#vulnerability

The company's August security update consisted of patches for 111 unique Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs).

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.10, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.1 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.16 and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows a remote authenticated attacker to inject JavaScript code in the “first display label” field in the configuration of a custom sort widget. This malicious payload is then reflected and executed by clay button taglib when refreshing the page.

#### Problem The sanitization logic at https://github.com/darylldoyle/svg-sanitizer/blob/0.21.0/src/Sanitizer.php#L454-L481 only searches for lower-case attribute names (e.g. `xlink:href` instead of `xlink:HrEf`), which allows to by-pass the `isHrefSafeValue` check. As a result this allows cross-site scripting or linking to external domains. #### Proof-of-concept _provided by azizk_ ``` <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="100" height="100"> <a xlink:hReF="javascript:alert(document.domain)"> <rect width="100" height="50" fill="red"></rect> <text x="50" y="30" text-anchor="middle" fill="white">Click me</text> </a> </svg> ``` #### Credits The mentioned findings and proof-of-concept example were reported to the TYPO3 Security Team by the external security researcher `azizk <medazizknani@gmail.com>`.

Microsoft has released its monthly security update for August 2025, which includes 111 vulnerabilities affecting a range of products, including 13 that Microsoft marked as “critical”.   In this month's release, Microsoft observed none of the included vulnerabilities being actively exploited in the wild. Out

### Summary It is possible to bypass the mitigation introduced in response to [CVE-2025-1550](https://github.com/keras-team/keras/security/advisories/GHSA-48g7-3x6r-xfhp), when an untrusted Keras v3 model is loaded, even when “safe_mode” is enabled, by crafting malicious arguments to built-in Keras modules. The vulnerability is exploitable on the default configuration and does not depend on user input (just requires an untrusted model to be loaded). ### Impact | Type | Vector |Impact| | -------- | ------- | ------- | |Unsafe deserialization |Client-Side (when loading untrusted model)|Arbitrary file overwrite. Can lead to Arbitrary code execution in many cases.| ### Details Keras’ [safe_mode](https://www.tensorflow.org/api_docs/python/tf/keras/models/load_model) flag is designed to disallow unsafe lambda deserialization - specifically by rejecting any arbitrary embedded Python code, marked by the “__lambda__” class name. https://github.com/keras-team/keras/blob/v3.8.0/keras/sr...

Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha1, 2.4.8-p1, 2.4.7-p6, 2.4.6-p11, 2.4.5-p13, 2.4.4-p14 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be exploited by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. These scripts may be used to escalate privileges within the application or compromise sensitive user data. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.

### Impact A prototype pollution vulnerability exists in versions 0.5.0 and earlier, wherein if you provide a policy name called `__proto__` you can override the Object prototype. For example: ``` const parse = require('content-security-policy-parser'); const x = parse("default-src 'self'; __proto__ foobar"); console.log('raw print:', x); console.log('toString:', x.toString()); ``` Outputs: ``` raw print: Array { 'default-src': [ "'self'" ] } toString: foobar ``` Whilst no gadget exists in this library, it is possible via other libraries expose functionality that enable RCE. It is customary to label prototype pollution vulnerabilities in this way. The most common effect of this is denial of service, as you can trivially overwrite properties. As the content security policy is provided in HTTP queries, it is incredibly likely that network exploitation is possible. ### Patches There has been a patch implemented a year ago (11 Feb 2024), but low uptake of patched versions has not b...

Two different groups were found to have abused a now patched vulneraability in popular archive software WinRAR. Who's next?

August “In the Trend of VM” (#18): vulnerabilities in Microsoft Windows and SharePoint. A traditional monthly roundup – this time, it’s extremely short. 🗞 Post on Habr (rus)🗒 Digest on the PT website (rus) Only two trending vulnerabilities: 🔻 Remote Code Execution – Microsoft SharePoint Server “ToolShell” (CVE-2025-53770). The vulnerability is being widely exploited; attackers […]

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.131, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.12 and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows an remote non-authenticated attacker to inject JavaScript into the google_gadget.