Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Source

ghsa

GHSA-772m-43f3-hmf8: TYPO3 Broken Access Control in Localization Handling

It has been discovered that backend users having limited access to specific languages are capable of modifying and creating pages in the default language which actually should be disallowed. A valid backend user account is needed in order to exploit this vulnerability.

ghsa
#vulnerability#git
GHSA-g7hw-jh4p-75wr: TYPO3 Cross-Site Scripting in Filelist Module

It has been discovered that the output table listing in the “Files” backend module is vulnerable to cross-site scripting when a file extension contains malicious sequences. Access to the file system of the server - either directly or through synchronization - is required to exploit the vulnerability.

GHSA-85ch-44w7-rf32: TYPO3 Cross-Site Scripting in Fluid ViewHelpers

Failing to properly encode user input, templates using built-in Fluid ViewHelpers are vulnerable to cross-site scripting.

GHSA-hh95-5xm5-v8v7: TYPO3 CMS Possible Insecure Deserialization in Extbase Request Handling

It has been discovered that request handling in Extbase can be vulnerable to insecure deserialization. User submitted payload has to be signed with a corresponding HMAC-SHA1 using the sensitive TYPO3 encryptionKey as secret - invalid or unsigned payload is not deserialized. However, since sensitive information could have been leaked by accident (e.g. in repositories or in commonly known and unprotected backup files), there is the possibility that attackers know the private encryptionKey and are able to calculate the required HMAC-SHA1 to allow a malicious payload to be deserialized. Requirements for successfully exploiting this vulnerability (all of the following): - rendering at least one Extbase plugin in the frontend - encryptionKey has been leaked (from LocalConfiguration.php or corresponding .env file)

GHSA-92wp-jghr-hh87: Weak encryption in Ninja Core

The encrypt() function of Ninja Core v7.0.0 was discovered to use a weak cryptographic algorithm, leading to a possible leakage of sensitive information.

GHSA-wjmj-h3xc-hxp8: Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information in zsa

### Impact All users are impacted. The zsa application transfers the parse error stack from the server to the client in production build mode. This can potentially reveal sensitive information about the server environment, such as the machine username and directory paths. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to sensitive server information. This information could be used to plan further attacks or gain a deeper understanding of the server infrastructure. ### Patches Yes, this has been pathed on `0.3.3` ### Workarounds No way to fix other than the patch.

GHSA-w235-7p84-xx57: Tornado has a CRLF injection in CurlAsyncHTTPClient headers

### Summary Tornado’s `curl_httpclient.CurlAsyncHTTPClient` class is vulnerable to CRLF (carriage return/line feed) injection in the request headers. ### Details When an HTTP request is sent using `CurlAsyncHTTPClient`, Tornado does not reject carriage return (\r) or line feed (\n) characters in the request headers. As a result, if an application includes an attacker-controlled header value in a request sent using `CurlAsyncHTTPClient`, the attacker can inject arbitrary headers into the request or cause the application to send arbitrary requests to the specified server. This behavior differs from that of the standard `AsyncHTTPClient` class, which does reject CRLF characters. This issue appears to stem from libcurl's (as well as pycurl's) lack of validation for the [`HTTPHEADER`](https://curl.se/libcurl/c/CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER.html) option. libcurl’s documentation states: > The headers included in the linked list must not be CRLF-terminated, because libcurl adds CRLF after each header...

GHSA-753j-mpmx-qq6g: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') in tornado

### Summary When Tornado receives a request with two `Transfer-Encoding: chunked` headers, it ignores them both. This enables request smuggling when Tornado is deployed behind a proxy server that emits such requests. [Pound](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_(networking)) does this. ### PoC 0. Install Tornado. 1. Start a simple Tornado server that echoes each received request's body: ```bash cat << EOF > server.py import asyncio import tornado class MainHandler(tornado.web.RequestHandler): def post(self): self.write(self.request.body) async def main(): tornado.web.Application([(r"/", MainHandler)]).listen(8000) await asyncio.Event().wait() asyncio.run(main()) EOF python3 server.py & ``` 2. Send a valid chunked request: ```bash printf 'POST / HTTP/1.1\r\nTransfer-Encoding: chunked\r\n\r\n1\r\nZ\r\n0\r\n\r\n' | nc localhost 8000 ``` 3. Observe that the response is as expected: ``` HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: TornadoServer/6.3.3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8...

GHSA-rrvc-c7xg-7cf3: TokenController formName not sanitized in hidden input

### Impact TokenController get parameter formName not sanitized in returned input field leads to XSS. _What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_ ### Patches _Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_ ### Workarounds _Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_ Create a custom Symfony Request listener which checks for the get value of `form` for the TokenController and if not valid stop the request dispatching and return a error status code. ### References _Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_

GHSA-h6m6-jj8v-94jj: SQL injection in litellm

An SQL Injection vulnerability exists in the berriai/litellm repository, specifically within the `/global/spend/logs` endpoint. The vulnerability arises due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command. The affected code constructs an SQL query by concatenating an unvalidated `api_key` parameter directly into the query, making it susceptible to SQL Injection if the `api_key` contains malicious data. This issue affects the latest version of the repository. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access, data manipulation, exposure of confidential information, and denial of service (DoS).