sufficient checks as mentioned [here](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.slice.html#method.get_unchecked).

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions allows remote authenticated attackers with the instance administrator role to inject arbitrary web script or HTML into all pages via a crafted payload injected into the Instance Configuration's (1) CDN Host HTTP text field or (2) CDN Host HTTPS text field.

New research from Red Canary and Zscaler shows phishing lures now drop RMM tools like ITarian and Atera,…

Attacks that target users in their web browsers have seen an unprecedented rise in recent years. In this article, we’ll explore what a “browser-based attack” is, and why they’re proving to be so effective.  What is a browser-based attack? First, it’s important to establish what a browser-based attack is. In most scenarios, attackers don’t think of themselves as attacking your web browser.

In a world where threats are persistent, the modern CISO’s real job isn't just to secure technology—it's to preserve institutional trust and ensure business continuity. This week, we saw a clear pattern: adversaries are targeting the complex relationships that hold businesses together, from supply chains to strategic partnerships. With new regulations and the rise of AI-driven attacks, the

A new artificial intelligence (AI)-powered penetration testing tool linked to a China-based company has attracted nearly 11,000 downloads on the Python Package Index (PyPI) repository, raising concerns that it could be repurposed by cybercriminals for malicious purposes. Dubbed Villager, the framework is assessed to be the work of Cyberspike, which has positioned the tools as a red teaming

A list of topics we covered in the week of September 8 to September 14 of 2025

Chinese-speaking users are the target of a search engine optimization (SEO) poisoning campaign that uses fake software sites to distribute malware. "The attackers manipulated search rankings with SEO plugins and registered lookalike domains that closely mimicked legitimate software sites," Fortinet FortiGuard Labs researcher Pei Han Liao said. "By using convincing language and small character