Security
Headlines
HeadlinesLatestCVEs

Tag

#sap

5 Most Common Malware Techniques in 2024

Tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) form the foundation of modern defense strategies. Unlike indicators of compromise (IOCs), TTPs are more stable, making them a reliable way to identify specific cyber threats. Here are some of the most commonly used techniques, according to ANY.RUN's Q3 2024 report on malware trends, complete with real-world examples. Disabling of Windows Event Logging

The Hacker News
#windows#microsoft#linux#git#backdoor#sap#The Hacker News
China-Aligned MirrorFace Hackers Target EU Diplomats with World Expo 2025 Bait

The China-aligned threat actor known as MirrorFace has been observed targeting a diplomatic organization in the European Union, marking the first time the hacking crew has targeted an organization in the region. "During this attack, the threat actor used as a lure the upcoming World Expo, which will be held in 2025 in Osaka, Japan," ESET said in its APT Activity Report for the period April to

Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-8928-03

Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-8928-03 - An update for mod_jk is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutions. Issues addressed include denial of service and information leakage vulnerabilities.

New Winos4.0 Malware Targeting Windows via Fake Gaming Apps

A sophisticated malware called Winos4.0 is being disguised as harmless gaming applications to infiltrate Windows-based systems. Learn about…

GHSA-x8vp-gf4q-mw5j: Symfony allows changing the environment through a query

### Description When the `register_argc_argv` php directive is set to `on` , and users call any URL with a special crafted query string, they are able to change the environment or debug mode used by the kernel when handling the request. ### Resolution The `SymfonyRuntime` now ignores the `argv` values for non-cli SAPIs PHP runtimes The patch for this issue is available [here](https://github.com/symfony/symfony/commit/a77b308c3f179ed7c8a8bc295f82b2d6ee3493fa) for branch 5.4. ### Credits We would like to thank Vladimir Dusheyko for reporting the issue and Wouter de Jong for providing the fix.

8 security tips for small businesses

Small businesses have the same security problems as big corporations, but not the budget or staff to match. Here are some tips to help.

8 security tips for small businesses

Small businesses have the same security problems as big corporations, but not the budget or staff to match. Here are some tips to help.

Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-8874-03

Red Hat Security Advisory 2024-8874-03 - An update for haproxy is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Support, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutions, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Service.

GHSA-3hxg-fxwm-8gf7: CRLF injection in Refit's [Header], [HeaderCollection] and [Authorize] attributes

### Summary The various header-related Refit attributes (Header, HeaderCollection and Authorize) are vulnerable to CRLF injection. ### Details The way HTTP headers are added to a request is via the `HttpHeaders.TryAddWithoutValidation` method: <https://github.com/reactiveui/refit/blob/258a771f44417c6e48e103ac921fe4786f3c2a1e/Refit/RequestBuilderImplementation.cs#L1328> This method does not check for CRLF characters in the header value. This means that any headers added to a refit request are vulnerable to CRLF-injection. In general, CRLF-injection into a HTTP header (when using HTTP/1.1) means that one can inject additional HTTP headers or smuggle whole HTTP requests. ### PoC The below example code creates a console app that takes one command line variable (a bearer token) and then makes a request to some status page with the provided token inserted in the "Authorization" header: ```c# using Refit; internal class Program { private static void Main(string[] args) { ...

IBM Security Verify Access 32 Vulnerabilities

IBM Security Verify Access versions prior to 10.0.8 suffer from authentication bypass, reuse of private keys, local privilege escalation, weak settings, outdated libraries, missing password, hardcoded secrets, remote code execution, missing authentication, null pointer dereference, and lack of privilege separation vulnerabilities.