Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Tag

#csrf

CVE-2022-3208

The Simple File List WordPress plugin before 4.4.12 does not implement nonce checks, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin create new page and change it's content via a CSRF attack.

CVE
#csrf#wordpress
CVE-2022-3154

The Woo Billingo Plus WordPress plugin before 4.4.5.4, Integration for Billingo & Gravity Forms WordPress plugin before 1.0.4, Integration for Szamlazz.hu & Gravity Forms WordPress plugin before 1.2.7 are lacking CSRF checks in various AJAX actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in Shop Managers and above perform unwanted actions, such as deactivate the plugin's license

CVE-2022-2350

The Disable User Login WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks when updating its settings, allowing unauthenticated attackers to block (or unblock) users at will.

GHSA-jjmg-x456-w976: Incorrect default cookie name and recommendation

### Impact _What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_ The default cookie name (and documentation recommendation) was prefixed with `Host__` instead of `__Host-`. The point of this prefix is for additional security, to ensure that, when no domain option is provided in the cookie options, we can guarantee the cookie came from the correct domain. ### Patches _Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_ Yes, the problem is patched from version 2.2.1, this will not be back ported, but you can use the workaround described below. ### Workarounds _Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_ You can work around this by providing a custom `cookieName` as part of the options, which is correctly prefixed with `__Host-`. ### References _Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_ https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Cross-Site_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html#cookie-with-__host-prefix ...

GHSA-pj2c-h76w-vv6f: tiny-csrf has openly visible CSRF tokens

### Impact Weak encryption on CSRF so tokens can be read by malicious attackers. ### Patches Problems have been patched as of v1.1.0 ### Workarounds Upgrade to v1.1.0 ### References https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Cross-Site_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html ### For more information Submit an issue at [the github repo](https://github.com/valexandersaulys/tiny-csrf)

CVE-2022-39285: Only perform actions on post. Doing them on GET allows doing actions … · ZoneMinder/zoneminder@c0a4c05

ZoneMinder is a free, open source Closed-circuit television software application The file parameter is vulnerable to a cross site scripting vulnerability (XSS) by backing out of the current "tr" "td" brackets. This then allows a malicious user to provide code that will execute when a user views the specific log on the "view=log" page. This vulnerability allows an attacker to store code within the logs that will be executed when loaded by a legitimate user. These actions will be performed with the permission of the victim. This could lead to data loss and/or further exploitation including account takeover. This issue has been addressed in versions `1.36.27` and `1.37.24`. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should disable database logging.

CVE-2022-39290: CSRF Key Bypass Using HTTP Methods

ZoneMinder is a free, open source Closed-circuit television software application. In affected versions authenticated users can bypass CSRF keys by modifying the request supplied to the Zoneminder web application. These modifications include replacing HTTP POST with an HTTP GET and removing the CSRF key from the request. An attacker can take advantage of this by using an HTTP GET request to perform actions with no CSRF protection. This could allow an attacker to cause an authenticated user to perform unexpected actions on the web application. Users are advised to upgrade as soon as possible. There are no known workarounds for this issue.

CVE-2022-39287: Openly visible CSRF tokens in versions prior to v1.1.0

tiny-csrf is a Node.js cross site request forgery (CSRF) protection middleware. In versions prior to 1.1.0 cookies were not encrypted and thus CSRF tokens were transmitted in the clear. This issue has been addressed in commit `8eead6d` and the patch with be included in version 1.1.0. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue.

CVE-2022-2986: Invalid Bug ID

Enabling and disabling installed H5P libraries did not include the necessary token to prevent a CSRF risk.

CVE-2022-2783: Security Advisory 2022-17

In affected versions of Octopus Server it was identified that a session cookie could be used as the CSRF token