#java

Node.js has released updates to fix what it described as a critical security issue impacting "virtually every production Node.js app" that, if successfully exploited, could trigger a denial-of-service (DoS) condition. "Node.js/V8 makes a best-effort attempt to recover from stack space exhaustion with a catchable error, which frameworks have come to rely on for service availability," Node.js's

The Computer Emergency Response Team of Ukraine (CERT-UA) has disclosed details of new cyber attacks targeting its defense forces with malware known as PLUGGYAPE between October and December 2025. The activity has been attributed with medium confidence to a Russian hacking group tracked as Void Blizzard (aka Laundry Bear or UAC-0190). The threat actor is believed to be active since at least

### Summary A malicious website can abuse the server URL override feature of the OpenCode web UI to achieve cross-site scripting on `http://localhost:4096`. From there, it is possible to run arbitrary commands on the local system using the `/pty/` endpoints provided by the OpenCode API. ### Code execution via OpenCode API - The OpenCode API has `/pty/` endpoints that allow spawning arbitrary processes on the local machine. - When you run `opencode` in your terminal, OpenCode automatically starts an HTTP server on `localhost:4096` that exposes the API along with a web interface. - JavaScript can make arbitrary same-origin `fetch()` requests to the `/pty/` API endpoints. Therefore, JavaScript execution on `http://localhost:4096` gets you code execution on local the machine. ### JavaScript execution on localhost:4096 The markdown renderer used for LLM responses will insert arbitrary HTML into the DOM. There is no sanitization with DOMPurify or even a CSP on the web interface to pre...

*Previously reported via email to support@sst.dev on 2025-11-17 per the security policy in [opencode-sdk-js/SECURITY.md](https://github.com/sst/opencode-sdk-js/blob/main/SECURITY.md). No response received.* ### Summary OpenCode automatically starts an unauthenticated HTTP server that allows any local process—or any website via permissive CORS—to execute arbitrary shell commands with the user's privileges. ### Details When OpenCode starts, it spawns an HTTP server (default port 4096+) with no authentication. Critical endpoints exposed: - `POST /session/:id/shell` - Execute shell commands (`server.ts:1401`) - `POST /pty` - Create interactive terminal sessions (`server.ts:267`) - `GET /file/content?path=` - Read arbitrary files (`server.ts:1868`) The server is started automatically in `cli/cmd/tui/worker.ts:36` via `Server.listen()`. No authentication middleware exists in `server/server.ts`. The server uses permissive CORS (`.use(cors())` with default `Access-Control-Allow-Origin: ...

### Summary Renovate can be tricked into executing shell code while updating the Gradle Wrapper. A malicious `distributionUrl` in `gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties` can lead to command execution in the Renovate runtime. ### Details When Renovate handles Gradle Wrapper artifacts, it may run a wrapper update command such as: - `./gradlew :wrapper --gradle-distribution-url <value>` In the observed behavior, Renovate executes this via a shell (e.g., `/bin/sh -c ...`). If `distributionUrl` contains shell command substitution syntax like `$(...)`, the shell evaluates it **before** Gradle validates/parses the URL. After that, Gradle attempts to parse the URL as a URI and fails with `URISyntaxException`, but the shell substitution has already executed. This is reproducible even when `allowScripts` is disabled (default is OFF), because this execution happens as part of Gradle Wrapper artifact handling rather than “repository install scripts”. Prerequisites / attack conditions: - ...

Cybersecurity researchers have discovered a major web skimming campaign that has been active since January 2022, targeting several major payment networks like American Express, Diners Club, Discover, JCB Co., Ltd., Mastercard, and UnionPay. "Enterprise organizations that are clients of these payment providers are the most likely to be impacted," Silent Push said in a report published today.

**Summary** The Mailpit WebSocket server is configured to accept connections from any origin. This lack of Origin header validation introduces a Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH) vulnerability. An attacker can host a malicious website that, when visited by a developer running Mailpit locally, establishes a WebSocket connection to the victim's Mailpit instance (default ws://localhost:8025). This allows the attacker to intercept sensitive data such as email contents, headers, and server statistics in real-time. **Vulnerable Code** The vulnerability exists in server/websockets/client.go where the CheckOrigin function is explicitly set to return true for all requests, bypassing standard Same-Origin Policy (SOP) protections provided by the gorilla/websocket library. https://github.com/axllent/mailpit/blob/877a9159ceeaf380d5bb0e1d84017b24d2e7b361/server/websockets/client.go#L34-L39 **Impact** This vulnerability impacts the Confidentiality of the data stored in or processed by Mailpi...

### Summary Stored XSS Leading to Account Takeover ### Details The Exploit Chain: 1.Upload: The attacker uploads an `.html` file containing a JavaScript payload. 2.Execution: A logged-in administrator is tricked into visiting the URL of this uploaded file. 3.Token Refresh: The JavaScript payload makes a `fetch` request to the `/system/api/refreshAccessToken` endpoint. Because the administrator is logged in, their browser automatically attaches the `haxcms_refresh_token` cookie to this request. 4.JWT Theft: The server validates the refresh token and responds with a new, valid JWT access token in the JSON response. 5.Exfiltration: The JavaScript captures this new JWT from the response and sends it to an attacker-controlled server. 6.Account Takeover: The attacker now possesses a valid administrator JWT and can take full control of the application. Vulnerability recurrence: <img width="1198" height="756" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7062d542-702e-4cbe-849...

### Vulnerability https://github.com/samrocketman/jervis/blob/157d2b63ffa5c4bb1d8ee2254950fd2231de2b05/src/main/groovy/net/gleske/jervis/tools/SecurityIO.groovy#L593-L594 Uses `java.util.Random()` which is not cryptographically secure. ### Impact If an attacker can predict the random delays, they may still be able to perform timing attacks. ### Patches Jervis will use `SecureRandom` for timing randomization. Upgrade to Jervis 2.2. ### Workarounds None ### References - [OWASP Cryptographic Failures](https://owasp.org/Top10/A02_2021-Cryptographic_Failures/)

### Prologue These vulnerabilities have been found and chained by DCODX-AI. Validation of the exploit chain has been confirmed manually. ### Summary A persistent stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the custom_hotkeys functionality of the application. An authenticated attacker (or one who can trick a user/administrator into updating their custom_hotkeys) can inject JavaScript code that executes in other users’ browsers when those users load any page using the `templates/base.html` template. Because the application exposes an API token endpoint (`/api/current-user/token`) to the browser and lacks robust CSRF protection on some API endpoints, the injected script may fetch the victim’s API token or call token reset endpoints — enabling full account takeover and unauthorized API access. This vulnerability is of critical severity due to the broad impact, minimal requirements for exploitation (authenticated user), and the ability to escalate privileges to full accoun...