In this week’s newsletter, Thor inspects the LockBit leak, finding $10,000 “security tips,” ransom negotiations gone wrong and a rare glimpse into the human side of cybercrime.

Thursday, May 15, 2025 14:01

Welcome to this week’s edition of the Threat Source newsletter. 

I haven’t been to Prague in a while, which is a pity. It’s a wonderful city — great people, amazing food. I’ve visited customers there, held team meetings at the local office (shoutout to Petr!) and spent some memorable summer days off. But none of those are why I’m sending my greetings this time. 

Last week, anyone trying to access LockBit’s dark web affiliate panels was greeted by a defaced page with the message: 

> "Don't do crime CRIME IS BAD xoxo from Prague” 

Alongside the message was a download link for a compressed archive called “paneldb\_dump.zip” —  a 7.5MB file that extracts to a 26MB clear-text SQL dump containing 20 tables. The breach exposed a rare, unfiltered look into LockBit’s operations. 

While most articles focused on the nearly 60,000 Bitcoin addresses or the credentials for 75 admins and affiliates (all with plaintext passwords), I have to admit that I was mesmerized by the “chats” table. 4,423 messages distributed across 208 victims, spanning from Dec. 2024 to April 2025, these chats reveal the raw tactics, ransom demands and negotiation strategies of both affiliates and victims. Sometimes there was just a single unanswered message; in other cases, over 300 messages included “technical support” for unrecoverable files, and even requests for refunds.  

Ransom demands varied widely, from just a few thousand dollars to as much as $2 million in one notable case. There were also several instances of confusion — some mistakenly thought the demand was "100,000 bitcoins" when it was actually "100,000 dollars in bitcoin.” Additionally, there was a case involving a hosting company breach, where it was the company’s customers who ultimately suffered the consequences. The chat exposed that LockBit encrypted all the data with the same key; even though not all victims were willing or able to pay the ransom, LockBit insisted the hoster pay the full amount, making it difficult to collect the asked ransom. 

Negotiations were often pressured by tight deadlines, but European bank holidays on Good Friday, Easter Monday and May 1st further complicated the situation. Multiple times there were situations where the ransom demand increased after a specific deadline. I even found messages from victims asking for more time so they could gather funds in smaller amounts to avoid detection under local anti-money laundering laws. 

In another chat, a victim tried to negotiate by pleading inability to pay a $100k ransom, only to be told, “Seven directors at 14k can’t chime in?” This clearly shows that the “Analytics Department” of LockBit did their homework. 

The level of “trust” placed in affiliates was also striking. Messages included:

Interestingly, that last service was offered for an extra fee. Let me share some of their $10,000 “tips” for free:

With these $10,000 tips, I personally think it would be better to get advice before an incident from Talos Incident Response. They can also provide guidance and proactive support as part of the Talos IR Retainer.

The LockBit leak is a rare window into the mechanics of cybercrime and the human stories behind the headlines. And, for now, xoxo to Prague.

**The one big thing **

Cisco Talos has observed a growing trend of attack kill chains being split into two stages — initial compromise and subsequent exploitation — executed by separate threat actors. In response to these evolving threats, we have refined the definitions of initial access brokers (IABs) to include subcategories such as financially-motivated initial access (FIA), state-sponsored initial access (SIA), and opportunistic initial access (OIA).   

**Why do I care? **

This trend complicates traditional threat modeling and actor profiling, as it requires understanding the intricate relationships and interactions between various groups. For example, hunting and containment strategies that may defend against one type of IAB may not be suitable for another. 

**So now what? **

We have identified several methods for analyzing compartmentalized attacks and propose an extended Diamond Model, which adds a “Relationship Layer” to enrich the context of the relationships between the four features. Familiarize yourself with the new taxonomy we propose, and incorporate this new methodology for modeling and tracking compartmentalized threats into your toolkit. 

**Top security headlines of the week **

**Operation Moonlander**    
A criminal proxy network that has been around for more than 20 years and was built on thousands of infected IOT and end-of-life (EoL) devices was dismantled in an international operation. (U.S. Attorney’s Office) 

**Supply Chain Compromise**    
A deprecated node.js package with more than 40k downloads per week, ‘rand-user-agent' has been compromised with a malicious payload dubbed “RATatouille”. This is a clear case of a supply chain attack. (Aikido) 

**Ascension Health Data Breach Impacts Over 430,000**   
Healthcare provider Ascension has disclosed a data breach affecting over 430,000 patients.  (Bleeping Computer) 

**Germany Shuts Down eXch Over $1.9B Laundering**   
German authorities have shut down the cryptocurrency mixer eXch due to its alleged involvement in laundering approximately $1.9 billion in illicit funds, seizing a large amount of cryptocurrency and data. (BKA, German language)

**Can’t get enough Talos? **

**Talos Takes**  
Follow the motive: Rethinking defense against Initial Access Groups. Listen here.

**Talos in the news**  
Initial Access Brokers Target Brazil Execs via NF-e Spam and Legit RMM Trials (The Hacker News) 

Why MFA is getting easier to bypass and what to do about it (Ars Tecnnica)

**Upcoming events where you can find Talos **

*   Cisco Connect UK & Ireland (May 20) London, UK  
*   BotConf (May 20 – 23) Angers, France  
*   Cisco Live U.S. (June 8 – 12) San Diego, CA

**Most prevalent malware files from Talos telemetry over the past week  **

**SHA 256: e00aa8146cf1202d8ba4fffbcf86da3c6d8148a80bb6503d89b0db2aa9cc0997**   
MD5: eae884415e5fd403e4f1bf46f90df0be   
VirusTotal: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/e00aa8146cf1202d8ba4fffbcf86da3c6d8148a80bb6503d89b0db2aa9cc0997    
Typical Filename: paneldb\_dump.zip 

**SHA 256: 9f1f11a708d393e0a4109ae189bc64f1f3e312653dcf317a2bd406f18ffcc507**   
MD5: 2915b3f8b703eb744fc54c81f4a9c67f   
VirusTotal: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/9f1f11a708d393e0a4109ae189bc64f1f3e312653dcf317a2bd406f18ffcc507   
Typical Filename: VID001.exe   
Claimed Product: N/A   
Detection Name: Win.Worm.Coinminer::1201 

**SHA 256: a31f222fc283227f5e7988d1ad9c0aecd66d58bb7b4d8518ae23e110308dbf91**   
MD5: 7bdbd180c081fa63ca94f9c22c457376   
VirusTotal: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/a31f222fc283227f5e7988d1ad9c0aecd66d58bb7b4d8518ae23e110308dbf91    
Typical Filename: c0dwjdi6a.dll   
Claimed Product: N/A   
Detection Name: Trojan.GenericKD.33515991

Xoxo to Prague

Microsoft has released its monthly security update for May of 2025 which includes 78 vulnerabilities affecting a range of products, including 11 that Microsoft marked as “critical”.  
Microsoft noted five vulnerabilities that have been observed to be exploited in the wild. CVE-2025-30397 is a remote code

Tuesday, May 13, 2025 16:38

Microsoft has released its monthly security update for May of 2025 which includes 78 vulnerabilities affecting a range of products, including 11 that Microsoft marked as “critical”.  

