#docker

IBM Security Verify Access 10.0.0.0, 10.0.1.0, 10.0.2.0, and 10.0.3.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 221194.

Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery, versions prior to 19.11, contain a privilege escalation vulnerability on virtual appliance deployments. A lower-privileged authenticated user can chain docker commands to escalate privileges to root leading to complete system takeover.

Hyperledger Fabric is a permissioned distributed ledger framework. In affected versions if a consensus client sends a malformed consensus request to an orderer it may crash the orderer node. A fix has been added in commit 0f1835949 which checks for missing consensus messages and returns an error to the consensus client should the message be missing. Users are advised to upgrade to versions 2.2.7 or v2.4.5. There are no known workarounds for this issue.

Red Hat Security Advisory 2022-5498-01 - Red Hat Satellite is a systems management tool for Linux-based infrastructure. It allows for provisioning, remote management, and monitoring of multiple Linux deployments with a single centralized tool. Issues addressed include HTTP request smuggling, buffer overflow, bypass, code execution, cross site scripting, denial of service, heap overflow, information leakage, privilege escalation, remote shell upload, remote SQL injection, and traversal vulnerabilities.

Magnolia CMS versions 6.2.19 and below suffer from a persistent cross site scripting vulnerability.

An update is now available for Red Hat Satellite 6.11This content is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). If you distribute this content, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat Inc. and provide a link to the original. Related CVEs: * CVE-2021-3200: libsolv: heap-based buffer overflow in testcase_read() in src/testcase.c * CVE-2021-3584: foreman: Authenticate remote code execution through Sendmail configuration * CVE-2021-4142: Satellite: Allow unintended SCA certificate to authenticate Candlepin * CVE-2021-21290: netty: Information disclosure via the local system temporary directory * CVE-2021-21295: netty: possible request smuggling in HTTP/2 due missing validation * CVE-2021-21409: netty: Request smuggling via content-length header * CVE-2021-30151: sidekiq: XSS via the queue name of the live-poll feature * CVE-2021-32839: python-sqlparse: ReDoS via regular expression i...

** DISPUTED ** The findOne function in TypeORM before 0.3.0 can either be supplied with a string or a FindOneOptions object. When input to the function is a user-controlled parsed JSON object, supplying a crafted FindOneOptions instead of an id string leads to SQL injection. NOTE: the vendor's position is that the user's application is responsible for input validation.

Canarytokens is an open source tool which helps track activity and actions on your network. A Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability was identified in the history page of triggered Canarytokens. This permits an attacker who recognised an HTTP-based Canarytoken (a URL) to execute Javascript in the Canarytoken's history page (domain: canarytokens.org) when the history page is later visited by the Canarytoken's creator. This vulnerability could be used to disable or delete the affected Canarytoken, or view its activation history. It might also be used as a stepping stone towards revealing more information about the Canarytoken's creator to the attacker. For example, an attacker could recover the email address tied to the Canarytoken, or place Javascript on the history page that redirect the creator towards an attacker-controlled Canarytoken to show the creator's network location. An attacker could only act on the discovered Canarytoken. This issue did not expose other Canarytokens or other Ca...

We take a look at the latest additions to security researchers’ armory

What are container image vulnerabilities?