#js

### Impact There is an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in React Server Components. We recommend upgrading immediately. The vulnerability is present in versions 19.0, 19.1.0, 19.1.1, and 19.2.0 of: * [react-server-dom-webpack](https://www.npmjs.com/package/react-server-dom-webpack) * [react-server-dom-parcel](https://www.npmjs.com/package/react-server-dom-parcel) * [react-server-dom-turbopack](https://www.npmjs.com/package/react-server-dom-turbopack?activeTab=readme) ### Patches A fix was introduced in versions [19.0.1](https://github.com/facebook/react/releases/tag/v19.0.1), [19.1.2](https://github.com/facebook/react/releases/tag/v19.1.2), and [19.2.1](https://github.com/facebook/react/releases/tag/v19.2.1). If you are using any of the above packages please upgrade to any of the fixed versions immediately. If your app’s React code does not use a server, your app is not affected by this vulnerability. If your app does not use a framework, bundler, or bundler pl...

A vulnerability affects certain React packages¹ for versions 19.0.0, 19.1.0, 19.1.1, and 19.2.0 and frameworks that use the affected packages, including Next.js 15.x and 16.x using the App Router. The issue is tracked upstream as [CVE-2025-55182](https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-55182). Fixed in: React: 19.0.1, 19.1.2, 19.2.1 Next.js: 15.0.5, 15.1.9, 15.2.6, 15.3.6, 15.4.8, 15.5.7, 16.0.7 The vulnerability also affects experimental canary releases starting with 14.3.0-canary.77. Users on any of the 14.3 canary builds should either downgrade to a 14.x stable release or 14.3.0-canary.76. All users of stable 15.x or 16.x Next.js versions should upgrade to a patched, stable version immediately. ¹ The affected React packages are: - react-server-dom-parcel - react-server-dom-turbopack - react-server-dom-webpack

A maximum-severity security flaw has been disclosed in React Server Components (RSC) that, if successfully exploited, could result in remote code execution. The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-55182, carries a CVSS score of 10.0. It allows "unauthenticated remote code execution by exploiting a flaw in how React decodes payloads sent to React Server Function endpoints," the React Team said in

When an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the `toFixed()` function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: `NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult` where `pow5mult` attempts to raise `5` to a ridiculous power. Example code: `(4.47118444E-314).toFixed(2)`

### Impact Javascript code can be injected by malicious editors for a stored XSS attack if the standard Content Security Policy is disabled. ### Workaround If the standard CSP rules are active (default in production mode), an exploit isn't possible. ### Credits Lwin Min Oo <lwinminoo2244@gmail.com>

### Summary Arbitrary files can be uploaded via the GrapesJS Builder, as the types of files that can be uploaded are not restricted. ### Impact If the media folder is not restricted from running files this can lead to a remote code execution.

### Summary `vllm` has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named `Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config`. When `vllm` loads a model config that contains an `auto_map` entry, the config class resolves that mapping with `get_class_from_dynamic_module(...)` and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the `auto_map` string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets `trust_remote_code=False` in `vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config`. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose `config.json` points via `auto_map` to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. ### Details The vulnerable code resolves and instantiates classes from `auto_map` entries without checking whether those entries point to a different repo or whether remote code execution is allowed. ```python class Nemotron_N...

The supply chain campaign known as GlassWorm has once again reared its head, infiltrating both Microsoft Visual Studio Marketplace and Open VSX with 24 extensions impersonating popular developer tools and frameworks like Flutter, React, Tailwind, Vim, and Vue. GlassWorm was first documented in October 2025, detailing its use of the Solana blockchain for command-and-control (C2) and harvest npm,

### Impact Multiple (unprefixed) classnames could be added in markdown source by using character references. This could make rendered user supplied markdown `code` elements appear like the rest of the page. The following markdown: ````markdown ```js&#x20;xss ``` ```` Would create `<pre><code class="language-js xss"></code></pre>` If your page then applied `.xss` classes (or listeners in JS), those apply to this element. For more info see <https://github.com/ChALkeR/notes/blob/master/Improper-markup-sanitization.md#unsanitized-class-attribute> ### Patches The bug was patched. When using regular semver, run `npm install`. For exact ranges, make sure to use `13.2.1`. ### Workarounds Update. ### References * bug introduced in https://github.com/syntax-tree/mdast-util-to-hast/commit/6fc783ae6abdeb798fd5a68e7f3f21411dde7403 * bug fixed in https://github.com/syntax-tree/mdast-util-to-hast/commit/ab3a79570a1afbfa7efef5d4a0cd9b5caafbc5d7

### Summary A Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) vulnerability exists in Grav that allows authenticated attackers with editor permissions to execute arbitrary commands on the server and, under certain conditions, may also be exploited by unauthenticated attackers. This vulnerability stems from weak regex validation in the `cleanDangerousTwig` method. ### Important - First of all this vulnerability is due to weak sanitization in the method `clearDangerousTwig`, so any other class that calls it indirectly through for example `$twig->processString` to sanitize code is also vulnerable. - For this report, we will need the official Form and Admin plugin installed, also I will be chaining this with another vulnerability to allow an editor which is a user with only pages permissions to edit the process section of a form. - I made another report for the other vulnerability which is a Broken Access Control which allows a user with full permission for pages to change the process section by ...