Microsoft noted five vulnerabilities that have been observed to be exploited in the wild. CVE-2025-30397 is a remote code execution vulnerability in the Microsoft Scripting Engine. There were also four elevation of privilege vulnerabilities being actively exploited, CVE-2025-32709, CVE-2025-30400, CVE-2025-32701 and CVE-2025-32706 affecting the Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock, the DWM Core Library and the Windows Common Log File System Driver.  

The eleven "critical” entries consist of five remote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities, four elevation of privilege vulnerabilities, one information disclosure vulnerability and one spoofing vulnerability. Three of the critical vulnerabilities have been marked as "Exploitation more likely": CVE-2025-30386 --a Microsoft Office RCE vulnerability, CVE-2025-30390 --an Azure ML Compute elevation of privilege vulnerability, and CVE-2025-30398 – a Nuance PowerScribe 360 information disclosure vulnerability.  

The most notable of the “critical” vulnerabilities listed affect Microsoft Office. CVE-2025-30386 is a RCE vulnerability with base CVSS 3.1 score of 8.3. To successfully exploit CVE-2025-30386, an attacker could send a victim an email, and without the victim clicking the link, viewing or interacting with the email, trigger a use-after-free scenario, allowing arbitrary code to be executed. Microsoft has assessed that the attack complexity is “Low”, and exploitation is “More likely”. Another RCE vulnerability affecting Microsoft Office, CVE-2025-30377, has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.4, and has been assessed an attack complexity of “Low”, but exploitation is considered “Less Likely”. 

Two RCE vulnerabilities affect the Remote Desktop Client. CVE-2025-29966 and CVE-2025-29967 are both Heap-cased Buffer Overflow vulnerabilities with CVSS 3.1 base scores of 8.8 with “Low” attack complexity and exploitation “Less Likely”. An attacker controlling a Remote Desktop Server could trigger the buffer overflow in a vulnerable when a vulnerable Remote Desktop Client connects to the server. 

CVE-2025-29833 is a RCE affecting the Virtual Machine Bus. This is a Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition which has been assessed an attack complexity of “High” and exploitation is “Less Likely”. 

Talos would also like to highlight the following "important" vulnerabilities as Microsoft has determined that exploitation is "More likely": 

*   CVE-2025-24063 - Kernel Streaming Service Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 
*   CVE-2025-29841 - Universal Print Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 
*   CVE-2025-29971 - Web Threat Defense (WTD.sys) Denial of Service Vulnerability 
*   CVE-2025-29976 - Microsoft SharePoint Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 
*   CVE-2025-30382 - Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability 
*   CVE-2025-30385 - Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability 
*   CVE-2025-30388 - Windows Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

  
A complete list of all the other vulnerabilities Microsoft disclosed this month is available on its update page.  

In response to these vulnerability disclosures, Talos is releasing a new Snort rule set that detects attempts to exploit some of them. Please note that additional rules may be released at a future date and current rules are subject to change pending additional information. Cisco Security Firewall customers should use the latest update to their ruleset by updating their SRU. Open-source Snort Subscriber Rule Set customers can stay up to date by downloading the latest rule pack available for purchase on Snort.org. 

The rules included in this release that protect against the exploitation of many of these vulnerabilities are 64848-64867. There are also these Snort 3 rules: 64852-64853, 301192-301200, and 301203

Microsoft Patch Tuesday for May 2025 — Snort rules and prominent vulnerabilities

How do you profile actors and defend your systems when multiple threat actors are working together? In Part 2, Cisco Talos proposes an extended Diamond Model to analyze complex relationships between attackers.

Defining a new methodology for modeling and tracking compartmentalized threats

Threat actors are teaming up, splitting attacks into stages and making defense harder than ever. In Part 1, Cisco Talos examines their tactics and defines their motivations.

Redefining IABs: Impacts of compartmentalization on threat tracking and modeling

How do attackers exploit authority bias to manipulate victims? Martin shares proactive strategies to protect yourself and others in this must-read edition of the Threat Source newsletter.

Thursday, May 8, 2025 14:01

Welcome to this week’s edition of the Threat Source newsletter. 

Authority bias is one of the many things that shape how we think. Taking the advice of someone with recognized authority is often far easier (and usually leads to a better outcome) than spending time and effort in researching the reasoning and logic behind that advice. Put simply, it’s easier to take your doctor’s advice on health matters than it is to spend years in medical school learning why the advice you received is necessary. 

This tendency to respect and follow authoritative instructions translates into our use of computers, too. If you’re reading this, you’ve likely been the recipient of many questions about computer-related matters from friends and family. However, your trust can be abused, even by someone who seems knowledgeable and respectable. 

Attackers have learned that by impersonating individuals with some form of authority, such as banking staff, tax officials or IT professionals, they can persuade victims to carry out actions against their own interests. In our most recent Incident Response Quarterly Trends update, we describe how ransomware actors masquerade as IT agents when contacting their victims, instructing them to install remote access software. This allows the threat actor to set up long-term access to the device and continue the pursuit of their malicious objectives. 

If someone contacts you out of the blue professing to be an IT or bank/tax expert with urgent or helpful instructions, end the conversation immediately. Follow up with a call to the main contact details of the team or organization that contacted you to verify if the call was genuine. Be aware of the scams that the bad guys are using and spread awareness far and wide. Expect threat actors to attempt to exploit human nature and its own vulnerabilities. 

**The one big thing **

Threat hunting is an integral part of any cyber security strategy because identifying potential incursions early allows issues to be swiftly resolved before harm is incurred. There are many different approaches to threat hunting, each of which may uncover different threats.

**Why do I care? **

As threat actors increasingly use living-off-the-land binaries (LOLBins) — i.e. using either dual-use tools or the tools that they find already in place on compromised systems — detecting the presence of an intruder is no longer a case of simply finding their malware.  

Spotting bad guys is still possible, but requires a slightly different approach: either looking for evidence of the potential techniques they use, or finding evidence that things aren’t quite as they should be. 

**So now what? **

Read about the different types of threat hunting strategies the Talos IR team uses and investigate how these can be used within your environment to improve your chances of finding incursions early.

