Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Tag

#perl

GHSA-4jhj-3gv3-c3gr: CLI for Vela Insecure Variable Substitution

### Impact Vela pipelines can use variable substitution combined with insensitive fields like `parameters`, `image` and `entrypoint` to inject secrets into a plugin/image and — by using common substitution string manipulation — can bypass log masking and expose secrets without the use of the commands block. This unexpected behavior primarily impacts secrets restricted by the "no commands" option. This can lead to unintended use of the secret value, and increased risk of exposing the secret during image execution bypassing log masking. Given by the following substitution examples: using `parameters` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secrets: [ example_secret ] parameters: example: $${EXAMPLE_SECRET} ``` using `image` tag ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin>:latest${EXAMPLE_SECRET} secrets: [ example_secret ] ``` using `entrypoint` as a shim for `commands` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secre...

ghsa
#git#perl#auth#docker
GHSA-v8mx-hp2q-gw85: Golang SDK for Vela Insecure Variable Substitution

### Impact Vela pipelines can use variable substitution combined with insensitive fields like `parameters`, `image` and `entrypoint` to inject secrets into a plugin/image and — by using common substitution string manipulation — can bypass log masking and expose secrets without the use of the commands block. This unexpected behavior primarily impacts secrets restricted by the "no commands" option. This can lead to unintended use of the secret value, and increased risk of exposing the secret during image execution bypassing log masking. Given by the following substitution examples: using `parameters` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secrets: [ example_secret ] parameters: example: $${EXAMPLE_SECRET} ``` using `image` tag ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin>:latest${EXAMPLE_SECRET} secrets: [ example_secret ] ``` using `entrypoint` as a shim for `commands` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secre...

GHSA-69p4-j5v5-x234: Server/API for Vela Insecure Variable Substitution

### Impact Vela pipelines can use variable substitution combined with insensitive fields like `parameters`, `image` and `entrypoint` to inject secrets into a plugin/image and — by using common substitution string manipulation — can bypass log masking and expose secrets without the use of the commands block. This unexpected behavior primarily impacts secrets restricted by the "no commands" option. This can lead to unintended use of the secret value, and increased risk of exposing the secret during image execution bypassing log masking. Given by the following substitution examples: using `parameters` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secrets: [ example_secret ] parameters: example: $${EXAMPLE_SECRET} ``` using `image` tag ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin>:latest${EXAMPLE_SECRET} secrets: [ example_secret ] ``` using `entrypoint` as a shim for `commands` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secre...

GHSA-7v38-w32m-wx4m: Types for Vela Insecure Variable Substitution

### Impact Vela pipelines can use variable substitution combined with insensitive fields like `parameters`, `image` and `entrypoint` to inject secrets into a plugin/image and — by using common substitution string manipulation — can bypass log masking and expose secrets without the use of the commands block. This unexpected behavior primarily impacts secrets restricted by the "no commands" option. This can lead to unintended use of the secret value, and increased risk of exposing the secret during image execution bypassing log masking. Given by the following substitution examples: using `parameters` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secrets: [ example_secret ] parameters: example: $${EXAMPLE_SECRET} ``` using `image` tag ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin>:latest${EXAMPLE_SECRET} secrets: [ example_secret ] ``` using `entrypoint` as a shim for `commands` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secre...

GHSA-32jq-mv89-5rx7: CoreWCF NetFraming based services can leave connections open when they should be closed

### Impact If you have a NetFraming based CoreWCF service, extra system resources could be consumed by connections being left established instead of closing or aborting them. There are two scenarios when this can happen. When a client established a connection to the service and sends no data, the service will wait indefinitely for the client to initiate the NetFraming session handshake. Additionally, once a client has established a session, if the client doesn't send any requests for the period of time configured in the binding ReceiveTimeout, the connection is not properly closed as part of the session being aborted. The bindings affected by this behavior are NetTcpBinding, NetNamedPipeBinding, and UnixDomainSocketBinding. Only NetTcpBinding has the ability to accept non local connections. ### Patches The currently supported versions of CoreWCF are v1.4.x and v1.5.x. The fix can be found in v1.4.2 and v1.5.2 of the CoreWCF packages. ### Workarounds There are no workarounds. ### R...

Financials By Coda Cross Site Scripting

Financials by Coda versions prior to 2023Q4 suffer from a cross site scripting vulnerability.

GHSA-pwx5-6wxg-px5h: Insecure Variable Substitution in Vela

### Impact Vela pipelines can use variable substitution combined with insensitive fields like `parameters`, `image` and `entrypoint` to inject secrets into a plugin/image and — by using common substitution string manipulation — can bypass log masking and expose secrets without the use of the commands block. This unexpected behavior primarily impacts secrets restricted by the "no commands" option. This can lead to unintended use of the secret value, and increased risk of exposing the secret during image execution bypassing log masking. Given by the following substitution examples: using `parameters` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secrets: [ example_secret ] parameters: example: $${EXAMPLE_SECRET} ``` using `image` tag ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin>:latest${EXAMPLE_SECRET} secrets: [ example_secret ] ``` using `entrypoint` as a shim for `commands` ```yaml steps: - name: example image: <some plugin> secre...

Ubuntu Security Notice USN-6686-2

Ubuntu Security Notice 6686-2 - It was discovered that the DesignWare USB3 for Qualcomm SoCs driver in the Linux kernel did not properly handle certain error conditions during device registration. A local attacker could possibly use this to cause a denial of service. It was discovered that a race condition existed in the Cypress touchscreen driver in the Linux kernel during device removal, leading to a use-after- free vulnerability. A physically proximate attacker could use this to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code.

Siemens SIMATIC

As of January 10, 2023, CISA will no longer be updating ICS security advisories for Siemens product vulnerabilities beyond the initial advisory. For the most up-to-date information on vulnerabilities in this advisory, please see Siemens' ProductCERT Security Advisories (CERT Services | Services | Siemens Global).  View CSAF 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CVSS v3 9.8 ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity Vendor: Siemens Equipment: SIMATIC Vulnerabilities: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer, Improper Input Validation, Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data, Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource, Expected Behavior Violation, Improper Authentication, Out-of-bounds Write, Use After Free, Inadequate Encryption Strength, Use of Insufficiently Random Values, Incorrect Authorization, Improper Locking, Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames, Improper Privilege Management, Missing Authorization, Cleartext Storage of Sensitive ...

Siemens SCALANCE XB-200/XC-200/XP-200/XF-200BA/XR-300WG Family

As of January 10, 2023, CISA will no longer be updating ICS security advisories for Siemens product vulnerabilities beyond the initial advisory. For the most up-to-date information on vulnerabilities in this advisory, please see Siemens' ProductCERT Security Advisories (CERT Services | Services | Siemens Global).  View CSAF 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CVSS v4 5.1 ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity Vendor: Siemens Equipment: SCALANCE XB-200/XC-200/XP-200/XF-200BA/XR-300WG Family Vulnerabilities: Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key, Uncontrolled Resource Consumption 2. RISK EVALUATION Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an authenticated attacker to cause a denial-of-service condition or extract configuration information from a configuration backup file. 3. TECHNICAL DETAILS 3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS The following products of Siemens, are affected: SCALANCE XB205-3 (SC, PN) (6GK5205-3BB00-2AB2): All versions SCALANCE XB205-3 (ST, E/IP) (6GK5205-3BB00-2TB2): A...