Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Tag

#vulnerability

CVE-2026-0904: Chromium: CVE-2026-0904 Incorrect security UI in Digital Credentials

**Why is this Chrome CVE included in the Security Update Guide?** The vulnerability assigned to this CVE is in Chromium Open Source Software (OSS) which is consumed by Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based). It is being documented in the Security Update Guide to announce that the latest version of Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) is no longer vulnerable. **How can I see the version of the browser?** 1. In your Microsoft Edge browser, click on the 3 dots (...) on the very right-hand side of the window 2. Click on **Help and Feedback** 3. Click on **About Microsoft Edge**

Microsoft Security Response Center
#vulnerability#microsoft#git#chrome#Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based)#Security Vulnerability
CVE-2026-0903: Chromium: CVE-2026-0903 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Downloads

**Why is this Chrome CVE included in the Security Update Guide?** The vulnerability assigned to this CVE is in Chromium Open Source Software (OSS) which is consumed by Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based). It is being documented in the Security Update Guide to announce that the latest version of Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) is no longer vulnerable. **How can I see the version of the browser?** 1. In your Microsoft Edge browser, click on the 3 dots (...) on the very right-hand side of the window 2. Click on **Help and Feedback** 3. Click on **About Microsoft Edge**

CVE-2026-0902: Chromium: CVE-2026-0902 Inappropriate implementation in V8

**Why is this Chrome CVE included in the Security Update Guide?** The vulnerability assigned to this CVE is in Chromium Open Source Software (OSS) which is consumed by Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based). It is being documented in the Security Update Guide to announce that the latest version of Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) is no longer vulnerable. **How can I see the version of the browser?** 1. In your Microsoft Edge browser, click on the 3 dots (...) on the very right-hand side of the window 2. Click on **Help and Feedback** 3. Click on **About Microsoft Edge**

CVE-2026-0901: Chromium: CVE-2026-0901 Inappropriate implementation in Blink

**Why is this Chrome CVE included in the Security Update Guide?** The vulnerability assigned to this CVE is in Chromium Open Source Software (OSS) which is consumed by Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based). It is being documented in the Security Update Guide to announce that the latest version of Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) is no longer vulnerable. **How can I see the version of the browser?** 1. In your Microsoft Edge browser, click on the 3 dots (...) on the very right-hand side of the window 2. Click on **Help and Feedback** 3. Click on **About Microsoft Edge**

CVE-2026-0900: Chromium: CVE-2026-0900 Inappropriate implementation in V8

**Why is this Chrome CVE included in the Security Update Guide?** The vulnerability assigned to this CVE is in Chromium Open Source Software (OSS) which is consumed by Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based). It is being documented in the Security Update Guide to announce that the latest version of Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) is no longer vulnerable. **How can I see the version of the browser?** 1. In your Microsoft Edge browser, click on the 3 dots (...) on the very right-hand side of the window 2. Click on **Help and Feedback** 3. Click on **About Microsoft Edge**

CVE-2026-0899: Chromium: CVE-2026-0899 Out of bounds memory access in V8

**Why is this Chrome CVE included in the Security Update Guide?** The vulnerability assigned to this CVE is in Chromium Open Source Software (OSS) which is consumed by Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based). It is being documented in the Security Update Guide to announce that the latest version of Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) is no longer vulnerable. **How can I see the version of the browser?** 1. In your Microsoft Edge browser, click on the 3 dots (...) on the very right-hand side of the window 2. Click on **Help and Feedback** 3. Click on **About Microsoft Edge**

GHSA-pcjq-j3mq-jv5j: SiYuan Has a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability via Unrestricted SVG File Upload

### Summary A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in SiYuan Note. The application does not sanitize uploaded SVG files. If a user uploads and views a malicious SVG file (e.g., imported from an untrusted source), arbitrary JavaScript code is executed in the context of their authenticated session. ### Details The application allows authenticated users to upload files, including .svg images, without sanitizing the input to remove embedded JavaScript code (such as <script> tags or event handlers). ### PoC 1. Create a new "Daily note" in the workspace. <img width="1287" height="572" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3a4389b9-695d-4e1b-94dc-72efdb047aa9" /> 2. Create a file named test.svg with malicious JavaScript inside: ``` <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="200" height="200" viewBox="0 0 124 124" fill="none"> <rect width="124" height="124" rx="24" fill="red"/> <script type="text/javascript"> alert(window.origin); <...

GHSA-mpwp-4h2m-765c: Active Job - Object injection security vulnerability

Active Job vulnerability: An Active Job bug allowed String arguments to be deserialized as if they were Global IDs, an object injection security vulnerability.

GHSA-5qw5-wf2q-f538: ActiveRecord-JDBC-Adapter (AR-JDBC) lib/arjdbc/jdbc/adapter.rb sql.gsub() Function SQL Injection

ActiveRecord-JDBC-Adapter (AR-JDBC) contains a flaw that may allow carrying out an SQL injection attack. The issue is due to the sql.gsub() function in lib/arjdbc/jdbc/adapter.rb not properly sanitizing user-supplied input before using it in SQL queries. This may allow a remote attacker to inject or manipulate SQL queries in the back-end database, allowing for the manipulation or disclosure of arbitrary data.

GHSA-63vm-454h-vhhq: pyasn1 has a DoS vulnerability in decoder

### Summary After reviewing pyasn1 v0.6.1 a Denial-of-Service issue has been found that leads to memory exhaustion from malformed RELATIVE-OID with excessive continuation octets. ### Details The integer issue can be found in the decoder as `reloid += ((subId << 7) + nextSubId,)`: https://github.com/pyasn1/pyasn1/blob/main/pyasn1/codec/ber/decoder.py#L496 ### PoC For the DoS: ```py import pyasn1.codec.ber.decoder as decoder import pyasn1.type.univ as univ import sys import resource # Deliberately set memory limit to display PoC try: resource.setrlimit(resource.RLIMIT_AS, (100*1024*1024, 100*1024*1024)) print("[*] Memory limit set to 100MB") except: print("[-] Could not set memory limit") # Test with different payload sizes to find the DoS threshold payload_size_mb = int(sys.argv[1]) print(f"[*] Testing with {payload_size_mb}MB payload...") payload_size = payload_size_mb * 1024 * 1024 # Create payload with continuation octets # Each 0x81 byte indicates continuation, ...