**Top security headlines of the week **

**MySQL turns 30**    
The popular database was founded on May 23, 1995 and is at the heart of many high-traffic applications such as Facebook, Netflix, Uber, Airbnb, Shopify, and Booking.com. (Oracle) 

**Disney Slack attack wasn't Russian protesters, just a Cali dude with malware**   
A resident of California has pleaded guilty to conducting an attack in which 1.1 TB of data was stolen. The attack was conducted by releasing a trojan masquerading as an AI art generation application. (The Register) 

**Ransomware Group Claims Attacks on UK Retailers**   
The DragonForce ransomware group says it orchestrated the disruptive cyberattacks that hit UK retailers Co-op, Harrods, and Marks & Spencer (M&S). (Security Week) 

**Attackers Ramp Up Efforts Targeting Developer Secrets**   
Attackers are increasingly seeking to steal secret keys or tokens that have been inadvertently exposed in live environments or published in online code repositories. (Dark Reading)

**Can’t get enough Talos? **

**Spam campaign targeting Brazil abuses Remote Monitoring and Management tools**   
A new spam campaign is targeting Brazilian users with a clever twist — abusing the free trial period of trusted remote monitoring tools and the country’s electronic invoice system to spread malicious agents. **Read now**

**Threat Hunting with Talos IR**  
Talos recently published a **blog** on the framework behind our Threat Hunting service, featuring this handy video:

**Upcoming events where you can find Talos **

*   CTA TIPS 2025 (May 14 – 15)  Arlington, VA  
*   Cisco Connect UK & Ireland (May 20) London, UK  
*   BotConf (May 20 – 23) Angers, France  
*   Cisco Live U.S. (June 8 – 12) San Diego, CA 

**Most prevalent malware files from Talos telemetry over the past week **

**SHA256: 9f1f11a708d393e0a4109ae189bc64f1f3e312653dcf317a2bd406f18ffcc507**     
MD5: 2915b3f8b703eb744fc54c81f4a9c67f     
VirusTotal: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/9f1f11a708d393e0a4109ae189bc64f1f3e312653dcf317a2bd406f18ffcc507/    
Typical Filename: VID001.exe    
Detection Name: Win.Worm.Bitmin-9847045-0  

**SHA256: a31f222fc283227f5e7988d1ad9c0aecd66d58bb7b4d8518ae23e110308dbf91**     
MD5: 7bdbd180c081fa63ca94f9c22c457376     
VirusTotal: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/a31f222fc283227f5e7988d1ad9c0aecd66d58bb7b4d8518ae23e110308dbf91     
Typical Filename: img001.exe    
Detection Name: Simple\_Custom\_Detection  

**SHA256: 47ecaab5cd6b26fe18d9759a9392bce81ba379817c53a3a468fe9060a076f8ca**     
MD5: 71fea034b422e4a17ebb06022532fdde     
VirusTotal: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/a31f222fc283227f5e7988d1ad9c0aecd66d58bb7b4d8518ae23e110308dbf91     
Typical Filename: VID001.exe     
Detection Name: Coinminer:MBT.26mw.in14.Talos 

**SHA256: c67b03c0a91eaefffd2f2c79b5c26a2648b8d3c19a22cadf35453455ff08ead0**     
MD5: 8c69830a50fb85d8a794fa46643493b2   
VirusTotal: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/c67b03c0a91eaefffd2f2c79b5c26a2648b8d3c19a22cadf35453455ff08ead0    
Typical Filename: AAct.exe   
Detection Name: W32.File.MalParent

The IT help desk kindly requests you read this newsletter

A new spam campaign is targeting Brazilian users with a clever twist — abusing the free trial period of trusted remote monitoring tools and the country’s electronic invoice system to spread malicious agents.

*   Cisco Talos identified a spam campaign targeting Brazilian users with commercial remote monitoring and management (RMM) tools since at least January 2025. Talos observed the use of PDQ Connect and N-able remote access tools in this campaign. 
*   The spam message uses the Brazilian electronic invoice system, NF-e, as a lure to entice users into clicking hyperlinks and accessing malicious content hosted in Dropbox. 
*   Talos has observed the threat actor abusing RMM tools in order to create and distribute malicious agents to victims. They then use the remote capabilities of these agents to download and install Screen Connect after the initial compromise.
*   Talos assesses with high confidence that the threat actor is an initial access broker (IAB) abusing the free trial periods of these RMM tools. 

Talos recently observed a spam campaign targeting Portuguese-speaking users in Brazil with the intention of installing commercial remote monitoring and management (RMM) tools. The initial infection occurs via specially crafted spam messages purporting to be from financial institutions or cell phone carriers with an overdue bill or electronic receipt of payment issued as an NF-e (see Figures 1 and 2). 

Figure 1. Spam message purporting to be from a cell phone provider. 

Figure 2. Spam message masquerading as a bill from a financial institution. 

Both messages link to a Dropbox file, which contains the malicious binary installer for the RMM tool. The file names also contain references to NF-e in their names: 

*   AGENT\_NFe\_<random>.exe 
*   Boleto\_NFe\_<random>.exe 
*   Eletronica\_NFe\_<random>.exe 
*   Nf-e<random>.exe 
*   NFE\_<random>.exe 
*   NOTA\_FISCAL\_NFe\_<random>.exe 

_Note: <random> means the filename uses a random sequence of letters and numbers in that position._ 

The victims targeted in this campaign are mostly C-level executives and financial and human resources accounts across several industries, including some educational and government institutions. This assessment is based on the most common recipients found in the messages Talos observed during this campaign. 

Figure 3. Targeted recipients.

This campaign's objective is to lure the victims into installing an RMM tool, which allows the threat actor to take complete control of the target machine. N-able RMM Remote Access is the most common tool distributed in this campaign and is developed by N-able, Inc., previously known as SolarWinds. N-able is aware of this abuse and took action to disable the affected trial accounts. Another tool Talos observed in some cases is PDQ Connect, a similar RMM application. Both provide a 15-day free trial period.

To assess whether these actors were using a trial version rather than stolen credentials to create these accounts, Talos checked samples older than 15 days and confirmed all of them returned errors that the accounts were disabled, while newer samples found in the last 15 days were all active.

Talos also examined the email accounts used to register for the service. They all use free email services such as Gmail or Proton Mail, as well as usernames following the theme of the spam campaign, with few exceptions where the threat actors used personal accounts. These exceptions are potentially compromised accounts which are being abused by the threat actors to create additional trial accounts. Talos did not find any samples in which the registered account was issued by a private company, so we can assess with high confidence these agents were created using trial accounts instead of stolen credentials.

_N-able is aware of this abuse and took action to disable the affected trial accounts._

Talos found no evidence of a common post-infection behavior for the affected machines, with most machines staying infected for days before any other malicious activity was executed by the tool. However, in some cases, we observed the threat actor installing an additional RMM tool and removing all security tools from the machine a few days after the initial compromise. This is consistent with actions of initial access broker (IAB) groups. 

