#vulnerability

### Summary The API endpoint related to the password reset function is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site-Scripting. ### Details Throughout the source-code analysis, it has been found that the endpoint /api/v1/db/auth/password/reset/:tokenId is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site-Scripting. The flaw occurs due to implementation of the client-side template engine ejs, specifically on file resetPassword.ts where the template is using the insecure function “<%-“ https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/blob/ba5a191b33259d984fc92df225f7d82ede2ddb56/packages/nocodb/src/modules/auth/ui/auth/resetPassword.ts#L71 which is rendered by the function renderPasswordReset: https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/blob/ba5a191b33259d984fc92df225f7d82ede2ddb56/packages/nocodb/src/modules/auth/auth.controller.ts#L251 ### PoC Send the request below to a vulnerable instance: `/api/v1/db/auth/password/reset/asdsad%3C%2F%73%63%72%69%70%74%3E%3C%73%63%72%69%70%74%3E%61%6C%65%72%74%28%31%29%3C%2F%73%63%72%69%70%...

Yo, check it - the ABB BMS/BAS system's got a slick little weakness in them caldavInstall.php, caldavInstallAgendav.php, and caldavUpload.php files. All you gotta do is drop that skipChecksum beat in the POST vibe, and bam, the system skips all that MD5 checksum nonsense, no EXPERTMODE needed to crank the funk. This lets any slick cat without a login slide in some jacked-up CalDAV ZIP files, no questions asked. We're talkin' tampered tunes hittin' the deck, openin' the door to messin' with the system or droppin' some nasty uploads, all unauthorized-like. That's the funky flaw, baby - straight-up tamper town.

Elastic has rolled out security updates to address a critical security flaw impacting the Kibana data visualization dashboard software for Elasticsearch that could result in arbitrary code execution. The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-25012, carries a CVSS score of 9.9 out of a maximum of 10.0. It has been described as a case of prototype pollution. "Prototype pollution in Kibana leads to

View CSAF 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CVSS v3 7.5 ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity Vendor: Hitachi Energy Equipment: PCU400, PCULogger Vulnerabilities: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion'), NULL Pointer Dereference, Use After Free, Double Free, Observable Discrepancy, Out-of-bounds Read 2. RISK EVALUATION Exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to access or decrypt sensitive data, crash the device application, or cause a denial-of-service condition. 3. TECHNICAL DETAILS 3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS Hitachi Energy reports that the following products are affected: PCU400: Version 6.5 K and prior PCU400: Version 9.4.1 and prior PCULogger: Version 1.1.0 and prior 3.2 VULNERABILITY OVERVIEW 3.2.1 ACCESS OF RESOURCE USING INCOMPATIBLE TYPE ('TYPE CONFUSION') CWE-843 There is a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address processing inside an X.509 GeneralName. X.400 addresses were parsed as an ASN1_STRING but the public structur...

View CSAF 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CVSS v4 8.6 ATTENTION: Exploitable remotely/low attack complexity Vendor: Hitachi Energy Equipment: Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO Vulnerability: Improper Handling of Insufficient Privileges 2. RISK EVALUATION Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow anyone with user credentials to bypass the security controls enforced by the product. 3. TECHNICAL DETAILS 3.1 AFFECTED PRODUCTS Hitachi Energy reports the following products are affected: Relion 670/650 series: Version 2.2.0 all revisions Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO series: Version 2.2.1 all revisions up to but not including version 2.2.1.8. Relion 670 series: Version 2.2.2 all revisions up to but not including 2.2.2.5 Relion 670 series: Version 2.2.3 revisions up to 2.2.3.4 Relion 670/650 series Version 2.2.4 all revisions up to but not including version 2.2.4.3. Relion 670/650/SAM600-IO series: Version 2.2.5 up to revision 2.2.5.1 Relion 670/650 series: Version 2.1 all revisions up to but not inclu...

Cisco Talos has discovered an active exploitation of CVE-2024-4577 by an attacker in order to gain access to the victim's machines and carry out post-exploitation activities.

Cyber threats are growing more sophisticated, and traditional security approaches struggle to keep up. Organizations can no longer rely on periodic assessments or static vulnerability lists to stay secure. Instead, they need a dynamic approach that provides real-time insights into how attackers move through their environment. This is where attack graphs come in. By mapping potential attack paths

Versions of the package ray before 2.43.0 are vulnerable to Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File where the redis password is being logged in the standard logging. If the redis password is passed as an argument, it will be logged and could potentially leak the password. This is only exploitable if: 1) Logging is enabled; 2) Redis is using password authentication; 3) Those logs are accessible to an attacker, who can reach that redis instance. **Note:** It is recommended that anyone who is running in this configuration should update to the latest version of Ray, then rotate their redis password.

Jenkins 2.499 and earlier, LTS 2.492.1 and earlier does not require POST requests for the HTTP endpoint toggling collapsed/expanded status of sidepanel widgets (e.g., Build Queue and Build Executor Status widgets), resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. This vulnerability allows attackers to have users toggle their collapsed/expanded status of sidepanel widgets. Additionally, as the API accepts any string as the identifier of the panel ID to be toggled, attacker-controlled content can be stored in the victim’s user profile in Jenkins. Jenkins 2.500, LTS 2.492.2 requires POST requests for the affected HTTP endpoint.

Various features in Jenkins redirect users to partially user-controlled URLs inside Jenkins. To prevent open redirect vulnerabilities, Jenkins limits redirections to safe URLs (neither absolute nor scheme-relative/network-path reference). In Jenkins 2.499 and earlier, LTS 2.492.1 and earlier, redirects starting with backslash (`\`) characters are considered safe. This allows attackers to perform phishing attacks by having users go to a Jenkins URL that will forward them to a different site, because browsers interpret these characters as part of scheme-relative redirects. Jenkins 2.500, LTS 2.492.2 considers redirects to URLs starting with backslash (`\`) characters to be unsafe, rejecting such redirects.