An IAB's main objective is to rapidly create a network of compromised machines and then sell access to the network to third parties. Threat actors commonly use IABs when looking for specific target companies to deploy ransomware on. However, IABs have varied priorities and may sell their services to any threat actors, including state-sponsored actors.  

Adversaries’ abuse of commercial RMM tools has steadily increased in recent years. These tools are of interest to threat actors because they are usually digitally signed by recognized entities and are a fully featured backdoor. They also have little to no cost in software or infrastructure, as all of this is generally provided by the trial version application.  

Talos created a trial account to test what features were available for a trial user. In the case of the N-able remote access tool, the trial version offers a full set of features only limited by the 15-day trial period. Talos was able to confirm that by using a trial account, the threat actor has full access to the machine, including remote desktop like access, remote command execution, screen streaming, keystroke capture and remote shell access. 

Figure 4. N-able management interface showing available remote access tools. 

Figure 5. Administrative shell executed on a remote machine. 

The threat actor also has access to a fully featured file manager to easily read and write files to the remote file system. 

Figure 6. N-able file manager. 

The network traffic these tools create is also disguised as regular traffic, with many tools using communication over HTTPS and connecting to resources which are part of the infrastructure provided by the application provider. For example, N-able Remote Access uses a domain associated with its management interface, hosted on Amazon Web Services (AWS): 

*   hxxps://upload1\[.\]am\[.\]remote\[.\]management/ 
*   hxxps://upload2\[.\]am\[.\]remote\[.\]management/ 
*   hxxps://upload3\[.\]am\[.\]remote\[.\]management/ 
*   hxxps://upload4\[.\]am\[.\]remote\[.\]management/ 

_**Disclaimer**: The URLs above are part of the management infrastructure for the RMM tools described in this blog and are not controlled by the threat actor. Customers must complete an assessment before enabling block signatures for these domains._ 

The domain the agent uses is the same for any customer using the tool, with only the username and API key differentiating which customer the agent belongs to, as can be seen in Figure 7. This makes it even more difficult to identify the origin of the attacks and perform threat actor attribution.

Figure 7. Example configuration file. 

By extracting the configuration files inside the agent installer files still available on Dropbox, we can see some email addresses follow the same theme of the spam emails, using names of finance-related users and domains, while others could be potentially compromised accounts being used to create trial accounts for N-able Remote Access.  

With these trial versions being limited only by time and providing full remote-control features with little to no cost to the threat actors, Talos expects these tools to become even more common in attacks. 

Cisco Secure Firewall Application control is able to detect the unintended usage of RMM tools in customer's networks. Instructions on how to set up Application control can be found at Cisco Secure Firewall documentation. 

**Coverage **

Ways our customers can detect and block this threat are listed below. 

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly AMP for Endpoints) is ideally suited to prevent the execution of the malware detailed in this post. Try Secure Endpoint for free here. 

Cisco Secure Email (formerly Cisco Email Security) can block malicious emails sent by threat actors as part of their campaign. You can try Secure Email for free here. 

Cisco Secure Firewall (formerly Next-Generation Firewall and Firepower NGFW) appliances such as Threat Defense Virtual, Adaptive Security Appliance and Meraki MX can detect malicious activity associated with this threat. 

Cisco Secure Network/Cloud Analytics (Stealthwatch/Stealthwatch Cloud) analyzes network traffic automatically and alerts users of potentially unwanted activity on every connected device. 

Cisco Secure Malware Analytics (Threat Grid) identifies malicious binaries and builds protection into all Cisco Secure products. 

Cisco Secure Access is a modern cloud-delivered Security Service Edge (SSE) built on Zero Trust principles.  Secure Access provides seamless transparent and secure access to the internet, cloud services or private application no matter where your users work.  Please contact your Cisco account representative or authorized partner if you are interested in a free trial of Cisco Secure Access. 

Umbrella, Cisco’s secure internet gateway (SIG), blocks users from connecting to malicious domains, IPs and URLs, whether users are on or off the corporate network.  

Cisco Secure Web Appliance (formerly Web Security Appliance) automatically blocks potentially dangerous sites and tests suspicious sites before users access them.  

Additional protections with context to your specific environment and threat data are available from the Firewall Management Center. 

Cisco Duo provides multi-factor authentication for users to ensure only those authorized are accessing your network.  

Open-source Snort Subscriber Rule Set customers can stay up to date by downloading the latest rule pack available for purchase on Snort.org. 

ClamAV detections are also available for this threat:  

Txt.Backdoor.NableRemoteAccessConfig-10044370-0  
Txt.Backdoor.NableRemoteAccessConfig-10044371-0   
Txt.Backdoor.NableRemoteAccessConfig-10044372-0 

**Indicators of Compromise **

_**Disclaimer**: The URLs below are part of the management infrastructure for the RMM tools described in this blog and are not controlled by the threat actor. An assessment must be done by customers before enabling block signatures for these domains._ 

_IOCs for this threat can be found on our GitHub repository_ _here__._ 

**Network IOCs **

hxxps://upload1\[.\]am\[.\]remote\[.\]management/   
hxxps://upload2\[.\]am\[.\]remote\[.\]management/   
hxxps://upload3\[.\]am\[.\]remote\[.\]management/   
hxxps://upload4\[.\]am\[.\]remote\[.\]management/   
198\[.\]45\[.\]54\[.\]34\[.\]bc\[.\]googleusercontent\[.\]com 

**RMM Installer - Hashes **

03b5c76ad07987cfa3236eae5f8a5d42cef228dda22b392c40236872b512684e   
0759b628512b4eaabc6c3118012dd29f880e77d2af2feca01127a6fcf2fbbf10   
080e29e52a87d0e0e39eca5591d7185ff024367ddaded3e3fd26d3dbdb096a39   
0de612ea433676f12731da515cb16df0f98817b45b5ebc9bbf121d0b9e59c412   
1182b8e97daf59ad5abd1cb4b514436249dd4d36b4f3589b939d053f1de8fe23   
14c1cb13ffc67b222b42095a2e9ec9476f101e3a57246a1c33912d8fe3297878   
2850a346ecb7aebee3320ed7160f21a744e38f2d1a76c54f44c892ffc5c4ab77   
4787df4eea91d9ceb9e25d9eb7373d79a0df4a5320411d7435f9a6621da2fd6b   
51fa1d7b95831a6263bf260df8044f77812c68a9b720dad7379ae96200b065dd   
527a40f5f73aeb663c7186db6e8236eec6f61fa04923cde560ebcd107911c9ff   
57a90105ad2023b76e357cf42ba01c5ca696d80a82f87b54aea58c4e0db8d683   
63cde9758f9209f15ee4068b11419fead501731b12777169d89ebb34063467ea   
79b041cedef44253fdda8a66b54bdd450605f01bbb77ea87da31450a9b4d2b63   
a2c17f5c7acb05af81d4554e5080f5ed40b10e3988e96b4d05c4ee3e6237c31a   
b53f9c2802a0846fc805c03798b36391c444ab5ea88dc2b36bffc908edc1f589   
c484d3394b32e3c7544414774c717ebc0ce4d04ca75a00e93f4fb04b9b48ecef   
ca11eb7b9341b88da855a536b0741ed3155e80fc1ab60d89600b58a4b80d63a5   
d1efebcca578357ea7af582d3860fa6c357d203e483e6be3d6f9592265f3b41c   
e2171735f02f212c90856e9259ff7abc699c3efb55eeb5b61e72e92bea96f99c   
e34b8c9798b92f6a0e2ca9853adce299b1bf425dedb29f1266254ac3a15c87cd   
ebdefa6f88e459555844d3d9c13a4d7908c272128f65a12df4fb82f1aeab139f   
f52b4d81c73520fd25a2cc9c6e0e364b57396e0bb782187caf7c1e49693bebbf   
f5efd939372f869750e6f929026b7b5d046c5dad2f6bd703ff1b2089738b4d9c   
F68ae2c1d42d1b95e3829f08a516fb1695f75679fcfe0046e3e14890460191cf   
a71e274fc3086de4c22e68ed1a58567ab63790cc47cd2e04367e843408b9a065

Spam campaign targeting Brazil abuses Remote Monitoring and Management tools

Learn more about the framework Talos IR uses to conduct proactive threat hunts, and how we can help you stay one step ahead of emerging threats.

Tuesday, May 6, 2025 06:00

At Cisco Talos, we understand that effective cybersecurity isn’t just about responding to incidents — it’s about preventing them from happening in the first place. One of the most powerful ways we do this is through proactive threat hunting. Our Talos Incident Response (Talos IR) team works closely with organizations to not only address existing threats but to anticipate and mitigate potential future risks. A key component of our threat-hunting approach is the Splunk SURGe team’s PEAK Threat Hunting Framework, which enables us to conduct comprehensive and proactive hunts with precision.

**What is the PEAK Threat Hunting Framework?**

The PEAK Framework (Prepare, Execute, and Act with Knowledge) offers a structured methodology for conducting effective and focused threat hunts. It ensures that every hunt is aligned with an organization's specific needs and threat landscape. At the core of the PEAK framework are baseline hunts, which lay the foundation for proactive threat detection, alongside advanced techniques such as hypothesis-driven hunts and model-assisted threat hunts (M-ATH), which further enhance threat detection and mitigation.

**Baseline hunts: the foundation of proactive threat hunting**

Baseline hunts involve establishing a clear understanding of an organization’s normal operating environment in terms of user activity, network traffic and system processes. By documenting and analyzing this baseline, Talos IR can identify anomalous behavior that may signal malicious activity.

While these hunts can be a reactive measure, it's important to use them proactively to detect threats trying to blend in with regular operations, such as insider threats, advanced persistent threats (APTs) and even novel attack techniques that might otherwise go undetected.

The key steps in baseline hunts are:

1.  Defining Normal Activity: Understanding what “normal” looks like in your environment, using data from system logs, user behavior, and network traffic.
2.  Anomaly Detection: Proactively hunting for deviations from the baseline that could indicate potential threats.
3.  Refining the Baseline: Continuously improving and updating the baseline to account for emerging threats and changes in your infrastructure.

**Hypothesis-driven hunts: Testing assumptions about threats**

In addition to baseline hunts, Talos IR also uses hypothesis-driven hunts to proactively test assumptions about potential threats. These hunts are guided by specific hypotheses or educated guesses about what attackers might be doing in a given environment. Rather than relying on a static, one-size-fits-all approach without adjustments, hypothesis-driven hunts are dynamic, adapting to the specific questions and emerging threats that arise.

For example, a hypothesis-driven hunt might begin with the assumption that a particular group of users is being targeted by a phishing campaign. The hunt would focus on testing this assumption by looking for evidence of malicious emails, unusual login patterns or attempts to collect or exfiltrate data.

The key steps in hypothesis-driven hunts are:

1.  Forming Hypotheses: Based on threat intelligence and past incidents, teams generate specific hypotheses about possible attack vectors or adversary behaviors.
2.  Testing Hypotheses: Using data sources such as endpoint telemetry, authentication logs or network traffic, the hypothesis is tested to see if evidence supports the theory.
3.  Analyzing Results: If the hypothesis is validated, further investigation is done to understand the full scope of the potential threat.

**Model-assisted threat hunts: Leveraging machine learning to find hidden threats**

Another powerful tool in Talos IR’s proactive hunting approach is model-assisted threat hunts (M-ATHs). These hunts leverage machine learning and advanced statistical models to sift through vast amounts of data and identify patterns that may indicate hidden threats. M-ATHs allow our team to detect threats that would be difficult to find using traditional methods.

Machine learning models are trained to detect suspicious behavior across different domains — such as user activity, network traffic or system logs — by looking for deviations from typical patterns. Over time, as these models learn from new data and threat intelligence, they improve in their ability to detect emerging threats.

The key steps in M-ATHs are:

1.  Data Collection: Gathering large datasets from multiple sources, including network traffic, endpoint data, authentication logs, and more.
2.  Model Training: Using machine learning algorithms to identify patterns in normal and malicious behavior.
3.  Anomaly Detection: The trained model helps identify new, previously undetected anomalies or potential threats by looking for deviations from established patterns.
4.  Refinement: The model is refined as new data is collected and analyzed, improving its ability to detect subtle threats.

**Empowering threat hunts with Talos Threat Intelligence**

A crucial element that enriches and empowers every Talos IR threat hunt is Talos Threat Intelligence. By integrating up-to-date, high-fidelity threat intelligence into our hunts, we enhance the accuracy, relevance, and speed of our investigations. Talos Threat Intelligence provides a continuous stream of data on emerging threats, attack trends and adversary tactics, which helps us refine hypotheses, adjust baselines and improve our machine learning models.

This intelligence is not just a complement to our hunting process; it is embedded in every stage. It helps guide our hypothesis-driven hunts, sharpens our baseline detections and feeds into the models we use for anomaly detection. With Talos Threat Intelligence, we ensure that every hunt is aligned with the latest threat landscape, empowering your team with the knowledge needed to stay one step ahead of attackers.

**Proactive engagements for IR Retainer customers**

For Talos IR Retainer customers, baseline hunts, hypothesis-driven hunts, and model-assisted threat hunts provide a valuable layer of ongoing, proactive support. These hunts help organizations detect and mitigate threats before they escalate into full-blown incidents. Our expert hunters work directly with your teams, ensuring that you stay ahead of evolving threats.

Some key benefits of these proactive engagements include:

*   Early Detection: Identifying abnormal activities that could signal a breach or malicious action, reducing the risk of an attack spreading.
*   Continuous Improvement: As we refine the baseline and hunting models, your security posture improves over time, allowing for faster and more accurate threat detection.
*   Actionable Insights: Proactive hunts deliver actionable intelligence that helps your teams strengthen their defenses, based on the latest threat trends and attack methods.

**Why it matters**

The cybersecurity landscape is constantly evolving, and traditional defensive methods alone are no longer sufficient. Threat actors are adept at blending malicious activity with normal operations, making it difficult to spot attacks using conventional means. By conducting baseline hunts, hypothesis-driven hunts and model-assisted threat hunts, Talos IR gives your organization the tools it needs to stay ahead of adversaries.

As new evidence is uncovered during a hunt, our team adapts and refines the investigation in real time — evolving the hypothesis, adjusting the scope or pivoting to new areas of focus based on what the data reveals.

If an active threat, adversary or malicious activity is detected during a hunt, Talos IR can dynamically pivot the engagement and escalate the situation to our 24/7 on-call Incident Response team. This ensures rapid response for containment, mitigation and eradication, effectively minimizing the potential impact of the threat.

Our Talos IR team collaborates seamlessly with the hunting team to deliver real-time support in identifying, isolating and neutralizing active threats. This integrated approach ensures your systems remain secure and prevents the threat from escalating further.

At Talos, our goal is to empower your team with the knowledge and tools to detect threats proactively, before they turn into incidents. Through our IR Retainer services, we provide continuous support to help you improve your security posture and stay one step ahead of emerging threats, all while leveraging the full power of Talos Threat Intelligence.

For more information about this service, download our At-a-Glance:

Proactive threat hunting with Talos IR

Joe talks about how helping the helpers can put a fire in you and the importance of keeping nonprofits cybersecure.

Thursday, May 1, 2025 14:01

Welcome to this week’s edition of the Threat Source newsletter. 

Recently, I was invited to sit on a panel at the CIO4Good Conference here in Washington D.C., where I talked about incident response and cyber preparedness to a room full of CIOs who help lead wonderful missions to help others. I’m incredibly fortunate to be able to volunteer for the NGO community. I’ve been involved with them for a few years now, and it has been a singular experience.  

I sit in a uniquely blessed situation. Cisco Talos is resourced to help protect our customers — we have expertise, tooling and a huge array of diverse security skillsets. A humanitarian assistance or non-governmental organization (NGO) usually has none or very few of these luxuries. If I can take some of my time and experience here at Talos and help others who provide housing to the homeless, protect refugees or feed the hungry, damn right I’m gonna do it. And NGOs? They really need help.  

In today’s global humanitarian funding climate, money and grants are very scarce to come by_._ This means the competition for the dollars that remain is fierce, and that things like cybersecurity can fall by the wayside. But security in an NGO is incredibly important. We're talking about incredibly vulnerable and marginalized people who deserve aid, and the amazing volunteers who should have privacy without malicious interference. 

The hard truth is that cybersecurity can be a bleak space. We as professionals do not operate in the “good news” business. We work, and thrive, in adversarial conditions — actively searching for what the bad guys are doing and learning how they are coming after the good guys. They’re launching ransomware. They are extorting and causing real harm to others. This is day in and day out, and it can wear you down mentally. You have to endure and focus on the mission. After all, that’s the gig. 

This is why I enjoy volunteering by either giving some of my time and expertise to a mentee or to an NGO that has an outstanding mission to help others. It puts fuel in your soul and reminds you that others are fighting their own good fights. These organizations are some of the best. They have a thankless, often dangerous, mission to help others have better lives. The way I see it, volunteering is the least I could do. 

If you want to join me, there are some places that could use your help. Check out the Cyber Peace Institute, or Defcon Project Franklin.

**The one big thing **

This week is bittersweet because we’re discussing the final section of Talos' 2024 Year in Review report. Let’s jump into the abyss of AI-based threats together. 

**Why do I care? **

AI may not have upended the threat landscape last year, but it’s setting the stage for 2025, where agentic AI and automated vulnerability discovery could pose serious challenges for defenders. The future may bring:

1.  The use of agentic AI to conduct multi-stage attacks or find creative ways to access restricted systems 
2.  Improved personalization and professionalization of social engineering 
3.  Automated vulnerability discovery and exploitation 
4.  Capabilities to compromise AI models, systems and infrastructure that organizations around the world are building 

**So now what? **

Continue to stay informed and alert, and for more information, read Talos’ blog post about these threats or download the full Year in Review.

**Top security headlines of the week **

**AirPlay Vulnerabilities Expose Apple Devices to Zero-Click Takeover.** The identified security defects, 23 in total, could be exploited over wireless networks and peer–to-peer connections, leading to the complete compromise of not only Apple products, but also third-party devices that use the AirPlay SDK. (SecurityWeek) 

**4 Million Affected by VeriSource Data Breach.** VeriSource says the stolen information belonged to employees and dependents of companies using its services. It has been working with its customers to “collect the necessary information to notify additional individuals affected by this incident.” (SecurityWeek) 

**SAP NetWeaver Visual Composer Flaw Under Active Exploitation.** CVE-2025-31324 is a critical vulnerability with a maximum CVSS score of 10 that affects all SAP NetWeaver 7.xx versions. It allows unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbitrary files to Internet exposed systems without any restrictions. (DarkReading) 

**FBI shares massive list of 42,000 LabHost phishing domains.** The FBI has shared 42,000 phishing domains tied to the LabHost cybercrime platform, one of the largest global phishing-as-a-service (PhaaS) platforms that was dismantled in April 2024. (BleepingComputer)

**Can’t get enough Talos? **

State-of-the-art phishing: MFA bypass. Cybercriminals are bypassing multi-factor authentication (MFA) using adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) attacks via reverse proxies, intercepting credentials and authentication cookies.

IR Trends Q1 2025: Phishing soars as identity-based attacks persist. This quarter, phishing attacks surged as the primary method for initial access. Learn how you can detect and prevent pre-ransomware attacks.

TTP Episode 11. Craig, Bill and Hazel discuss three of the biggest callouts from Cisco Talos' latest Incident Response Quarterly Trends.

Talos Takes: Identity and MFA. Hazel and friends discuss how AI isn't rewriting the cybercrime playbook, but it is turbo charging some of the old tricks, particularly on the social engineering side.

**Upcoming events where you can find Talos **

*   PIVOTcon (May 7 – 9) Malaga, Spain 
*   CTA TIPS 2025 (May 14 – 15)  Arlington, VA 
*   Cisco Connect UK & Ireland (May 20) London, UK 
*   BotConf (May 20 – 23) Angers, France 
*   Cisco Live U.S. (June 8 – 12) San Diego, CA

**Most prevalent malware files from Talos telemetry over the past week **

**SHA256: 9f1f11a708d393e0a4109ae189bc64f1f3e312653dcf317a2bd406f18ffcc507**    
MD5: 2915b3f8b703eb744fc54c81f4a9c67f    
VirusTotal: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/9f1f11a708d393e0a4109ae189bc64f1f3e312653dcf317a2bd406f18ffcc507/    
Typical Filename: VID001.exe   
Detection Name: Win.Worm.Bitmin-9847045-0 

**SHA256: a31f222fc283227f5e7988d1ad9c0aecd66d58bb7b4d8518ae23e110308dbf91**    
MD5: 7bdbd180c081fa63ca94f9c22c457376    
VirusTotal: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/a31f222fc283227f5e7988d1ad9c0aecd66d58bb7b4d8518ae23e110308dbf91    
Typical Filename: img001.exe   
Detection Name: Simple\_Custom\_Detection 

**SHA256: 47ecaab5cd6b26fe18d9759a9392bce81ba379817c53a3a468fe9060a076f8ca**    
MD5: 71fea034b422e4a17ebb06022532fdde    
VirusTotal: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/a31f222fc283227f5e7988d1ad9c0aecd66d58bb7b4d8518ae23e110308dbf91    
Typical Filename: VID001.exe    
Detection Name: Coinminer:MBT.26mw.in14.Talos

Understanding the challenges of securing an NGO

Threat actors are bypassing MFA with adversary-in-the-middle attacks via reverse proxies. Phishing-as-a-Service tools like Evilproxy make these threats harder to detect.

Thursday, May 1, 2025 06:00

*   Cybercriminals are bypassing multi-factor authentication (MFA) using adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) attacks via reverse proxies, intercepting credentials and authentication cookies. 
*   The developers behind Phishing-as-a-Service (PhaaS) kits like Tycoon 2FA and Evilproxy have added features to make them easier to use and harder to detect.
*   WebAuthn, a passwordless MFA solution using public key cryptography, prevents password transmission and nullifies server-side authentication databases, offering a robust defense against MFA bypass attacks. 
*   Despite its strong security benefits, WebAuthn has seen slow adoption. Cisco Talos recommends that organizations reassess their current MFA strategies in light of these evolving phishing threats.  

For the past thirty years, phishing has been a staple in many cybercriminals' arsenals. All cybersecurity professionals are familiar with phishing attacks: Criminals impersonate a trusted site in an attempt to social engineer victims into divulging personal or private information such as account usernames and passwords. In the early days of phishing, it was often enough for cybercriminals to create fake landing pages matching the official site, harvest authentication credentials and use them to access victims’ accounts.  

Since that time, network defenders have endeavored to prevent these types of attacks using a variety of techniques. Besides implementing strong anti-spam systems to filter phishing emails out of users’ inboxes, many organizations also conduct simulated phishing attacks on their own users to train them to recognize phishing emails. These techniques worked for a time, but as phishing attacks have become more sophisticated and more targeted, spam filters and user training have become less effective. 

At the root of this problem is the fact that usernames are often easy to guess or discover, and people are generally

very bad at using strong passwords

. People also tend to re-use the same weak passwords across many different sites. Cybercriminals, armed with a victim’s username and password, will often attempt credential stuffing attacks, and log into many different sites using the same username/password combination. 

To prove that users are valid, authentication systems generally rely on at least one of three authentication methods or factors: 

*   Something you **know** (_ex. a username and password_) 
*   Something you **have** (_ex. a smartphone or USB key_) 
*   Something you **are** (_ex. your fingerprint or face recognition_) 

In the presence of increasingly sophisticated phishing messages, using only one authentication factor, such as a username/password, is problematic. Many network defenders have responded by implementing MFA, which includes an additional factor, such as an SMS message or push notification, as an extra step to confirm a user’s identity when logging in. By including an additional factor in the authentication process, compromised usernames and passwords become much less valuable to cybercriminals. However, cybercriminals are a creative bunch, and they have devised a clever way around MFA. Enter the wild world of MFA bypass! 

**How do attackers bypass MFA? **

In order to bypass MFA, attackers insert themselves into the authentication process using an adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) attack. 

Typically, this is done using a reverse proxy. A reverse proxy functions as an intermediary server, accepting requests from the client before forwarding them on to the actual web servers to which the client wishes to connect.  

To bypass MFA the attacker sets up a reverse proxy and sends out phishing messages as normal. When the victim connects to the attacker’s reverse proxy, the attacker forwards the victim’s traffic onwards to the real site. From the perspective of the victim, the site they have connected to looks authentic — and it is! The victim is interacting with the legitimate website. The only difference perceptible to the victim is the location of the site in the web browser’s address bar.  

By inserting themselves in the middle of this client-server communication the attacker is able to intercept the username and password as it is sent from the victim to the legitimate site. This completes the first stage of the attack and triggers an MFA request sent back to the victim from the legitimate site. When the expected MFA request is received and approved, an authentication cookie is returned to the victim through the attacker’s proxy server where it is intercepted by the attacker. The attacker now possesses both the victim’s username/password as well as an authentication cookie from the legitimate site.

__Figure 1. Flow diagram illustrating MFA bypass using a reverse proxy.__

**Phishing-as-a-Service (PhaaS) kits **

Thanks to turnkey Phishing-as-a-Service (Phaas) toolkits, almost anyone can conduct these types of phishing attacks without knowing much about what is happening under the hood. Toolkits such as Tycoon 2FA, Rockstar 2FA, Evilproxy, Greatness, Mamba 2FA and more have emerged in this space. Over time the developers behind some of these kits have added features to make them easier to use and harder to detect:

*   Phaas MFA bypass kits typically include templates for the most popular phishing targets to aid cybercriminals in the task of setting up their phishing campaigns. 
*   MFA bypass kits limit access to the phishing links to only users who possess the correct phishing URL and redirect other visitors to benign webpages.  
*   MFA bypass kits often check the IP address and/or User-Agent header of the visitor, preventing access if the IP address corresponds to a known security company/crawler or if the User-Agent indicates that it is a bot. User-Agent filters may also be used to further target the phishing attacks towards users running specific hardware/software. 
*   Reverse proxy MFA bypass kits typically inject their own JavaScript code into the pages they serve to victims to gather additional information about the visitor, and handle redirects after the authentication cookie has been stolen. These scripts are often dynamically obfuscated to prevent static fingerprinting that would allow security vendors to identify the MFA bypass attack sites. 
*   To thwart anti-phishing defenses which may automatically visit URLs contained in an email at the time it is received, there may be a short, programmable delay between when the phishing message is sent and when the phishing lure URL is activated. 

__Figure 2. An example phishing message associated with the Tycoon 2FA phishing toolkit.__

Accelerating the rise in MFA bypass attacks via reverse proxy are publicly available open-source tools, such as Evilginx. Evilginx debuted in 2017 as a modified version of the popular open-source web server nginx. Over time, the application was redesigned and rewritten in Go and implements its own HTTP and DNS server. Although it is marketed as a tool for red teams' penetration testing needs, because it is open source, anyone can download and modify it. 

Fortunately for defenders, there are characteristics common to Evilginx deployments, as well as other AiTM MFA bypass toolkits, that can provide clues an MFA bypass attack may be in progress: 

*   Many MFA bypass reverse proxy servers are hosted on relatively newly registered domains/certificates.  
*   Capturing an authentication cookie only gives attackers access to the victim’s account for that single session. Once they have access to a victim’s account, many attackers add additional MFA devices to the account to maintain persistence. By auditing MFA logs for this kind of activity, defenders may find accounts that have fallen victim to MFA bypass attacks. 
*   By default, Evilginx phishing lure URLs have a URL path consisting of 8 mixed case letters. 
*   By default, Evilginx uses HTTP certificates obtained from LetsEncrypt. Additionally, the certificates it creates by default have an Organization set to "Evilginx Signature Trust Co.", and a CommonName set to "Evilginx Super-Evil Root CA". 
*   After a session authentication cookie has been intercepted by the attacker, they will typically load this cookie into their own browser to impersonate the victim. Unless the attacker is careful, for a time, there will be two different users with different User-Agents and IP addresses using the same session cookie. This may be discoverable through web logs or security products that look for things like “impossible travel”. 
*   To avoid the victim clicking a link that redirects them away from the phishing site, the Evilginx reverse proxy rewrites URLs contained in the HTML from the legitimate site. Popular phishing targets may utilize very specific URL paths, and network defenders can look for these URL paths being served from servers other than the legitimate site.  
*   Many MFA bypass reverse proxy implementations are written using Transport Layer Security (TLS) implementations that are native to that programming language. Thus, the TLS fingerprint of the reverse proxy and the legitimate website will be different.  

**WebAuthn to the rescue? **

FIDO (Fast IDentity Online) Alliance and W3C  created WebAuthn (Web Authentication API) — a specification that enables MFA based on public key cryptography. WebAuthn is essentially passwordless. When a user registers for MFA using WebAuthn, a cryptographic keypair is generated. The private key is kept on the user’s device, and the corresponding public key is kept on the server.  

When a client wants to log in, they indicate this to the server who responds with a challenge. The client then signs this data and returns it to the server. The server can verify the challenge was signed using the user’s private key. No passwords are ever entered into a web form, and no passwords are transmitted over the internet. This also has the side effect of making server-side authentication databases useless to attackers. What good will stealing a public key do? 

__Figure 3. The WebAuthn authentication process.__

As an extra layer of security, WebAuthn credentials are also bound to the website origin where they will be used. For example, suppose a user clicks a link in a phishing message and navigates to an attacker-controlled reverse proxy at mfabypass.com, which is impersonating the user’s bank. The location in the web browser’s address bar will not match the location of the bank to which the credentials are bound, and the WebAuthn MFA authentication process will fail. Binding credentials to a specific origin also eliminates related identity-based attacks such as credential stuffing, where attackers try to reuse the same credentials at multiple sites. 

Although the WebAuthn specification was first published back in 2019, it has experienced relatively slow adoption. Based on authentication telemetry data from Cisco Duo for the past six months, it appears that WebAuthn MFA authentications still make up a very low percentage of all MFA authentications.  

To a certain degree, this is understandable. Many organizations may have already rolled out other types of MFA and may feel like that is enough protection. However, they may want to rethink their approach as more and more phishing attacks implement MFA bypass strategies.  

**Coverage**

Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly AMP for Endpoints) is ideally suited to prevent the execution of the malware detailed in this post. Try Secure Endpoint for free here.

Cisco Secure Email (formerly Cisco Email Security) can block malicious emails sent by threat actors as part of their campaign. You can try Secure Email for free here.

Cisco Secure Firewall (formerly Next-Generation Firewall and Firepower NGFW) appliances such as Threat Defense Virtual, Adaptive Security Applianceand Meraki MX can detect malicious activity associated with this threat.

Cisco Secure Network/Cloud Analytics (Stealthwatch/Stealthwatch Cloud) analyzes network traffic automatically and alerts users of potentially unwanted activity on every connected device.

Cisco Secure Malware Analytics (Threat Grid) identifies malicious binaries and builds protection into all Cisco Secure products.

Cisco Secure Access is a modern cloud-delivered Security Service Edge (SSE) built on Zero Trust principles.  Secure Access provides seamless transparent and secure access to the internet, cloud services or private application no matter where your users work.  Please contact your Cisco account representative or authorized partner if you are interested in a free trial of Cisco Secure Access.

Umbrella, Cisco’s secure internet gateway (SIG), blocks users from connecting to malicious domains, IPs and URLs, whether users are on or off the corporate network. 

Cisco Secure Web Appliance (formerly Web Security Appliance) automatically blocks potentially dangerous sites and tests suspicious sites before users access them. 

Additional protections with context to your specific environment and threat data are available from the Firewall Management Center.

Cisco Duo provides multi-factor authentication for users to ensure only those authorized are accessing your network.

State-of-the-art phishing: MFA bypass

2024 wasn't the year that AI rewrote the cybercrime playbook — but it did turbocharge some of the old tricks. Read this summary of AI-based threats, from Talos' 2024 Year in Review.

Tuesday, April 29, 2025 05:47

2024 wasn't the year that AI rewrote the cybercrime playbook — but it did turbocharge some of the old tricks. In Cisco Talos' 2024 Year in Review, with the help of our friends at Robust Intelligence (now a Cisco company), we dissect how cybercriminals used generative AI to scale up social engineering, fine-tune phishing, and automate grunt work like OSINT gathering.

So while AI didn't completely rock the threat landscape last year, the groundwork is being laid for 2025, where agentic AI and automated vulnerability hunting could cause some significant challenges for defenders. Our research showcases the top four areas of concern for the coming year.

Curious about how AI could impact your defenses — or your data — this year? Take a look at this summary of AI-based threats:

Need a 60 second summary? Take a look at this video:

Download Talos' 2024 Year in Review.

Also check out Cisco's State of AI Security report.

Source

TALOS